Started By
Message
re: LSU's first 22 is more talented than Alabama's
Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:40 pm to Magazine St
Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:40 pm to Magazine St
quote:Oh wait, I understand now. LSU fans don't realize teams are allowed to use more than 2 receivers. Of course. BTW guys, you can.
Dural and Dupre would be starters on both aTm and bama

Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:41 pm to Elleshoe
No they aren't. In fact you only have maybe four guys. Maybe. That could start on Bamas defense.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:44 pm to nc14
quote:
Yep, results just do not support this.
Did I really need to add a /s on that for you

This post was edited on 8/30/16 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:46 pm to Elleshoe
No. Because it's LSU you're talking about. They have a shitty coach.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:51 pm to Elleshoe
haha whatever you say. Dumbass L5U fan
Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:51 pm to MykTide
quote:
For some reason hg won't post it, so I will.

Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:52 pm to Magazine St
quote:
Dural and Dupre would be starters on both aTm and bama
False
Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:54 pm to hg
For some reason that is eerily similar to the Christian Bale one to me 

Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:57 pm to Elleshoe
Jesus you are immature for being such an elder here.
Regardless, Alabama's got the overall better starting 22...BUT... they're mostly confined to the OL/DL/LB and one good receiver. LSU, while having slightly less overall talent, has the better talent at your higher profile positions such as RB, DB, etc.. hence the hope from the LSU faithful.....should make for a great matchup
Regardless, Alabama's got the overall better starting 22...BUT... they're mostly confined to the OL/DL/LB and one good receiver. LSU, while having slightly less overall talent, has the better talent at your higher profile positions such as RB, DB, etc.. hence the hope from the LSU faithful.....should make for a great matchup
Posted on 8/30/16 at 8:59 pm to AshLSU
Having better receivers does not matter if you don't have a passing game to get them the ball.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:02 pm to Elleshoe
No, Bama has more overall talent on the 1st and 2nd groups. The only group that favors L5U is RB. OL Bama, WR Bama, TE Bama, DLINE, LB and DBS Bama.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:03 pm to skrayper
quote:L5U has WR's? News to me.
Alabama is in the conversation for the best WR corps in the SEC this year. LSU isn't.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:14 pm to BAMAneck
quote:in all three major sports head to head. And it isn't even close.
BAMA > LSU
And our athletic department funds>>>>>>>>>>lsu
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:29 pm to TT9
OP is kind of dumb for this thread. As very talented as LSU is, you can't say it's more talented than Alabama considering they have the #1 recruiting class every year and have won like 4 championships in the past 7 or so years.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:37 pm to BAMAneck
LSU >>>> Alabama
Welp, my work here is done.
Welp, my work here is done.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:41 pm to Elleshoe
Football is won in the trenches, and unfortunately, bama is probably more talented in the trenches.
Posted on 8/30/16 at 9:44 pm to texag7
I'll bet you $100 Adams and Fournette go first round
Back to top
