Started By
Message

re: Gurley or Lattimore

Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:12 pm to
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:12 pm to
Dude, give it up. It is not that big of a deal. Lattimore would have been better than many many backs, not just Gurley. Gurley is really good, really good.
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:15 pm to
Yeldon

Changing my vote, screw this thread
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26184 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

During Lattimore's Freshman season he had better stats against Bama, UF and Tenn...I don't need your help making you look silly, thanks.


Sorry but your statement was

quote:

Gurley had great stats against Buffalo, Mizzou, Fla Atlantic, and Georgia Tech...but he wasn't putting up the kind of stats Lattimore was against UGA, FL, or TN.


When I posted his stats they proved that he had better numbers against better competition. He had more yards and touchdowns against better teams. But yes, I'm the moron, not the guy who didn't bother to actually look up the statistics.
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

But yes, I'm the moron


Don't be hard on yourself. It takes a clever man to realize that the stats I posted in my original post were statistics I looked up.
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26184 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:05 pm to
Yea the stats you looked up for one guy to prove a dumb comparison. You didn't bother to post the stats of the claim you made against Gurley, which would have proved you wrong.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
40983 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:30 pm to
Good gosh please tell me people are not saying Gurley had a better freshman season than Lattimore.

Total fricking stupidity on display.
Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
79683 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 10:35 pm to
Gurley, incredible just how huge the guy is and yet runs so well.
Posted by Loathor
Columbia, SC
Member since Jun 2012
2369 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

I'm sorry but do some fricking research.
Gurley
vs Bama: 122 yards 2 TD's
vs Tenn: 130 yards 3 TD's
vs UF: 118 yards 1 TD
vs Vandy 130 yards 2 TD's

You clearly showed your bias in this discussion because you assumed stats and it made you look like a moron.

ETA: BOOM BITCH


I'm not done reading through the thread, so this might have been addressed... but I couldn't let this stand...

vs Georgia: 182 yards 2 TD's
vs Bama: 93 yards 2 Td's (and another recieving TD)
vs Tenn: 184 yards 1 TD
vs UF: 212 yards 3 TDs
vs Kentucky: 79 rushing yards 133 receiving yards and 3 total TDs

Yeah... those stats are pretty biased...
Posted by RattletrapDawg
Valdosta
Member since Sep 2012
2058 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:05 pm to
Gurley.......
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

Yeah... those stats are pretty biased...


Why does everyone assume these stats are comparable. 2 completely different seasons. The purpose of posting those stats was to illustrate that CIYE was patently wrong when insinuating that Gurley managed to rack up all his stats against the sisters of the poor. If you'd like to compare the 2 backs you can look at their end of year stats IF that's even remotely viable.

Again, my opinion is that with injuries out of the equation, there is a slight edge to the physicality that Lattimore brings to the table. HOWEVER, his running style and frame (along with the highly irresponsible usage that your program asked him to take on given what we know now) make him significantly more risky. Gurley has more rushing yards, a higher YPC and 1 less touchdown with 50 fewer carries. There is not a clear winner but I'll just say I'm happy that we have him and that I hope Lattimore is able to rehab and have success at the NFL level. Class act!
Posted by stho381
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4634 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:10 pm to
Lattimore
Posted by Loathor
Columbia, SC
Member since Jun 2012
2369 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:23 pm to
Throwing out just the running stats and saying that this proves that Gurley is the better back is ridiculous. Lattimore had 1600 total yards on the season and 19 total TDs. (Hell, he had more receiving yards in one game against Kentucky than Gurley had all season.) Lattimore is also an outstanding blocking back. He was the total package, which is what makes him the better option, injuries being off the table.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
40983 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

vs Georgia: 182 yards 2 TD's
vs Bama: 93 yards 2 Td's (and another recieving TD)
vs Tenn: 184 yards 1 TD
vs UF: 212 yards 3 TDs
vs Kentucky: 79 rushing yards 133 receiving yards and 3 total TDs


Correct, and Lattie had those numbers against Kentucky in less than two quarters.
Posted by RattletrapDawg
Valdosta
Member since Sep 2012
2058 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:30 pm to
I would take either one of them. They are both game changers.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84299 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

Lache Seastrunk

Posted by ConwayGamecock
South Carolina
Member since Jan 2012
9121 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:36 pm to
IMO this is a pointless and stupid argument....it's the same as the one comparing Alshon Jeffery to A.J. Green. UGA fans are going to stick by their guy, and USC fans will stick by theirs. No side is going to win the other over.

So why are we even bothering with this?
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84299 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

Gurley or Lattimore


quote:

I would take either one of them. They are both game changers.



quote:

Georgia Fan


Dammit, Mayans.
Posted by fibonaccisquared
The mystical waters of the Hooch
Member since Dec 2011
16898 posts
Posted on 12/12/12 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

He was the total package, which is what makes him the better option, injuries being off the table.

Are you not capable of reading? Do they not teach that at your school?

quote:

Again, my opinion is that with injuries out of the equation, there is a slight edge to the physicality that Lattimore brings to the table. HOWEVER, his running style and frame (along with the highly irresponsible usage that your program asked him to take on given what we know now) make him significantly more risky.

quote:

FWIW, if I could ABSOLUTELY throw away the propensity for injury, I would lean towards Lattimore by a small margin.


It is a qualified lean, but nonetheless, I think Lattimore would be the better option IF injuries are off the table. Injuries are, however, a significant part of the game of football.

Your argument that he has more receiving yards is valid, though I don't think the margin would be as high if Gurley didn't share carries and touches with KM. Not our fault that we have another back who is also capable of doing damage. When you don't split the carries, you end up with a RB that takes too many hits and gets injured right? The days of the solo RB are pretty much gone. Most NFL teams aren't doing it. The top teams in college aren't doing it anymore. There are only a few RBs who can carry the load by themselves and not get injured... Look at Adrian Peterson even...

It is irresponsible in my opinion to try and have one back shoulder the load in today's game of football.
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26184 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:00 am to
quote:

IMO this is a pointless and stupid argument....it's the same as the one comparing Alshon Jeffery to A.J. Green. UGA fans are going to stick by their guy, and USC fans will stick by theirs. No side is going to win the other over.


Lolololololololol
Posted by americanrealism
Smoking an 8th in the multiverse
Member since Nov 2012
1515 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:14 am to
quote:

Total fricking homerism on display.

FIFY. I wish we could take a poll on this but only ask non-UGA or SC fans.

Personally I'd take a healthy Lattimore but it's really splitting hairs at this point. Two great backs. Also alert the hyperbole police to whoever said "Since 2010 Latt is the standard by which all SEC backs are judged".
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter