Started By
Message
re: Masoli denied...
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:38 pm to lsufball19
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:38 pm to lsufball19
quote:
of course that would be the right way to do it in your mind.
Look moron. It the same across the entire planet. You don't enforce rules, laws and contracts by twisting language to suit your needs. You enforce the rules exactly how they are written. If you don't like a rule, you lobby to change the son-of-a-bitch, but when a law is used in a court to explain someones actions, it is not up for debate, it's the law. The court is obligated to rule based on the law as it's written. Context, intent and inference are NOT a part of it.
1
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:40 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
The kid had less baggage than RP
haha, pleeeaaasseee. RP was the sec championship game MVP dude, he was every bit as good as Masoli, and Perrilloux was never convicted of anything either. it's actually a very similar situation, except RP had to go 1-aa, while Ole Miss was dumb enough to take a guy like Masoli.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:40 pm to OPR
they did enforce the rules as they were written. the rules said he was able to "apply" for a waiver, not that he would automatically granted one. the ncaa left the rules vague on purpose so they can look at each case subjectively.
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:40 pm to Bubba Bexley
quote:
Because Houston Nutt don't need no stinkin' quarterbacks. You should know this.
Dammit Bubba!
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:42 pm to Billy Mays
quote:
What the hell does that matter? The point is he's gone and so is Masoli. Is this some sort of pissing contest to you?
Geebus. This, as hehatedrew eloquently put it, is stupid
if masoli is gone, why won't ole miss fans let it go?
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:42 pm to lsufball19
quote:
no, most coaches at a bcs school would not let a guy who was dismissed from school for disciplinary reasons come and play right away.
This is one of the most nieve and rediculous statements ever thrown into the internet.
RP WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO PLAY RIGHT AWAY FOR A BCS/DIV I SCHOOL! For fricks sake, you are stupid.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:43 pm to OPR
quote:
RP WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO PLAY RIGHT AWAY FOR A BCS/DIV I SCHOOL
according to the NCAA, neither is Masoli. Also, when calling someone stupid, I'd learn how to spell "naive" first, "ridiculous" too for that matter
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:43 pm to Billy Mays
What a circus in oxford. OK, so no one is placing blame on nutty but it still doesn't change the fact that he looks like a clown. Big red floppy shoes and all.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:45 pm to lsufball19
quote:
not really, those articles are always sunshine pumping and don't mean anything.
Read the article and then we'll talk. It's called an investigation. You think the writer sat in his den for 3 days, made two phone calls and then made up the entire article? Or do you think the writer actually went to Oregon, talked to all involved, made a hundred calls, asked questions and actually INVESTIGATED the situation.
Your blind hatred for OM is making you look stupid.
You must have been truly scared to play us with him taking snaps.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:45 pm to misey94
quote:
If Ole Miss tries to do an end around on the man, they will get wacked in the end. The NCAA will dig up or make up something. It will be bad, too. They just need to move on. It isn't fair. Nothing with the NCAA is. But it is what it is, and that's all there is.
^^THIS^^ Just leave it alone and hope they dont sniff around Oxford.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:45 pm to EasyB
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:47 pm to lsufball19
quote:
they did enforce the rules as they were written. the rules said he was able to "apply" for a waiver, not that he would automatically granted one. the ncaa left the rules vague on purpose so they can look at each case subjectively.
Wow. I wasn't aware that you were on the NCAA panel that decides these issues on a case by case basis.
Pathetic dude.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:47 pm to OPR
quote:
You must have been truly scared to play us with him taking snaps.
not really, once Dexter was gone, Ole Miss isn't scary to anyone to be completely honest. My hatred for Ole Miss makes this whole thing funny, yes, but Ole Miss fans thinking the NCAA is picking on them makes it even funnier.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:49 pm to OPR
quote:
Wow. I wasn't aware that you were on the NCAA panel that decides these issues on a case by case basis.
Pathetic dude.
just read the rule. It says a player may apply for a waiver in those circumstances. nowhere does it say a player will be automatically granted one. the rule has been posted umpteen times throughout this thread. go back and read it if you wish.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:55 pm to lsufball19
quote:
according to the NCAA, neither is Masoli.
facepalm.
I cannot argue with someone who keeps circling his own a-hole with the dildo.
RP was CLEARLY and UNEQUIVOCALLY not eligible.
JM was CLEARY and in black and white language in the NCAA's own rule book ELIGIBLE to play this season. There are several precedences ( Here and here) within the last few years to look at. RP was cut and dry. This was as well, but in the opposite direction. The NCAA took some heat from SEC coaches and ESPN and ruled this way to cover their own asses. Instead of stating that they were against the transfer and fixing the "loophole" next season.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 12:59 pm to lsufball19
quote:
not really, once Dexter was gone, Ole Miss isn't scary to anyone to be completely honest. My hatred for Ole Miss makes this whole thing funny, yes, but Ole Miss fans thinking the NCAA is picking on them makes it even funnier.
Did I ever say they were picking on us? No. What I said is that their arbitrary interpretation of their own rules is retarded and reeks of incest. They do this to other schools at will as well. It's time for them to stop it. Anyone who thinks we're the only target of this kind of bullshite is an idiot as well. Have we been fricked with alot in recent years? Yes. Are we the target of some conspiracy at the NCAA? No.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 1:12 pm to EasyB
quote:
What a circus in oxford. OK, so no one is placing blame on nutty but it still doesn't change the fact that he looks like a clown. Big red floppy shoes and all.
It's funny because I can picture you typing this while mouth breathing and trying to talk at the same time
Posted on 9/1/10 at 1:18 pm to lsufball19
quote:
It says a player may apply for a waiver in those circumstances. nowhere does it say a player will be automatically granted one. the rule has been posted umpteen times throughout this thread. go back and read it if you wish.
I'm curious, when you're driving on the interstate, do come to a stop after each speed limit sign, waiting for someone to tell you the speed limit again? Some things are implied based on repetitive outcomes. When you read the rule, do everything they tell you to do, file all the correct paperwork and look at similar cases in recent years, you expect a similar out come.
Posted on 9/1/10 at 1:21 pm to oklahogjr
quote:Masoli was convicted of a crime (second-degree burglary which is a Class C felony in Oregon, but they treated his conviction as a misdemeanor)... he pled guilty and received 12 months probation. He was also convicted as a juvenile and spent 3 months in juvie.
please comparing RP to this situation is ludacris. RP was a complete and total head case. The bottom line is that Masoli was a heisman contender and hadn't been convicted of any crimes. The kid had less baggage than RP if i remember correctly. Ole miss needed a qb so they went and got one.
This post was edited on 9/1/10 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 9/1/10 at 1:23 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
Masoli was convicted of a crime (second-degree burglary which is a Class C felony in Oregon, but they treated his conviction as a misdemeanor)... he pled guilty and received 12 months probation. He was also convicted as a juvenile and spent 3 months in juvie.
Read this.
Page 21 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News