Started By
Message
re: Hard to disagree with Shane Beamer regarding scheduling and risk -vs- reward
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:29 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:29 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
quote:
Shane Beamer to rethink non-conference scheduling after College Football Playoff rankings
He can do a lot of thinking in that big arse midget head of his.
0
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:29 pm to PappyGarcia
Well you’ve been given plenty of sound reason. You keep being pissed and let it ruin your year I don’t care. I’ll enjoy watching Bama win or lose in the playoffs or a bowl game whatever.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:30 pm to labamafan
You can't formulate an argument. I get it. You are in. You shouldn't be, just enjoy it
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:30 pm to PappyGarcia
quote:
Still never complained about Ole Miss being ahead of us. Bama and Miami has no business anywhere near the playoffs.
Well OM is in same scenario as Bama so if that didn’t bother you then you just have a Bama hatred and are just gonna bitch.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:33 pm to labamafan
Once again for the millionth time. Ole Miss is better than you and I would accept them. Bama and Miami have looked like hot garbage down the stretch and have no business being in front of us
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:33 pm to PappyGarcia
quote:
The goalposts move every week depending on the narrative. There was never any transparency with the so called committee for a reason. It's called money.
Someone get this cock a whaaaburger and some french cries.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:35 pm to PappyGarcia
quote:
Ole Miss is better than you and I would accept them
Ah so you’re good with subjective data and not objective data. Like I said I’ve owned you this entire discussion and you’ve not really argued anything intelligently. Have a good night.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:36 pm to labamafan
quote:
I firmly believe if schedule and head to head favored SC they would be in over Bama.
Whatever. I hope yall go winless next year.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:40 pm to labamafan
I will drop the entire argument if you can honestly say you if we beat you by 2 points at home 2 months ago and then looked like hot garbage down the stretch. While you improved exponentially, won 6 straight and beat a playoff bound Auburn team on the road the last week, you would be happy if we stayed ahead of you. That's all I need to hear and I am out.
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:47 pm to PappyGarcia
The lack of knowledge is so incredible. Beamer is referring to next season when yall open with them
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:49 pm to Lonnie Utah
Welcome to the club
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:50 pm to GeauxBurrow312
No Gamecock said that, we are informed unlike the sidewalk goober fans. I believe it was an LSU fan that said that...you know..the team Sankey protected because they were going to make the playoffs.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:53 pm to PappyGarcia
Yall should have won that game, Im not defending the shite reffing this season
And Beamer doesnt qualify as a gamecock? Click the link and read the article
Scheduling Virginia Tech is clearly too much of a risk to your playoff chances
And Beamer doesnt qualify as a gamecock? Click the link and read the article
Scheduling Virginia Tech is clearly too much of a risk to your playoff chances
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:55 pm to GeauxBurrow312
That's next year and he is 100 percent correct. We should strive to be just like half of the playoff teams who played nobody. Why not take the easy path if you get fricked playing it straight? We all can't be Bama and just crap the bed and be in.
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:00 pm to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
quote:
“Disappointing that strength of schedule clearly does not matter for SMU, Indiana and Boise State,” Pollard [Iowa St AD} wrote. . . "Very different standards than the basketball committee.”
Glad to see some coaches and AD shift the focus from arguments about which 3 loss teams and to the amount of teams in the field who made it without beating a single other contending team.
By the way, anyone thinking 3 loss teams would not be in the playoffs has paid no attention to the Top25 every single season forever. There are almost always 3 loss teams with lot of good wins around #9-12 every year.
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:01 pm to PappyGarcia
Got SKULLfrickED on national TV by Oklahoma less than 2 weeks ago.
Didn’t even score a TD.
Yeah, that’s worthy of a playoff spot.
Didn’t even score a TD.
Yeah, that’s worthy of a playoff spot.
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:03 pm to navy
Put them in! It's Bama! They are amazing!
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:06 pm to PappyGarcia
And after a sorry UGA team gets skull fricked against Texas negating their biggest win they should be in too!
8 ots with GA tech lol..who are they, Miami?
8 ots with GA tech lol..who are they, Miami?
This post was edited on 12/4/24 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:08 pm to PappyGarcia
quote:
Not even close. Switch the narrative. South Carolina beats Bama by 2 points 2 months ago at home and then loses twice down the stretch, once embarrassingly to an unranked team Bama killed. That same Bama team makes huge strides and wins 6 in a row over 4 ranked teams in that same time. Beat Auburn on the road who is in the playoffs with a win. In that scenario who is in? Would South Carolina move up 2 spots beating a crap Clemson team and would Bama only move up 1 spot after beating a playoff bound Auburn team on the road?
Posted on 12/4/24 at 11:12 pm to PappyGarcia
AU was headed to the playoffs?
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News