Started By
Message
re: Gary Pinkel submits late hit on Franklin for review
Posted on 10/16/13 at 3:29 pm to labamafan
Posted on 10/16/13 at 3:29 pm to labamafan
quote:
Without seeing a receiver or the line of scrimmage how was that not intentional grounding?
1. He was outside the tackle box
2. The ball landed beyond the LOS extended
That's why it's not intentional grounding
Posted on 10/16/13 at 5:27 pm to Sandwich
quote:
Franklin a baby-back bitch...what is that? like two years in a row that pussy cant take a hit.
Yeah. It's a shame you got pwned between the hedges. And should have been pwned the week before.
I would say Pinkel's March was successful...
Posted on 10/16/13 at 5:43 pm to gatorhata9
quote:
No one was targeted and there was no contact with the crown of the helmet. 0/2. Great debating you.
I am not even worrying about what is past......but you need to watch that clip again. 59 grabs QB 's arms and jams his head first into middle of Frank's back.....
This post was edited on 10/16/13 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 10/16/13 at 5:54 pm to Bogie00
You could look at it like that or you could look at it like a guy wrapping up. What it boils down to is nothing was blatant, nothing was dirty, there was no targeting and thus no flag. Pinkel is upset his QB is hurt so he's going to whine about it. The league will do nothing and we'll move on. End of story.
Posted on 10/16/13 at 5:56 pm to Bogie00
nm
This post was edited on 10/16/13 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 10/16/13 at 5:57 pm to gatorhata9
I have no love for the dawgs and very little hate so...
When I saw the play live, I thought it was a tad late and I mean a tad. But had no problem with the no call. Slow motion makes it look much worse than it was.
If Pinkel wanted to submit it to the league as pre-emptive strike then it won't work.
When I saw the play live, I thought it was a tad late and I mean a tad. But had no problem with the no call. Slow motion makes it look much worse than it was.
If Pinkel wanted to submit it to the league as pre-emptive strike then it won't work.
Posted on 10/16/13 at 5:57 pm to gatorhata9
I have no love for the dawgs and very little hate so...
When I saw the play live, I thought it was a tad late and I mean a tad. But had no problem with the no call. Slow motion makes it look much worse than it was.
If Pinkel wanted to submit it to the league as pre-emptive strike then it won't work.
When I saw the play live, I thought it was a tad late and I mean a tad. But had no problem with the no call. Slow motion makes it look much worse than it was.
If Pinkel wanted to submit it to the league as pre-emptive strike then it won't work.
Posted on 10/16/13 at 6:15 pm to MizzouSEC2012
So anyhow, why hasnt the OP posted a gif of Mizzouz guy puttn a late hit on Murray when he threw the first int? Even the announcers called it late? How about Pinky, did he submit that as well?
Posted on 10/16/13 at 6:36 pm to adawgj
I think pinkel is going about this all wrong... judging by what we learned in last weeks game, you have a problem with the refs, you throw a friendly chest bump their way.
Anybody have that gif?
Anybody have that gif?
Posted on 10/16/13 at 8:11 pm to MizzouSEC2012
It was a heckuva football hit worthy of Nick Fairley himself!
Hey Dawgs, Nick told me to tell y'all "Go Dawgs! Woofwoofwoofwoofwoof!"
Hey Dawgs, Nick told me to tell y'all "Go Dawgs! Woofwoofwoofwoofwoof!"
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:11 pm to MizzouSEC2012
It's definitely Fairley-esque. I'm certainly not unbiased though.
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:19 pm to MizzouSEC2012
Missouri was on TV? There's video footage of their football team?
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:20 pm to Porker Face
You should hope and pray that arkansas isn't on tv the rest of this year.. save the embarrassment.
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:23 pm to Sleeping Tiger
But we probably will be
Because a rebuilding Arkansas draws in the TVs better than Missouri*
* INCLUDES LEGENDARY ST. LOUIS, IL-MO AND KANSAS CITY, KS-MO METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL VIEWING AREAS
Because a rebuilding Arkansas draws in the TVs better than Missouri*
* INCLUDES LEGENDARY ST. LOUIS, IL-MO AND KANSAS CITY, KS-MO METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL VIEWING AREAS
This post was edited on 10/16/13 at 9:24 pm
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:31 pm to Porker Face
Porker you're not posting with your Mizzou alters. Strange how you pop up in every Missouri or Mizzou thread. Then when you don't show up, there's these "new" Mizzou fans that just joined in Sept and Oct posting stupid shite. Dude you are a joke. Mizzou is constantly on your mind.
I bet you're mad Mizzou is 6-0 and ranked huh. Eats your arse huh.
I bet you're mad Mizzou is 6-0 and ranked huh. Eats your arse huh.
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:31 pm to MizzouSEC2012
Nothing like good old UGA home cooking!
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:35 pm to bayou2003
quote:
Porker you're not posting with your Mizzou alters
I have none
quote:
Strange how you pop up in every Missouri or Mizzou thread. Then when you don't show up, there's these "new" Mizzou fans that just joined in Sept and Oct posting stupid shite
quote:
Mizzou is constantly on your mind
Sounds like my posting habits are constantly on your mind. How pathetic
quote:
I bet you're mad Mizzou is 6-0
No more than I am about Texas Tech, Northern Illinois or Fresno State
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:41 pm to Porker Face
quote:
Mizzou is constantly on your mind
Sounds like my posting habits are constantly on your mind. How pathetic
You even have a Mizzou fans quote in your signature text. How pathetic. I bet you punch the wall every time Mizzou wins. I bet you are praying for Florida to stomp Mizzou so you can pop in the thread to talk shite and start topics bashing Mizzou.
This post was edited on 10/16/13 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 10/16/13 at 9:44 pm to bayou2003
quote:
You even have a Mizzou fans quote in your signature text
And?
quote:
I bet you are praying for Florida to stomp Mizzou so you can pop in the thread to talk shite and start topics bashing Mizzou
I think everyone here knows, it doesn't matter if Missouri wins or loses for me to show up
Back to top


0





