Started By
Message
re: Give the SEC West QBs a grade on a scale of 1-100
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:34 am to TeLeFaWx
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:34 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I have also factored in running 30 straight times. If you have an average QB you pass it to prevent them from stacking the box.
what was our avg yardage during those 30 runs? that shouldn't reflect negatively on the qb, it's just shows a kickass running game. he can pass and does when necessary.
0
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:51 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Egg Bowl fumble.
One play? Our offensive line or shitty RB play that game had nothing to do with it. You're right, that one play single-handedly lost it for us.
Even if so, there was nothing Bo could have done. That's a freakishly lucky play.
But troll(terribly) on.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:52 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Did all those passes to Boise defenders count as completions?
No, but if they did, he'd still have the highest completion in the nation.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:53 am to asphinctersayswhat
quote:
No need to get upset
Not one frick given...I just thought maybe you would have a statistic or something to back up your opinion. I guess I was mistaken.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:56 am to REBEL5 AC
quote:
You're right, that one play single-handedly lost it for us.
If he didn't fumble you would have won the game so yeah.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:57 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
You totally ignored the scale system. Holy shite. 50 is average. 80 is All-American.
your scales sucks; made up my own
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:58 am to silenth69
quote:
Not one frick given...I just thought maybe you would have a statistic or something to back up your opinion. I guess I was mistaken.
511 yards passing and 4 TDs against a ranked team maybe? Bo's toughest opponent was unranked Boise and he looked terrible? What are their respective QBRs against ranked teams?
This post was edited on 9/23/14 at 11:59 am
Posted on 9/23/14 at 11:59 am to Masterag
quote:
your scales sucks
Tread lightly, young buck.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:01 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Tread lightly, young buck.
lol... chill out brah, i was joking. didn't see your scale before i posted.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:07 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
511 yards passing and 4 TDs against a ranked team
Remind me... What team did he play that is currently ranked?? Before you say West Virginia, I believe Boise got more votes in the coaches poll this week than WV did...
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:07 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
20 or lower would be a starter at LSU.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:07 pm to silenth69
quote:
Remind me... What team did he play that is currently ranked?? Before you say West Virginia, I believe Boise got more votes in the coaches poll this week than WV did...
Lol
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:08 pm to silenth69
quote:
Remind me... What team did he play that is currently ranked?? Before you say West Virginia, I believe Boise got more votes in the coaches poll this week than WV did...
South Carolina. You asked why Hill was clearly better than the other four. Kenny Hill is the starter for Texas A&M.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:10 pm to TeLeFaWx
Horrible grading
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:20 pm to Bham4Tide
quote:
Horrible grading
What would you change?
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:22 pm to Bham4Tide
Brandon Allen should be at 65 imo, bases on this season. He's been pretty efficient when we need him to pass and his only interception came against Auburn when he was hit mid-throw.
He has overthrown a couple of open receivers and has had a few other accuracy problems, but he has also had receivers drop good passes. For the most part, he has passed well.
If not for some of those uncatchable passes to open receivers, I would have graded him at 70 or 75.
But, we won't really know where he stands until we play some more SEC teams that can slow our run game and force us to pass. Then we'll see what he can really do.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:24 pm to Hog on the Hill
75 is close to All-American status. He's been the 6th best QB in the division.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 1:23 pm to TeLeFaWx
You can't have a legit rating system based on subjective opinions, it has to be objective. Have you ever seen an NFL QB's rating based on what it might be if he played for another team?
Or have you ever seen an NFL QB's number raised or lowered by who his WR's or RB's were?
Sorry pal, your ratings are schite.
Or have you ever seen an NFL QB's number raised or lowered by who his WR's or RB's were?
Sorry pal, your ratings are schite.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 1:36 pm to kudzoo
quote:
Or have you ever seen an NFL QB's number raised or lowered by who his WR's or RB's were?
Yeah when Randy Moss went to the Patriots, Tom Brady threw for more TDs than the year before.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 1:47 pm to TeLeFaWx
A receiver is only half of the equation, the QB first has to deliver the ball to him, often while under considerable duress.
Guess that little factoid never occurred to you?
Guess that little factoid never occurred to you?
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News