Started By
Message

re: Louisiana Highschool State Championship game early celebration penalty.

Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:08 pm to
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
13822 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

BamaBravesPackers


For the love of God, can you please, somehow, not feel that you have to have the last word.
Posted by BamaBravesPackers
Member since Nov 2021
7816 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

You are focused on the timeout. It does not matter


An incorrect call that changed the winner of a game “does not matter?”

quote:

Even if that was a bad call you still can properly close out the game with two UNDER CENTER kneel downs and a well executed punt. That is all on coaching. Calls go against you. Good coaching and execution overcomes that.


Well, yeah, I already ranked the order of the inexcusable things that happened including the refs botched call being the third item (and that’s only assuming they don’t have access to video replays. If they have replay, then refs botched call goes to #1). You continue to argue it was the correct call when it wasn’t. I’ve blamed the coach, player, punter, and the refs.
Posted by BamaBravesPackers
Member since Nov 2021
7816 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

For the love of God, can you please, somehow, not feel that you have to have the last word.


Sorry, I’m having fun watching Wolf try to ignore the rules and video facts in 100 different ways to avoid admitting the refs botched it. Feel free to not click on the thread.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126011 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:18 pm to
It was the correct call. It was a penalty. Your issue is the order of the timeout. The referee made the call on the field and his decision was to refuse to accept the timeout from St Charles. That is his prerogative. He is in charge of the officiating crew, not the sideline judge.
Posted by BamaBravesPackers
Member since Nov 2021
7816 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

That is his prerogative.


He has the prerogative to not follow the official rule book of when a timeout is granted?

I think we’ve found the root difference. I wasn’t aware you thought he had the power to interpret the rules and timing of timeouts outside of the official rule book. Agree to disagree, I guess
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126011 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:25 pm to
The rule you cited earlier says he has to accept the timeout. He refused it.
Posted by BamaBravesPackers
Member since Nov 2021
7816 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

The rule you cited earlier says he has to accept the timeout. He refused it.


Friend, my post never even used the word “accept.” It used the word “granted,” and I’ve already told you the exact definition of the word “granted” in the rule book.
This post was edited on 12/15/25 at 9:36 pm
Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
13822 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

Friend

Have you been diagnosed?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
126011 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

granted
He did not grant it.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21628 posts
Posted on 12/15/25 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

For the love of God, can you please, somehow, not feel that you have to have the last word.


Seems he cant. Basically derailed the entire thread
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter