Started By
Message
re: Is there any reasoning to this?
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:42 am to Victor R Franko
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:42 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
Espn, 2, U, news, sec net
B10 network, cbsnet, fs1, 2, acc,
Man, yttv has all you need for college football.
Should I verify that Hulu has all these too or does someone already know.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:43 am to MtVernon
FUBO TV is the way if you’re any kind of a sports fan. You can watch local sports, and they also have the same programming YouTube TV has.
And you can choose your own multi-view instead of just what youtube offers. Its’s pricier, and I originally switched to Fubo to watch the Astros. Now I keep it all year. There’s always something on.
And you can choose your own multi-view instead of just what youtube offers. Its’s pricier, and I originally switched to Fubo to watch the Astros. Now I keep it all year. There’s always something on.
This post was edited on 9/4/24 at 9:46 am
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:43 am to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
copy his post into ChatGPT

Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:53 am to Wellborn
FYI, You can also build your own multiview in YouTube TV.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:54 am to Victor R Franko
quote:Good to know. Thanks.
FYI, You can also build your own multiview in YouTube TV.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:54 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
Don't trust any of these SEC knuckleheads, just me.
Go verify yourself!
Use this to see networks needed.
Why didn't you just send him to the shorthorn network?
Posted on 9/4/24 at 9:55 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
Don't trust any of these SEC knuckleheads, just me.
This thread has given me new hope in the character of fellow posters. Much appreciated.
Alright you bastages, back to it!

This post was edited on 9/4/24 at 9:57 am
Posted on 9/4/24 at 10:02 am to bamameister
Stay in the truck Bama, I'll get the gate.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 10:34 am to Tiger_Claw
quote:Thanks for posting this.
Tiger_Claw
Your neighbor's experience might be influenced by a few technical factors that can affect how different streaming services perform with limited internet speeds. While both Hulu and YouTubeTV are similar in terms of what they provide, they may handle internet speeds differently due to several reasons:
Posted on 9/4/24 at 10:38 am to Tiger_Claw
quote:
Your neighbor's experience might be influenced by a few technical factors that can affect how different streaming services perform with limited internet speeds. While both Hulu and YouTubeTV are similar in terms of what they provide, they may handle internet speeds differently due to several reasons: Video Compression & Streaming Quality: Hulu and YouTubeTV may use different video compression technologies. Some services are more aggressive in reducing the video quality to adjust for lower speeds, which could make Hulu feel more stable on a slow connection. If Hulu lowers the resolution or bitrate more effectively, it may stream more smoothly than YouTubeTV, even if the overall speed is the same. Adaptive Streaming: Both services use adaptive streaming, which means they adjust the video quality based on your connection. However, they might handle fluctuating speeds differently. If Hulu responds quicker to drops in internet speed, that could explain why it seems more stable in your neighbor’s experience. Data Usage Management: Different services optimize how they use bandwidth. If Hulu has better optimization or uses less data for the same quality compared to YouTubeTV, it may appear to perform better with slower internet. Server Location and Latency: Sometimes, the location of the servers you're connecting to can impact performance. If Hulu’s servers are geographically closer or have better routing for your region, the data may get to you faster, resulting in smoother playback compared to YouTubeTV. Device Compatibility: Some devices handle different streaming services better. If your neighbor is using a device that is better optimized for Hulu over YouTubeTV, that could also impact performance. Both services should theoretically perform similarly with the same internet speed, but slight differences in how they handle video compression, buffering, or server connections can make one feel better than the other in certain environments.
nerd
Posted on 9/4/24 at 10:48 am to MtVernon
I have never had much luck streaming directly from a smart tv...I've found it more reliable to use a Google chromecast plugged into the hdmi and cast from a phone or tablet to the tv...and you can get around password sharing if you're playing from a mobile device. Everyone in my family has the same setup and we all chip in like 30 bucks and get every channel and the premium ones also.
This post was edited on 9/4/24 at 11:03 am
Posted on 9/4/24 at 11:02 am to MtVernon
I had DISH at the farm and they were going to $150 a month when my 2 year plan ran out. They would not negotiate. I had CSpire internet and TV at home. Switched to YouTubeTV and put in a Hughesnet satellite dish at the farm. YouTubeTV goes anywhere so I save probably $100 per month with the switch. The download speed is good (usually around 180 mbps) but the upload is slow. Frustrating to use a computer sometimes but overall, quite pleased with the switch. But I can't answer your question about HULU v. YouTubeTV.
Posted on 9/4/24 at 11:31 am to paperwasp
quote:
random buffering
You said random buffering.

Popular
Back to top
