Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:49 pm to cajunbama
Since no one will answer, I will say that a team without its HC is at a severe disadvantage.
Like a huge disadvantage.
So if you ever get the opportunity to play a team without its coach, that is an absolute amazing amount of luck, especially if you barely beat that team and it’s obvious that wouldn’t happen if the HC was actually able to participate.
Like a huge disadvantage.
So if you ever get the opportunity to play a team without its coach, that is an absolute amazing amount of luck, especially if you barely beat that team and it’s obvious that wouldn’t happen if the HC was actually able to participate.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 1:52 pm to cajunbama
He was involved with the prep and the game plan. He just wasnt cleared to be on the sideline.
Normally I'd agree with your premise, but, their coaches did a great job imo. There was no coaching blunders.
Normally I'd agree with your premise, but, their coaches did a great job imo. There was no coaching blunders.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 2:09 pm to Slackaveli
quote:
He just wasnt cleared to be on the sideline.
Which if you are talking about the Arkansas/Kansas game last night, would be a significant loss for the team without its coach.
How would UPig play without that topless runt of y’all’s actually at the game coaching
This post was edited on 3/19/23 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 3/19/23 at 2:12 pm to cajunbama
I'd say about 32-31....
Posted on 3/19/23 at 2:17 pm to tiger81
My wife is cooking some bacon and my house smells really good right now.
Posted on 3/19/23 at 8:13 pm to King
quote:
My wife
Pics?
Posted on 3/19/23 at 8:35 pm to cajunbama
Probably about as luky as facing a team without their best big man (Brizile) and a their most talented player (Smith) coming off an injury. If I had to put points to it I would say Head Coach +2 points, Brizile and a healthy Smith +15. What exactly is your point? Play and coach with what you have.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News