Started By
Message
Mark Ingram - Weak/Strong
Posted on 12/12/09 at 12:52 am
Posted on 12/12/09 at 12:52 am
Per The Onion
2
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:00 am to ILoveLamp
Mark Ingram does not deserve the Heisman though some will try their best to give it to him as a "congratulations" to the Alabama team.
It is absurd that he is even in the final five - I can name 10 players not invited to NY that deserved it more than this guy.
That his 130 somewhat yards against Florida is being cited as the reason he should get the trophy, you have got to be kidding.
Undeserving and overrated - clearly. And while we are throwing this out there, McElroy was the player of the game, as well as the offensive star from my perspective.
It is absurd that he is even in the final five - I can name 10 players not invited to NY that deserved it more than this guy.
That his 130 somewhat yards against Florida is being cited as the reason he should get the trophy, you have got to be kidding.
Undeserving and overrated - clearly. And while we are throwing this out there, McElroy was the player of the game, as well as the offensive star from my perspective.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:02 am to Templars
This isn't a Heisman thread, take your meaningless bullshite opinion to another thread.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:03 am to ILoveLamp
quote:
I can name 10 players not invited to NY that deserved it more than this guy.
Names please
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:13 am to Templars
Quit being so butthurt. Mark Ingram was his best, against the best. You argue Mark Ingram jumped to the forefront for gaining 190 yards of total offense against Florida. Could the same argument go for Ndamukong Suh? He only had 8 sacks on the season, going into the game against Texas. Not many had him in the discussion until he nearly beat Texas himself. Regardless, Ingram, like Suh, were vital parts to the team, and deserve to be in New York for the Heisman ceremony.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:18 am to ILoveLamp
quote:
ILoveLamp
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:30 am to sorantable
But isn't he 19 not 21?
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:32 am to BamaChick
He is 21 actually, just realized this.
Born Nov. 4, 1988 (according to Wikipedia)
Born Nov. 4, 1988 (according to Wikipedia)
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:38 am to ILoveLamp
Ingram, five games with less than 100 yards 
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:39 am to Tnman
frick off, take your idiotic shite elsewhere.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:39 am to ILoveLamp
it never stops
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:52 am to ILoveLamp
Wow.
I didn't turn 21 until I was a senior. Don't see many 21 year old sophomores.
I didn't turn 21 until I was a senior. Don't see many 21 year old sophomores.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:55 am to BamaChick
Not in high school anyway
Posted on 12/12/09 at 1:57 am to BamaChick
Was he redshirted? If so, 21 would make sense.
Posted on 12/12/09 at 2:00 am to UM Rebel
Nope. True soph
Posted on 12/12/09 at 6:30 am to ILoveLamp
Wouldn't bet the farm on that being 100% right
Posted on 12/12/09 at 7:26 am to BamaFan1956
It's not. He just turned 19.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News