Started By
Message
re: Georgia 10 Oklahoma State 24* Final
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:19 pm to dudeilovebeer
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:19 pm to dudeilovebeer
quote:
I don't know if I would say they have zero tradition. Barry Sanders did win a Heisman out of OSU.
So did George Rogers....you want to make a case for the great winning tradition of South Carolina?
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:20 pm to Sandperson
Haven't read teh whole thread, sorry if germans, but Cox did not impress me.
Still only the first game, and a tough way to start the season for any SEC team. Okie State looks like a pretty good team.
Still only the first game, and a tough way to start the season for any SEC team. Okie State looks like a pretty good team.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm ignorant?
Yes, you are.
quote:
No player shall initiate contact and target a defenseless opponent above the shoulders. When in question, it is a foul.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:28 pm to Tiger Prowl
quote:
UGA has some nice WRs that are not getting much action. QB Cox is less than impressive (may be the flu).
You know, I completely forgot about him being sick.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:29 pm to arrakis
quote:
No player shall initiate contact and target a defenseless opponent above the shoulders. When in question, it is a foul.
1. not defenseless WR. he was bobbling the ball
2. the hit was not above the shoulders. it was in teh chest/shoulders area
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:29 pm to Sandperson
Dix Cox play in this game?
Heard he had the flue
thanks
Heard he had the flue
thanks
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:30 pm to kfizzle85
quote:
Dude you absolutely fail at reason.
Probably appears that way to those who've never read a rule book. Sorry, that's their problem.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:31 pm to arrakis
i've seen the rule book
you haven't seen the play
you haven't seen the play
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
1. not defenseless WR. he was bobbling the ball
2. the hit was not above the shoulders. it was in teh chest/shoulders area
You are as blind as you are stupid.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:31 pm to arrakis
quote:
You are as blind as you are stupid
ok it must be fun to state certainties without any sort of reasoning behind them
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:34 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
Dix Cox play in this game?
Heard he had the flue
thanks
Unless you're just being sarcastic he played, but not well. Dunno if the flu was affecting him, but he looked like he had a noodle for an arm.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
ok it must be fun to state certainties without any sort of reasoning behind them
Stating the obvious. Three officials, with FAR more knowledge than you and from three different viewpoints, flagged it.
You are simply too stupid to realize you're wrong. But, I've come to expect that from you.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:41 pm to arrakis
quote:
Probably appears that way to those who've never read a rule book. Sorry, that's their problem.
Naw, it appears that way when you said
quote:
Whether I support it or not is irrelevant. The rules and philosophy for administering the rules are relevant.
which is completely backwards to any non-referee.
Listen, we know you are a ref, and you're just trying to defend your fellow refs. They have to make the call as the rules states, everyone understands that. Most people (not SFP) think that it is a shitty rule and therefore a shitty call. Your position is that it doesn't matter that it is a shitty rule, and therefore the call is irrelevant, and that is completely a unreasonable and untenable position to assume. You're also being an a-hole about it.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:43 pm to arrakis
quote:
Three officials, with FAR more knowledge than you and from three different viewpoints, flagged it.
i saw the replay
i'm discussing the replay and it's fit (or lack of fit) within the rulebook
you, are not
quote:
You are simply too stupid to realize you're wrong.
161 IQ and summa cum laude college grad, but you're vastly superior stating you're right without any backing
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:45 pm to kfizzle85
oh he's a ref?
arakis, do you call holding on every play? if you don't you're a fricking hypocrite
arakis, do you call holding on every play? if you don't you're a fricking hypocrite
Posted on 9/5/09 at 6:57 pm to kfizzle85
quote:
Your position is that it doesn't matter that it is a shitty rule, and therefore the call is irrelevant, and that is completely a unreasonable and untenable position to assume.
Personally, I don't think the rule is "shitty". If you don't like the rule, contact Bellotti and Redding.
quote:
You're also being an a-hole about it.
Probably so. The play in question was SO obvious SloFlo's statements deserved ridicule.
quote:
you're just trying to defend your fellow refs
I'm not defending anyone. If I see a blown call, I'll be the first to say so. If you read the thread, you'll notice I was critical of the white hat. He was sloppy and it reflects on the entire crew.
Posted on 9/5/09 at 7:00 pm to arrakis
quote:
The play in question was SO obvious
you have still yet to say how it was obvious, let alone "SO" obvious
Posted on 9/5/09 at 7:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
161 IQ and summa cum laude college grad,
...with a 3 year old's football IQ.
Any explanation of the obvious will be so far above your ability to comprehend, it's a complete waste of time.
This post was edited on 9/5/09 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 9/5/09 at 7:20 pm to Sandperson
freakin joke they won. Our offense played like crap. U can't win in the SEC when u can only score 10 points gainst one of the worst defenses in the NCAA
Popular
Back to top


4





