Started By
Message
re: Leo Lewis $10,000 story is jacked up
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:45 pm to Vecchio Cane
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:45 pm to Vecchio Cane
quote:
Tell that to Barney and his legal counsel. No wonder he's pissed off and ready to sue
If OM thought they could hang this whole deal on Barney and walk away, I have some beachfront property in Odessa TX to sell them.
Freeze has been visiting every church, synagogue, temple, mosque in the state of Mississippi for the past two years for the "I'm a nice guy and I would never do anything dishonest" plea.
They could of gotten away with it if they would have paid Farrar off with some big bucks.
1
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:47 pm to Henry Jones Jr
No, but y'all can't prove hard facts. Y'all have lied from day 1, I expected nothing to change.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:48 pm to HottyToddy7
Ole Miss has already admitted they cheated and cheated bigly. Youre screwed.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:48 pm to BobLeeDagger
quote:The time stamped work emails from the accused booster proving he was at his office working rather than where the recruit said he was is pretty hard evidence.
No, but y'all can't prove hard facts.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:49 pm to msstate7
quote:
You're concerned with the Leo part when your university is fighting LOIC by saying, well we can't control an assistant coach
This is uninformed bull shite. The argument against the LOIC is that Freeze and the university went above and beyond to comply with NCAA regulations. If you educated and tell boosters about the rules over and over again, and they decide to break them, what more could Freeze do? Yes the University should get punished but you can't punish Freeze who did all he could just because of the number of violations, while he complied above and beyond with every compliance and preventive measure the NCAA had.
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:50 pm to Henry Jones Jr
This conspiracy theory is getting out of hand
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:51 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:Disassociate and report them to the NCAA
what more could Freeze do?
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:51 pm to BobLeeDagger
The conspiracy theory is on your side. We actually have it down on paper in a document. Your side is made up of message board hero's and innuendo.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:52 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Disassociate and report them to the NCAA
Which was done...
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:52 pm to HottyToddy7
This post was edited on 6/6/17 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:52 pm to HottyToddy7
I know
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:52 pm to HottyToddy7
Sounds like he got more money to change his story the second time around.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:53 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
If his testimony is thrown out, we get what we have already self imposed.
Umm. No. Count the level 1's again and even subtract that particular one if you like.
And didn't ole miss confirm payment was made by not disputing it happened? If Leo claims the payment was given to him on the face of Everest, but Ole Miss doesn't dispute payment was made, what's the debate? Payment is payment.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:54 pm to junkfunky
quote:
Sounds like he got more money to change his story the second time around.
Or he had to account for how he got 10K and decided to throw it on OM instead of where it really came from.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:55 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
And didn't ole miss confirm payment was made by not disputing it happened?
No.
From the NOA
quote:
Setting aside the issue of motive, Allegations 16-(b) and 16-(c) present an important question for the Committee to answer: does an allegation of cash payments need corroboration beyond a general and inconsistent account of wrongdoing from a biased witness for the Committee to find a violation? While the University is troubled by the contacts between [Student-Athlete 39], [Booster 12], and [Booster 14] and by Farrar’s role in their involvement, the University suggests that evidence of such contacts cannot, by itself, corroborate [Student- Athlete 39’s] claims of cash payments. To find that [Booster 14] and [Booster 12] made cash payments to [Student-Athlete 39] requires some reliable corroboration of those payments, particularly where [Student- Athlete 39’s] accounts are void of detail, inconsistent, and untouched by any probing party
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:56 pm to agswin
quote:
If OM thought they could hang this whole deal on Barney and walk away, I have some beachfront property in Odessa TX to sell them.
They HAVE to pin it on him. If they dont have a fall guy then it goes back to Reverend Freeze. It is such a risky tactic, if Barney gets pissed he can start singing. What if he had notes, or God forbid a tape, of Freeze. Then there are the disassociated boosters.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:57 pm to HottyToddy7
"It can't be true, cause he said it and we don't agree"
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:58 pm to HottyToddy7
You think the NCAA needs corroboration of an allegation for them to use it against you. That is so cute!
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:58 pm to StopRobot
It is definitely the most risky. No doubt. But if you have to risk it to kill the LOIC and the allegations of Freeze not doing everything he could to boaster an environment of compliance and prevention based on NCAA guidelines, which is the case they are making.
Posted on 6/6/17 at 4:59 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
It is definitely the most risky. No doubt. But if you have to risk it to kill the LOIC and the allegations of Freeze not doing everything he could to boaster an environment of compliance and prevention based on NCAA guidelines, which is the case they are making.
Boosters
Administration
Multiple Players
Multiple Allegations
Good luck with that
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News