Started By
Message
re: If One Mississippi School was Ejected from SEC, Who Would it Be?
Posted on 2/20/14 at 6:25 pm to mizzoukills
Posted on 2/20/14 at 6:25 pm to mizzoukills
ole miss has 3 titles, you have 0
Posted on 2/20/14 at 6:37 pm to mizzoukills
You've only been in the sec for 2 years. Your forefathers will decide who stays or who goes bitch!
#onegameoverfivehundredinconference#domination
#onegameoverfivehundredinconference#domination
Posted on 2/20/14 at 6:50 pm to weedGOKU666
quote:
Our women are physically stronger, though.
How well can they "baaah?"
Posted on 2/20/14 at 6:57 pm to heartbreakTiger
List of schools to go, in order...
Miss St
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt
Arkansas
South Carolina
Missouri
Kentucky
Tennessee
Auburn
LSU
aTM
UGA
Florida
Alabama
Miss St
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt
Arkansas
South Carolina
Missouri
Kentucky
Tennessee
Auburn
LSU
aTM
UGA
Florida
Alabama
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:03 pm to JesusQuintana
Vandy would probably be the last to be kicked out. We need a private school in the conference.
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:04 pm to JesusQuintana
hey zeus, I'd probly wager that charter members might receive a little more tolerance than a new school with boy cheerleaders, just a hunch..
tiz a sad day killz..

tiz a sad day killz..

Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:16 pm to Ole Geauxt
Sorry, I used an incredibly scientific formula to determine value. Fans wouldn't be deciding such things obviously
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:23 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
I used an incredibly scientific formula
eeny meeny mighty meaux?
Fans wouldn't be deciding such things obviously
ewe proved that point
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:44 pm to engie
quote:
Neither MS school will ever be kicked out of the SEC. No one would vote for it. Why? Because you'd be creating an imminent powerhouse at whichever MS team remained. You would create a situation where football championships could very realistically be won in your smallest market. Anyone with foresight could see that logical progression and would never go for it.
As is, the MS schools divide the very good and underrated talent in MS roughly equally -- and it keeps us both good but never great. If you allow all of that talent to consistently go to one school, you have created a situation not much different than LSU enjoys in Louisiana -- with PLENTY of in-state talent to field one legit competitor consistently.
Pretty much this. I think Ole Miss would get to "powerhouse" stature quicker but it wouldn't take State much longer.
Either way, we're founding members so there's a higher chance I get Emma Watson pregnant than us getting kicked out.
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:45 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Miss St
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt
Arkansas
South Carolina
Missouri
Kentucky
Tennessee
Auburn
LSU
aTM
UGA
Florida
Alabama

Y'all would be kicked out before Vanderbilt.
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:47 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Miss St
Ole Miss
Vanderbilt
Arkansas
South Carolina
Missouri
Kentucky
Tennessee
Auburn
LSU
aTM
UGA
Florida
Alabama
Not a single charter member would go. If we did start kicking ones out, we go by the last in, first out principle. Mizzou and TAMU would be first. Then USCe and Arkansas.
Vandy is far too low even under the principle that no charter members will be kicked out, btw -- we may not have the athletic cred, but the SEC needs our private school academic cred. Kentucky sucks at real sports, but we need their basketball tradition. There's simply no way the Big 6 go...Bama, LSU, Auburn, UGA, and Tennessee are the soul of the SEC, and Florida is...well, let's just keep them because they've hung around long enough to finally be good at sports even if they're the least southern of the charter members (with the possible exception of Vandy, and I've already covered them.) That leaves the Mississippi schools, and, well, OM is as southern as they get and Mississippi State is always invited to the same parties as OM is because even Colonel Reb needs a wingman. A hostile, disgruntled, bitter wingman, but a wingman all the same.
Edit: I just noticed your name. Get out of here, you perverted pederast.
This post was edited on 2/20/14 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:49 pm to randomways
quote:
Mizzou and TAMU would be first.
Mizzou would be first almost certainly. Then it would be Arkansas. After that you could debate whether Texas A&M or South Carolina would get kicked out.
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:52 pm to JesusQuintana
no charter member would be gone before aTm, you idiot
Posted on 2/20/14 at 7:52 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Mizzou would be first almost certainly. Then it would be Arkansas. After that you could debate whether Texas A&M or South Carolina would get kicked out.
I can see that. Arkansas is really more of a Midwest type of place anyway. Not a slam on them, just the sense I've gotten when I've been there. USCe always felt like an ACC team to me (and they were, right?) so I guess TAMU would hang on the longest even though -- and Southerners and Texans would both agree -- Texas is not "the South" no matter how hard Yankees try to claim it is.
Posted on 2/20/14 at 8:09 pm to mizzoukills
State adds basically no market OM does not already cover and is a shitty place for visiting fans to visit. Ole Miss adds the Jackson and Memphis market, and is a top 10 national road trip for fans of college football. OM could be very successful with the whole state of MS to itself.
And MSU would likely belong in the AAC. The Big 12 might pick them up but huge maybe.
And MSU would likely belong in the AAC. The Big 12 might pick them up but huge maybe.
Posted on 2/20/14 at 8:10 pm to mizzoukills
unclaimed and non consensus, but nice try
Back to top
