Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:13 pm to SmokeTide
Then WHO/WHAT is Ala. giving up:
Tn. & TSIO
or
Aub. & IB
???
Tn. & TSIO
or
Aub. & IB
???
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:15 pm to bamagreycoat
Was it fair when TN kept beating Ala.?
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:18 pm to Arksulli
There are 4 (maybe 6) teams who want to KEEP them.
There is NO ROTATION that allows some to stay & others go.
Also, they WON'T be played as non-conf..
There is NO ROTATION that allows some to stay & others go.
Also, they WON'T be played as non-conf..
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:20 pm to Lonnie Utah
How? Every other year would cause you to now have only 3 or 4 H games at your stadium.
This post was edited on 8/16/19 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:25 pm to scrooster
1 problem - SEC WILL NOT put teams from the SAME state in DIFFERENT divisions.
So, Tn./ Vandy, Miss./MSU, & Ala./Aub. are paired.
So, Tn./ Vandy, Miss./MSU, & Ala./Aub. are paired.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:26 pm to southernboisb
quote:
There are 4 (maybe 6) teams who want to KEEP them.
There is NO ROTATION that allows some to stay & others go.
Also, they WON'T be played as non-conf..
Son.
When you start POSTING things in ALL CAPS... most of us think of you as a TOOL.
Slow your roll boy. You may, or may not, have interesting points but we take one look at your post and think you have brain damage.
This post was edited on 8/16/19 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:28 pm to 1801
But this hurts YOU as well as UGA, UF, & Ky. by having ONLY 1 slot to schedule whomever.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:30 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Why yes it WOULD end NOT having DSOR & TSIO as ANNUAL SEC Conf. games.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:32 pm to USCrown
My wild guess is that Tennessee, Auburn, South Carolina, and Arky would like to end the cross division play...because they are getting hammered.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:33 pm to 3rddownonthe8
But how would you schedule that? The 4 in-state ACC rivalries would have to be hosted every other year just to give a MINIMUM of 5 H games. & don't forget, they also have to work ND into their schedules.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 6:36 pm to TigerAndBadger
You're giving LSU the West basically every year with that setup!
Posted on 8/16/19 at 7:00 pm to USCrown
quote:
Interesting statements from Joe Alleva...I guess if nothing has changed and schools will keep voting for their own self interest vs the benefit of the conference :ie playing forced rivalry games, keeping permanent opponent that is perceived as being weaker for easy win, etc...then maybe nothing will change.
I assure you he was pushing his own interests. He’s scared playing Florida every year
Posted on 8/16/19 at 7:17 pm to fibonaccisquared
That is no different than going division-less.
No thank you!
No thank you!
Posted on 8/16/19 at 7:19 pm to deaux
Gee...I wonder why when you pretty much get to the SECCG each year.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 7:23 pm to UKWildcats
"Bingo...four schools are tying up the other ten with their stubborness. UA/UT and AU/UGA can deal with having an occasional off year playing each other. Id like to see Arkansas and Ole Miss more than once every six years. They can get the frick over waiting a year."
& we can keep playing this SEC CONF. GAME YEARLY.
& we can keep playing this SEC CONF. GAME YEARLY.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 7:25 pm to fibonaccisquared
"It makes frick-all sense to end the DSOR or TSIO in order to play Arkansas or Miss St one year earlier in rotation for SEC East teams, or Vandy, UK, Mizzou or whoever for West teams."
A Dawg fan AGAINST DSOR???
A Dawg fan AGAINST DSOR???
Posted on 8/16/19 at 7:27 pm to USCrown
Because those of us with historic rivalries want to keep them as YEARLY CONF. GAMES!
Posted on 8/16/19 at 7:29 pm to USCrown
Honestly, I'd rather move to rotating every year and schedule TSIO as a "non-conference" game. We're the only team in the East that has to play Alabama every year and since right now it counts as a conference game it puts us at a severe disadvantage in division play.
Posted on 8/16/19 at 7:45 pm to USCrown
But there us NO MODEL that works keeping some c-d games & trashing the rest.
Those keeping them will full rotate through the other side in 12 years. Those without full rotate in 7.
withOUT c-d/with c-d
1 full rotation: 7/12
2 full rotations: 14/24
3 full rotations: 21/36
4 full rotations: 28/48
5 full rotations: 35/60
6 full rotations: 42/72
7 full rotations: 49/84
8 full rotations: 56/96
9 full rotations: 63/108
10 full rotations: 70/120
& you think what we have now is bad???
Those keeping them will full rotate through the other side in 12 years. Those without full rotate in 7.
withOUT c-d/with c-d
1 full rotation: 7/12
2 full rotations: 14/24
3 full rotations: 21/36
4 full rotations: 28/48
5 full rotations: 35/60
6 full rotations: 42/72
7 full rotations: 49/84
8 full rotations: 56/96
9 full rotations: 63/108
10 full rotations: 70/120
& you think what we have now is bad???
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News