Started By
Message
re: If the Marvin Harrison targetting hit happened Monday (instead of saturday)
Posted on 1/5/23 at 4:08 pm to djsdawg
Posted on 1/5/23 at 4:08 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Asking the world of others
You said it was easy. Now I'm asking for the world.
Which is it?
By the way, I've posted data to support my assertions, and you deflected. If you want to get out of addressing my other points, it's on you to provide some data.
1
Posted on 1/5/23 at 4:43 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
It should be, but asking anything, even a task this easy, is not easy for you to do. It has happened with numerous requests ITT.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 4:45 pm to djsdawg
quote:
It should be, but asking anything, even a task this easy, is not easy for you to do. It has happened with numerous requests ITT.
You are the one who wants to discuss this one specific point.
You provide some data to support your assertion.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 4:55 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
I asked you to provide the list. You refuse to do so.
I asked you to provide examples for targeting. You refused.
I asked you about a play in the Oregon game. You refused.
It’s what you do. Foo nailed the description of you.
I asked you to provide examples for targeting. You refused.
I asked you about a play in the Oregon game. You refused.
It’s what you do. Foo nailed the description of you.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 5:07 pm to djsdawg
quote:
I asked you to provide the list. You refuse to do so.
Nope. I've said repeatedly that if you want to focus on this and ignore the rest, it's up to you to post some data for once.
quote:
I asked you to provide examples for targeting. You refused
bullshite. I've quoted the rule, officials, and provided screenshots.
quote:
I asked you about a play in the Oregon game. You refused.
See above.
quote:
It’s what you do. Foo nailed the description of you.
Foo is a pedant. Always has been. He's just pissy because I don't accept garbage data.
But, at least he offers some data every once in awhile. You haven't bothered.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 6:37 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Bull shite. I've quoted the rule, officials, and provided screenshots.
What play from the Oregon game are you saying was for hitting too hard aka unnecessary roughness?
Posted on 1/5/23 at 7:47 pm to djsdawg
quote:
What play from the Oregon game are you saying was for hitting too hard aka unnecessary roughness?
2nd quarter at 5:15. Looks soft and questionable to me. Still called and still defended as the correct call.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 8:43 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Lets keep this on the front page. I love seeing the frickeyes whine.
Posted on 1/5/23 at 8:56 pm to howieshoodlums
quote:
I love seeing the frickeyes whine.
Man that is so awesome how you wrote frickeyes instead of buckeyes. Your fellow 8th graders will think that’s really cool.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 3:18 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
2nd quarter at 5:15. Looks soft and questionable to me. Still called and still defended as the correct call.
How the frick do you remember a single play like that in a UGA game?
Yea, very soft IMO, but not allowed to body slam players these days, and he tried to do so.
This play might have been the main reason the rule was added in:
LINK
Very dangerous play, could easily break a neck, so makes sense it is not allowed.
Posted on 1/8/23 at 9:43 am to djsdawg
1. Fact on the play the db didn't launch.
2. Fact on the play there was no use of the crown of the
helmet.
3. Fact there was incidental contact of the helmets, but
the targeting rule says there must be forceful
contact to the head and neck area fact there was not.
2. Fact on the play there was no use of the crown of the
helmet.
3. Fact there was incidental contact of the helmets, but
the targeting rule says there must be forceful
contact to the head and neck area fact there was not.
Page 15 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News