Started By
Message
If we all Agree that a passing attack opens up rushing lanes...
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:28 pm
QB A has ~500 more yards, 10 more TDs, and 4 less interceptions than QB B, in addition to QB B's schedule being against tougher defenses.
Which QB's play and schedule would allow their freshman RB to be the most successful?
Which QB's play and schedule would allow their freshman RB to be the most successful?
4
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:43 pm to NGATiger
Stahp
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:54 pm to NGATiger
Two trains 150 miles apart are traveling toward each other along the same track. The first train goes 60 miles per hour; the second train rushes along at 90 miles per hour. A fly is hovering just above the nose of the first train. It buzzes from the first train to the second train, turns around immediately, flies back to the first train, and turns around again. It goes on flying back and forth between the two trains until they collide. If the fly's speed is 120 miles per hour, how far will it travel?
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:55 pm to NGATiger
rustled
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:58 pm to NGATiger
How hard is it really for LSU fans......Hutson Mason averaged 25 more total yards a game than Anthony Jennings.
How good is Nick Chubb? Had 202 yds on 30 carries against Arkansas. Bama, LSU & Ole Miss combined for 165 yds on 97 carries against same D.
They have 4 common opponents.Against those 4 teams, Chubb had 83 carries for 672 yards and 6 TDs. Chubb also had 115 yards receiving and a TD. Fournette had 57 carries for 231 yards and 3 TDs. He had zero receptions"
And the talk of the tougher schedule is ridiculous. Perhaps LSU has slight edge in defenses played but very little.However, they have common opponents and it wasn't close.
Chubb is at least as strong of a runner as LF. I don't believe he is and we know Chubb is stronger in the weight room. LG is on record for squatting 600 pounds, benches 315, power-cleans 300. Chubb, on the other hand, Chubb set state records for bench press (365), power clean (390) and squat (700).
Weight room does not mean he runs harder but the film does. LF makes a nice hard run from time-to-time....Chubb does it almost every run.
Chubb has far better vision. Chubb has far better hands. Chubb has far better acceleration. Chubb has far better lateral agility.
Yes, LF can beat him in 100 meters. Fastest LF time I can find is 10.68 and NC 10.69.
LF is going to be a very good back but he is not Nick Chubb. I was on the field for the Notre Dame game. His two biggest plays he didn't even have a glove put on him.
Here is the truth....LF was such a physical freak in high school we never knew what kind of vision and agility. Because we only seen his strengths he was made the GOAT. Chubb dominated but played in a smaller division. People just didn't know if he could do it in the SEC.....he did.
How good is Nick Chubb? Had 202 yds on 30 carries against Arkansas. Bama, LSU & Ole Miss combined for 165 yds on 97 carries against same D.
They have 4 common opponents.Against those 4 teams, Chubb had 83 carries for 672 yards and 6 TDs. Chubb also had 115 yards receiving and a TD. Fournette had 57 carries for 231 yards and 3 TDs. He had zero receptions"
And the talk of the tougher schedule is ridiculous. Perhaps LSU has slight edge in defenses played but very little.However, they have common opponents and it wasn't close.
Chubb is at least as strong of a runner as LF. I don't believe he is and we know Chubb is stronger in the weight room. LG is on record for squatting 600 pounds, benches 315, power-cleans 300. Chubb, on the other hand, Chubb set state records for bench press (365), power clean (390) and squat (700).
Weight room does not mean he runs harder but the film does. LF makes a nice hard run from time-to-time....Chubb does it almost every run.
Chubb has far better vision. Chubb has far better hands. Chubb has far better acceleration. Chubb has far better lateral agility.
Yes, LF can beat him in 100 meters. Fastest LF time I can find is 10.68 and NC 10.69.
LF is going to be a very good back but he is not Nick Chubb. I was on the field for the Notre Dame game. His two biggest plays he didn't even have a glove put on him.
Here is the truth....LF was such a physical freak in high school we never knew what kind of vision and agility. Because we only seen his strengths he was made the GOAT. Chubb dominated but played in a smaller division. People just didn't know if he could do it in the SEC.....he did.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:04 am to TheCheshireHog
Car One is going 50 Miles per hour and gets 30 miles per gallon.
Car 2 is going 100 Miles per hour and gets 18 miles per gallon.
They are traveling 100 Miles. So car 1 gets there in 2 hours. Car 2 gets there in 1 hour.
Which car used less gas and why?
Car 2 is going 100 Miles per hour and gets 18 miles per gallon.
They are traveling 100 Miles. So car 1 gets there in 2 hours. Car 2 gets there in 1 hour.
Which car used less gas and why?
Posted on 1/15/15 at 12:58 am to GatorReb
MPH is irrelevant in this instance. They are both traveling the same distance. The fuel efficiency is in MPG, not miles per time unit.
Car 1 uses 100mi / 30mpg = 3.3... gallons of gas total.
Car 2 uses 100mi / 18mpg = 5.5... gallons of gas total.
Car 1 uses less gas because it is more efficient and they are traveling the same distance.
Car 1 uses 100mi / 30mpg = 3.3... gallons of gas total.
Car 2 uses 100mi / 18mpg = 5.5... gallons of gas total.
Car 1 uses less gas because it is more efficient and they are traveling the same distance.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:04 am to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Two trains 150 miles apart are traveling toward each other along the same track. The first train goes 60 miles per hour; the second train rushes along at 90 miles per hour. A fly is hovering just above the nose of the first train. It buzzes from the first train to the second train, turns around immediately, flies back to the first train, and turns around again. It goes on flying back and forth between the two trains until they collide. If the fly's speed is 120 miles per hour, how far will it travel?
The second train gets better fuel efficiency because it reaches the crash site first.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:27 am to TheCheshireHog
The distance is not a specific number but a limit. Other than that I'm too lazy to learn the calculus or write a computer program to solve it.
It's a limit because each trip between the trains becomes smaller and smaller each time but never actually reaches 0.
It's a limit because each trip between the trains becomes smaller and smaller each time but never actually reaches 0.
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:29 am to DoverDawg
I want to copy this and save it for the next stupid thread
Posted on 1/15/15 at 1:38 am to DoverDawg
This post was edited on 1/15/15 at 1:39 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News