Started By
Message
re: LSU 1st team in SEC history to have a 3000-yd QB, 1000-yd RB, 2 1000-yd WR's
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:30 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:30 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
we bring back more than Bama does just FYI
No you don't.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
we bring back more than Bama does just FYI
Not based on offensive production you don't.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:31 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:
4-8 TCU
4-8 UF
8-5 UGA
Hardcore brah.
You're right we lucked out not having to play Kentucky or Tennessee.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:32 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
We're on a winning streak 

Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:35 pm to Alonzo
While irrelevant, it is indeed factual.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:37 pm to constant cough
quote:
Imagine if they would have had Bama's schedule.
The only significant difference between LSU's schedule and Bama's is that LSU played 8-5 UGA and Bama did not. You still lost to Ole Miss and got destroyed by Bama. Beat the teams you are supposed to beat (like Ole Miss) and beat Alabama head to head, and all this schedule argument BS won't matter.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:37 pm to BamaDoc14
You're still thoroughly rustled.
I'm impressed.
I'm impressed.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:38 pm to BamaDoc14
The reason they went 10-3 last year was because the defense was horrible. And I thought prior to 2013 those guys were garbage. Now they are gods that LSU can't replace. This board is hilarious
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:39 pm to Monticello
You're right. Beating OOC teams with your second string is equivalent to playing teams with a pulse.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:41 pm to dkreller
quote:
You're right. Beating OOC teams with your second string is equivalent to playing teams with a pulse.
Huh? LSU played a 4-8 TCU, Furman, Kent St, and UAB in non con? That's as bad as a non conference schedule gets. Your East opponents went 8-5 and 4-8. LSU's schedule was not that tough. You just lost games.
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:43 pm to BamaDoc14
And went 13-1 without that offensive production. Lsu lost to bama, auburn lost to fsu, and bama has never beaten a top ten ranked auburn team.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:45 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:To be fair, 2014 LSU is nowhere near as talented as 2011 LSU...
And went 13-1 without that offensive production.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:45 pm to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:
bama has never beaten a top ten ranked auburn team

This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:46 pm to constant cough
quote:
Imagine if they would have had Bama's schedule.
10-3
This post was edited on 7/16/14 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:46 pm to Monticello
quote:
The only significant difference between LSU's schedule and Bama's is that LSU played 8-5 UGA and Bama did not.
That's a pretty big difference unless your are certain that Bama would have beaten UGA. Your game a few months earlier against them kinda makes me think it wouldn't have been a cakewalk for Bama.
quote:
You still lost to Ole Miss and got destroyed by Bama. Beat the teams you are supposed to beat (like Ole Miss) and beat Alabama head to head, and all this schedule argument BS won't matter.
And you still lost to Auburn who I'm sure you think you're supposed to beat. And I don't recall getting destroyed by Bama I remember the game being fairly close in the 3rd quarter then Bama pulled away, but whatever you make a fair point.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:48 pm to BamaDoc14
Southern Miss has a better winning streak than you.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:50 pm to GCTiger11
and anyways all your title thread tells me is that we had great offensive production this year. Did you forget you have to play defense too?
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:51 pm to Monticello
quote:
Huh? LSU played a 4-8 TCU, Furman, Kent St, and UAB in non con? That's as bad as a non conference schedule gets. Your East opponents went 8-5 and 4-8. LSU's schedule was not that tough. You just lost games.
VT, Colorado St., Georgia St., and Chattanooga isn't much better a non conference schedule and your East opponents went 5-7 and 2-10. Bama's schedule was not tough either but yeah Bama beat LSU head to head so yeah LSU really has nothing else to blame.
I just like taking schedule shots and Bama cause you guys are so easy to troll with it.
Posted on 7/16/14 at 6:55 pm to TTsTowel
The 2014 talent is on par with the 2011 talent at every position for the exception of dline. This year the linebackers are better. WR talent is the same, RB is the same, QB is upgrade. The problem is there was more experience at those positions. OL will ease the pain for the younger guys.
Back to top
