Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:08 pm to ronricks
quote:
Nearly
Do you really think you are proving it’s easy? Because you didn’t. Instead, you proved how much luck is involved. Good work.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:12 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Do you really think you are proving it’s easy? Because you didn’t. Instead, you proved how much luck is involved. Good work.
It's "luck" that that many teams some of them multiple times have won a NC?
What kind of Georgia logic is that? "Luck" isn't the answer for your failures. Look around you almost all your rivals have one since 1980.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:15 pm to ronricks
quote:Good for them, but this is just another way of alluding to how easy it is to win one, and it's not.
Nearly every school surrounding Georgia has won a NC since you last won one (some of them have done it multiple times)
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:21 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Good for them, but this is just another way of alluding to how easy it is to win one, and it's not.
Georgia simply isn't a National Championship caliber program. 1980 is very real and it isn't going to change. You hired a guy that is a carbon copy of your last guy that you fired for not being able to win a National Championship. In fact the guy you hired (Kirby) won more with the last guys (Richt) lower rated recruits than his own higher rated recruits. What does that tell us?
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:28 pm to ronricks
quote:
It's "luck" that that many teams some of them multiple times have won a NC?
Most of the examples involved luck just to get a MNC shot, yet you don’t seem to even know it. It’s as if you don’t have a strong recollection of football history.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:35 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Most of the examples involved luck just to get a MNC shot, yet you don’t seem to even know it. It’s as if you don’t have a strong recollection of football history.
"luck" isn't the reason for your rivals successes and Georgia's failures. You can keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better but it isn't reality.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:43 pm to ronricks
Only a person who struggles with memories and/or basic understanding of CFB can claim luck hasn’t played a role in most of these.
Compare uga 2002 with LSU 2003 for instance. Tell me what you remember about those teams and their MNC shots. What made the difference?
Compare uga 2002 with LSU 2003 for instance. Tell me what you remember about those teams and their MNC shots. What made the difference?
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:51 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Compare uga 2002 with LSU 2003 for instance. Tell me what you remember about those teams and their MNC shots. What made the difference?
2003 LSU beat Georgia twice
It wasn't "luck" that LSU went 13-1 and beat OU in the National Championship Game.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 2:57 pm to ronricks
quote:
2003 LSU beat Georgia twice
What? LSU 2003 did not play uga 2002 even once, much less twice. It’s literally impossible for such a thing to occur.
(This is going to take forever if you are struggling this badly with such a basic example.)
So, again, why did only one of these 2 teams get a mnc shot?
This post was edited on 4/28/21 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 4/28/21 at 3:05 pm to ronricks
quote:
Look around you almost all your rivals have one since 1980.
They added UofSC as a rival so they could have a rival that doesn’t
Posted on 4/28/21 at 3:39 pm to ronricks
quote:
In fact, Kirby did better with Richt's leftover players than he has done with his own recruits.
Is that so? A strong argument can be made that our 2018 team was better than our 2017 team when comparing the regular season plus bama championship games.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 3:58 pm to ronricks
quote:Most programs aren't National Championship caliber programs until they win one, and even then, the programs may go in and out of that distinction over time. There are few programs out there today that are consistently in contention for the playoffs, and UGA is one of them. Will that mean we will win it? No, but no one is guaranteed a win because it's not easy.
Georgia simply isn't a National Championship caliber program.
quote:Do you know the future? It's fun to poke fun at fans but "1980" isn't a rational argument. It's typically used as a red herring to distract from the conversation rather than add to it and what happened in 1980 has no bearing on whether or not a team will win a championship in 2021.
1980 is very real and it isn't going to change.
quote:You know how I know you haven't been paying attention to UGA football?
You hired a guy that is a carbon copy of your last guy that you fired for not being able to win a National Championship.
Smart is not a carbon copy of Richt.
quote:Not much, actually.
In fact the guy you hired (Kirby) won more with the last guys (Richt) lower rated recruits than his own higher rated recruits. What does that tell us?
Smart didn't have great success in 2016 with Richt's recruits. He had good success in 2017 and 2018 with a combination of Richt's and Smart's recruits. He had some success in 2019 with mostly his own recruits but fell short against the juggernaut of LSU. 2020 was a strange year altogether with COVID, injuries, and a QB carrousel.
I don't know if Smart will win a championship at UGA, but what's for certain is that we're in contention every year and he's still recruiting the players we need to make it happen. It's ignorant to say otherwise.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 6:26 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Smart is not a carbon copy of Richt.
But the results are the same. So a mirror image?
Posted on 4/28/21 at 7:01 pm to Smokeyone
I don’t remember Richt taking us to a Natty. Weird
Posted on 4/28/21 at 7:03 pm to Smokeyone
quote:
But the results are the same. So a mirror image?
Through 5 seasons Richt had 2 SEC championships and was able to beat Nick Saban. Kirby has one and can’t beat Nick Saban. Richt’s first 5 seasons are actually better than Kirby. The Georgia fans just don’t want to admit why all their rivals have a more recent National Championship some of them multiple times. Georgia is a second rate perineal underachiever.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 7:04 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
I don’t remember Richt taking us to a Natty. Weird
Which you lost. And you have one playoff appearance total. Same as Michigan State which makes sense because Georgia is the Michigan State of the south.
Posted on 4/28/21 at 7:12 pm to djsdawg
quote:
What? LSU 2003 did not play uga 2002 even once, much less twice. It’s literally impossible for such a thing to occur.
Never said they did. I don’t recall UgA’s lackluster 2002 season. I do recall LSU’s 2003 National Championship season. Georgia isn’t a National Championship program. They are the Michigan State of the South. Very little actual championship history when compared to their rivals. That’s just something you are going to have to cope with. No amount of excuses will ever change that.
This post was edited on 4/28/21 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 4/28/21 at 7:17 pm to ronricks
quote:
Never said they did. I don’t recall UgA’s lackluster 2002 season.
So you even admit to being as clueless about football as I accused you of.
Since you admit to not knowing football, let’s compare the 2:
Uga 2002 and LSU 2003 both went 13-1 with a loss to Ron zook.
Only one was lucky enough to get a MNC shot. Hmmm. Luck is very important isn’t it?
Posted on 4/28/21 at 7:21 pm to djsdawg
quote:
So you even admit to being as clueless about football as I accused you of.
Since you admit to not knowing football, let’s compare the 2:
Uga 2002 and LSU 2003 both went 13-1 with a loss to Ron zook.
Only one was lucky enough to get a MNC shot. Hmmm. Luck is very important isn’t it?
Losing to Ron Zook team from Florida is not a good look for UGA.
This post was edited on 4/28/21 at 7:28 pm
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News