Started By
Message
re: Is Texas A&M that good?
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:02 am to Pigimus Prime
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:02 am to Pigimus Prime
Whodathunk the female would be the logical one? 
1
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:22 am to aggiegirl2005
What's up with VC today? Dude is HELL BENT on proving that A&M is a pretender and not worthy of any national pub that they are getting. Did he walk in on some corps guys running a train on his sister or something?
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:27 am to Phil Wenneck
quote:
What's up with VC today? Dude is HELL BENT on proving that A&M is a pretender and not worthy of any national pub that they are getting. Did he walk in on some corps guys running a train on his sister or something?
When Texas A&M does something to deserve national pub (which they aren't getting much of btw...seeing how they aren't even ranked) then I'll be the first to admit I was wrong. When they finish 7-5 after a 5-1 start, I probably won't even come back and say I told you so...probably. What is funny is people like you actually thinking you are a contender after beating Arkansas.....South Carolina St., and SMU.....you guys are the new arkansas fanbase....just when we thought we had gotten rid of that delusion. I wish some of you schools could win a championship so you could be a lot more realistic on here. For the most part, Florida, LSU, Alabama, and even Auburn fans are pretty realistic......then you have the arkansas (pre-season) and A&M (current season) delusional fans.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:28 am to VC
Please quote any post where I label A&M as a contender. I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:29 am to DWag215
quote:
Based on what we've seen this year, there's nothing suggesting we're a bad team. Conversely, given how we've beaten our opponents -- that is, how we should -- it's much easier to claim we're a pretty decent squad.
so just to make sure I understand....you beat some TERRIBLE teams, and that makes you pretty good. Hell, Ole Miss beat tulane by 50 points......they pretty good too?
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:30 am to Phil Wenneck
quote:
Please quote any post where I label A&M as a contender.
you took exception to where I implied that you were a "pretender".....you are either a contender or a pretender. When you take exception to being called a pretender, one would think that implies that you think you are an actual contender. Common logic...but hell, what do I know right.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:30 am to VC
quote:
Ban bet accepted. LSU beats A&M, you are banned the rest of the college football season. A&M beats LSU, I will be ban myself the rest of the year.
Well alrighty then. I guess you might actually have a pair afterall.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:31 am to VC
So...
7-5 = realistic.
8-4 = DELUSION, HOLY HELL Y'ALL SETTLE THE frick DOWN AND LOOK AT REALITY. REALITY!
If the majority of our fanbase is declaring we'll go 10-2 or some shite like that, I'd agree that's delusional. But I haven't seen that.
7-5 = realistic.
8-4 = DELUSION, HOLY HELL Y'ALL SETTLE THE frick DOWN AND LOOK AT REALITY. REALITY!
If the majority of our fanbase is declaring we'll go 10-2 or some shite like that, I'd agree that's delusional. But I haven't seen that.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:34 am to VC
That whole "assume" thing....
I've had A&M's season pegged as a 5-7 to 8-4 result, with losses to the SECw powers and AU and State.
What you are calling "delusion" is actual a general sense of surprise at the fact that our freshman QB and new coach haven't completely shite all over themselves this season.
I've had A&M's season pegged as a 5-7 to 8-4 result, with losses to the SECw powers and AU and State.
What you are calling "delusion" is actual a general sense of surprise at the fact that our freshman QB and new coach haven't completely shite all over themselves this season.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:35 am to aggiegirl2005
VC, are you just butthurt over what A&M did to LSU the last several regular season games we played?
Sep. 2 1995 L17-33 College Station
Sep. 3 1994 L13-18 Baton Rouge
Sep. 4 1993 L0-24 College Station
Sep. 5 1992 L22-31 Baton Rouge
Sep. 14 1991 L7-45 College Station
Man, you sure do hold grudges for a long time.
Sep. 2 1995 L17-33 College Station
Sep. 3 1994 L13-18 Baton Rouge
Sep. 4 1993 L0-24 College Station
Sep. 5 1992 L22-31 Baton Rouge
Sep. 14 1991 L7-45 College Station
Man, you sure do hold grudges for a long time.
This post was edited on 10/2/12 at 10:38 am
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:35 am to aggiegirl2005
quote:
7-5 = realistic.
8-4 = DELUSION, HOLY HELL Y'ALL SETTLE THE frick DOWN AND LOOK AT REALITY. REALITY!
Pretty much what I've gathered. Spectacular thread.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:38 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
Guys, be careful with VC. Dude's the MF'in LAW and will smash all forms of delusion on the rant. You're either contending for the SEC title, or a giant pile of elephant shite.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:45 am to VC
Holy shite VC....you are a freaking phsyco!!! 
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:45 am to AgDuckHunter
quote:
VC, are you just butthurt over what A&M did to LSU the last several regular season games we played?
Are you aware LSU didn't make a bowl game from 91-94? They sucked
1991, 5-6 record
1992, 2-9 record
1993, 5-6 record
1994, 4-7 record
This post was edited on 10/2/12 at 10:48 am
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:45 am to Phil Wenneck
VC sounds like a transgendered hog fan in Tiger clothing.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:49 am to Darth Slive
I think you're on to something....did Sao or wmr or pigimus change their name?
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:54 am to VC
quote:
When Texas A&M does something to deserve national pub (which they aren't getting much of btw...seeing how they aren't even ranked) then I'll be the first to admit I was wrong.
Looks like we are getting a little national pub
Posted on 10/2/12 at 11:10 am to joe.liberst
I didn't get it either at first, but now it makes sense.
VC is just concerned about unrealistic expectations (that were never actually offered), and decided to make a public service announcement so that Aggies don't get their hopes up for the remainder of the season. Unlike other SEC schools, Aggies should be most vigilant and guard against feeling happy with the teams' performance so far.
Thanks again!
VC is just concerned about unrealistic expectations (that were never actually offered), and decided to make a public service announcement so that Aggies don't get their hopes up for the remainder of the season. Unlike other SEC schools, Aggies should be most vigilant and guard against feeling happy with the teams' performance so far.
Thanks again!
Posted on 10/2/12 at 11:18 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
I don't think VC has had to endure the past decade of aggie football, otherwise he would be singing a different tune right now
Posted on 10/2/12 at 11:26 am to AgDuckHunter
quote:
Well alrighty then. I guess you might actually have a pair afterall.
you obviously have a better pair though, since you are a double digit underdog.....I admire the pride.....hope you have an alias already lined up.
Page 19 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News