Started By
Message
re: LOL: Ole Miss 20 vs. Auburn 33 FINAL
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:29 pm to Robot Santa
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:29 pm to Robot Santa
Question. Does the review booth have the exact same footage as the TV crew? If so, I couldn't tell if it hit the ground or not
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:29 pm to auburn2009
quote:
Ole Messers already coming up with an excuse if they drop the game..
Yeah. Because Ole Miss will definitely lose this game.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:29 pm to bmy
quote:
definitely wasn't an INT
quote:
Didn't think it was conclusive
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:29 pm to auburn2009
Holy shite. 50 cent corndogs? 
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:29 pm to Robot Santa
McCluster is a baaaaddd man.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:30 pm to auburn2009
quote:
Ole Messers already coming up with an excuse if they drop the game..
No excuses besides us sucking if we lose this game.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:30 pm to ILoveLamp
Holy shite, a complete pass?!
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:30 pm to EagleCM
quote:
Question. Does the review booth have the exact same footage as the TV crew?
Yes
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:32 pm to arrakis
quote:
Yes
Can they zoom in or use magnifying glasses?
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:33 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
Can they zoom in or use magnifying glasses?
No
Replay system is a piece of shite
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:33 pm to inelishaitrust
quote:
magnifying glasses?
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:33 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Alahunter
I think it makes sense
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:34 pm to inelishaitrust
The only angle I saw that looked like it hit the ground was from downfield, defensive side. It looked like the ball hit the ground between his forearms. No other angle appeared that way.
I didn't think it should be overturned, but maybe they saw something I didn't. They only seemed to show the above replay once.
I didn't think it should be overturned, but maybe they saw something I didn't. They only seemed to show the above replay once.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:34 pm to arrakis
quote:
No
Replay system is a piece of shite
no joke.
you can't overturn that Int.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:35 pm to bmy
quote:
I think it makes sense It definitely wasn't an INT, but the replay that we saw was not conclusive -- so the call stands.
The only problem with that, is that it was called an INT and it was overturned on inconclusive replays.
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:36 pm to Alahunter
I think ESPN lost their graphics
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:36 pm to Alahunter
I know they are NOT playing sandstorm. 
Posted on 10/31/09 at 12:38 pm to Alahunter
quote:
The only problem with that, is that it was called an INT and it was overturned on inconclusive replays.
Exactly.
Popular
Back to top


1




