Started By
Message
re: Let’s assume Tua had started the CFP NC game...
Posted on 7/25/18 at 11:20 am to DawgsLife
Posted on 7/25/18 at 11:20 am to DawgsLife
quote:
So, you want to sub in players but nobdody else can?
On the same team in the same system. It worked. That is what you call an apples to apples comparison.
Do you understand what I posted now? Trying to sub Tua for Mayfield who plays on a differently built team with a different system makes zero sense. None.
Yes we won the game. Loved every minute watching yet another Kirby blown lead. Sounds just like the guy he replaced
1
Posted on 7/25/18 at 11:22 am to djsdawg
quote:
it did much more damage to our defense than yours did.
because we were handicapped by a very limited QB for a half of football. Which is the topic of this thread that it is very likely had Tua started the game the score would have been something like 45-20 or so. We won't know. Regardless what we do know is Georgia choked and it was actually Alabama that made the adjustments to win the game.
This post was edited on 7/25/18 at 11:26 am
Posted on 7/25/18 at 12:49 pm to Dawgy49
quote:
Bammer benefited more from an inept officiating crew than they did Tua!
Closeted corndog...
Posted on 7/25/18 at 12:53 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
On the same team in the same system. It worked. That is what you call an apples to apples comparison.
No. It is called, "I'm going to try to change history to make my team look better."
It isn't enough to point to what actually happened? You have to try to say, "What if...."?
Okay. I'll play and let's see how it works.
"Let's assume Georgia won the National Championship game!"
See how stupid it is? It didn't happen, so why play "What if..."?
Posted on 7/25/18 at 12:54 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
because we were handicapped by a very limited QB for a half of football.
It was one half of an entire season.
If he handicapped you so much, you need to make an appointment with Nick Saban and tell him you don't like the way he handles the team.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 12:59 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
Bama - 40
UGA - 14
Nice try.
Something more realistic would have been 42-3.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:30 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
If he handicapped you so much, you need to make an appointment with Nick Saban and tell him you don't like the way he handles the team
he figured it out. Which is why he made the change at Halftime. Tua is our starter. The only people on here that want it to be Hurts are Auburn, LSU, or Georgia fans. For obvious reasons.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 1:32 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
"Let's assume Georgia won the National Championship game!"
Georgia had their once in a lifetime chance and blew it. Maybe in another 35 years you will get back and win.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 3:02 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Like you guys adjusted in overtime, I totally agree.
I said halftime.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 3:09 pm to _Hurricane_
You took the bait before any UGA kiddo did ha.
Getting defensive before a comment is even made...Impressive.
Getting defensive before a comment is even made...Impressive.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 4:46 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Oh. that’s not true. It’s a dumb point. Halftime =/= overtime.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 4:50 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
because we were handicapped by a very limited QB for a half of football. Which is the topic of this thread that it is very likely had Tua started the game the score would have been something like 45-20 or so. We won't know. Regardless what we do know is Georgia choked and it was actually Alabama that made the adjustments to win the game.
No, I am not even talking about hurts.
The ou performance in half 1 was much better than bama’s performance in half 2.
Halftime adjustments enabled us to shut down a much better offense, so it makes sense to think we could have had similar success with a halftime to adjust to Tua.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 4:57 pm to Eli Goldfinger
Baker Mayfield was way better at the end of the 17 season than Tua was at the same time....
We beat Mayfield....starting Tua would have given us plenty of time. Not to mention one of his TD passes was the benefit of a wr starting way before the ball snapped.
We beat Mayfield....starting Tua would have given us plenty of time. Not to mention one of his TD passes was the benefit of a wr starting way before the ball snapped.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 5:24 pm to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
It is the sole reason why you lost the game.
Some lucky breaks/calls, breakdowns on Off and def on the part of UGA from getting a bit conservative and letting pressure affect them, plus production from N. Harris and a handful of other freshman helped as well. Bama had 5 true freshmen on the field at multiple points.
But, to the other topic. Yes, CKS would have adjusted to Tua at halftime. However, I also think we would have seen the intro of Jalen in the second half to stay ahead of the adjustments and keep them off balance.
It is a truly great dual QB situation UA has if they can manage it well.
This post was edited on 7/25/18 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 7/25/18 at 5:34 pm to Che Boludo
It tua had a good first half, I doubt saban takes him out.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 5:46 pm to djsdawg
It's not baseball. I'm not saying he is benched, but I guarantee he'd do it to:
A. Create multiple dilemmas for the UGA D to counteract adjustments and maintain momentum
B. Reward the QB1 who led the team all year by providing packages in situations that better fit his skillset
A. Create multiple dilemmas for the UGA D to counteract adjustments and maintain momentum
B. Reward the QB1 who led the team all year by providing packages in situations that better fit his skillset
Posted on 7/25/18 at 5:52 pm to Che Boludo
Hurts just isn’t good enough to warrant such a move. The only reason he made the move to qb2 to begin with was because of that.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 6:06 pm to thatthang
It happen after the AU loss
Posted on 7/25/18 at 8:23 pm to Eli Goldfinger
quote:... Hurts would be sitting out a year at some other fine school.
Let’s assume Tua had started the CFP NC game...
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News