Started By
Message
re: Is Arkansas a worse fit for the SEC than TAMU or Mizzou?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 3:22 pm to Gcockboi
Posted on 10/18/13 at 3:22 pm to Gcockboi
quote:
The state of Arkansas is in the Southeast. Texas is in the Southwest, Arky is a much, much better fit than Mizzou, Atm and Kentucky tbh.
Texas is in Texas. We are too big to be a part of a region.
Also, you are welcome we could not come in the 90s.
SC: 47th best athletic department.
TAMU: 5th
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
This post was edited on 10/18/13 at 3:25 pm
1
Posted on 10/18/13 at 3:31 pm to jrodan
It's not Dinosaur ball jackass, the SEC is loaded with QB talent. The SEC will be back to it's bread and butter next year. If there is a reason Bielema won't succeed with his power running game in the SEC it's because LSU, BAMA, and the other traditional run dominant teams will already have the best power RB's or RB's in general there are to have. He won't have the talent to execute that scheme because those players aren't going to Arky until they re establish themselves a power again. Arkansas was a pain in the arse before Petrino started riding scooters around with hot volleyball players on them so, can they get back? yes! will it be with bielema? Not sure!
Posted on 10/18/13 at 4:07 pm to BigD Ag
quote:
Also, you are welcome we could not come in the 90s.
Yeah no shite.
You would think USCe fans would get through their heads that A&M is the only reason they are in the SEC right now. We take the invite after Arky and they are an AAC team today.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 4:48 pm to cardboardboxer
Yep. They should be kissing our feet.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 5:17 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
South Carolina has always been a weird fit for me. If it wasn't for Spurrier, I would forget they even exist.
Yeah. It's clear the way they came out of the woodwork to shoot down North Carolina in that one UNC to SEC thread, that they have a severe case of latent Little Brother Syndrome.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News