Started By
Message
re: Fournette>Chubb
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:07 pm to Shakita Bonita
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:07 pm to Shakita Bonita
quote:
It is comical. The rest of the world is laughing at you retards for even trying to claim that Fournette is just 'slightly' better than Chubb.
Like someone literally said Fournette 'had a slight advantage' before Chubb's injury. Y'all need to take off the red and black shades
Are the LSU avi and LSU related sig not enough for you to infer who I'm a fan of?
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:08 pm to RB10
quote:
guy comes across as a complete homer in this conversation.
You talking about the guy who said 0.40 YPC is a lot more, but 3.44 YPC is not a lot less? That was the biggest homer claim in this whole conversation.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:08 pm to RB10
quote:
Georgia icon
quote:
literally says 'Georgia fan'
quote:
sig is mocking LSU
Forgive me.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:09 pm to djsdawg
quote:
You talking about the guy who said 0.40 YPC is a lot more, but 3.44 YPC is not a lot less? That was the biggest homer claim in this whole conversation.
You mean me claiming that going from 1022 and 12 TDs to 900 yards and 10 TDs isn't a big drop off is being a homer?
Right....
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:10 pm to Shakita Bonita
All you had to say was "no, I'm not good with context clues".

Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:11 pm to Shakita Bonita
Chubb will be a better NFL back in my opinion. Fournette is a college celebrity, and will end up like Trent Richardson when it's all said and done.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:13 pm to RB10
I don't think you know what context clues are. 
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:14 pm to Shakita Bonita
quote:
I don't think you know what context clues are.
Coming from you, that probably means I'm an expert with them.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:15 pm to RB10
quote:
And as I said, is delusional and uninformed.
How is it delusional and uninformed? Once again, the burden is on you to PROVE such accusations. This is where you need some STATS and safe assumptions to make your point.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:16 pm to Shakita Bonita
quote:
LSU fan
quote:
Avatar Image of Auburn
quote:
Texas sig
Aggie fan?
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:21 pm to RB10
quote:
You mean me claiming that going from 1022 and 12 TDs to 900 yards and 10 TDs isn't a big drop off is being a homer?
What you are referring to is 8.58 vs 8.18 YPC. You said a difference of 0.40 YPC WAS a big drop off in YPC.
What I am referring to is 8.58 vs 5.14. You said a difference of 3.44 YPC was NOT a big drop off in YPC.
Fact: A difference of 3.44 YPC is 8x MORE of a drop off than a difference of 0.40 YPC.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:23 pm to djsdawg
quote:
How is it delusional and uninformed? Once again, the burden is on you to PROVE such accusations. This is where you need some STATS and safe assumptions to make your point.
You mean something like this:
None of the remaining teams on UGA's schedule gave up more tha 5.0 YPC on the season. The average of the remaining teams was 4.07 YPC against. Yet, it's safe to assume Chubb would easily average 5.5 YPC against them?
Delusional.....
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:23 pm to djsdawg
quote:
You said a difference of 0.40 YPC WAS a big drop off in YPC.
Never once said this. You kept saying it, but I didn't.
I said Fournette outperformed Chubb by a considerable margin in the first 5 games of 2015.
119 for 1022 and 12 TDs
91 for 747 and 7 TDs.
In fact, YPC is the only thing that's even close.
I also said that Fournette's performance in the 2nd half of the season wasn't a "huge" dropoff, like you claimed. The only reason you keep clinging to the YPC is because it's the only stat that doesn't make that statement look completely ridiculous.
This post was edited on 3/8/16 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:48 pm to RB10
quote:
quote:
How is it delusional and uninformed? Once again, the burden is on you to PROVE such accusations. This is where you need some STATS and safe assumptions to make your point.
You mean something like this:
None of the remaining teams on UGA's schedule gave up more tha 5.0 YPC on the season. The average of the remaining teams was 4.07 YPC against. Yet, it's safe to assume Chubb would easily average 5.5 YPC against them?
Delusional.....
It's a nice try but it's incredibly flawed logic.
If what you said was flawless, then chubb would have never had a career average of 7.4 to begin with.
Fact is, Chubb has a history of consistently putting up much higher ypc than his opponents had allowed.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 3:55 pm to djsdawg
quote:
It's a nice try but it's incredibly flawed logic.
No more flawed than yours of, "He's averaged over 5.5 so far so it's a given he does it going out".
That's a fact.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 4:04 pm to RB10
quote:
Never once said this. You kept saying it, but I didn't.
You used the word "markedly" to be exact, but it's obvious you had no clue what it meant. It's defined as "significant", and "greatly" is a synonym for it.
Posted on 3/8/16 at 4:14 pm to djsdawg
quote:
used the word "markedly" to be exact, but it's obvious you had no clue what it meant. It's defined as "significant", and "greatly" is a synonym for it.
You do know there are more stats than just YPC, right? He was "markedly" better in every category other than YPC, which he was only marginally better. Check my post with their stats listed.
As I said in that eRlier post, you're clinging to YPC because it's the only star that's even close to being even.
I'm going home. Enjoy the rest of your day. I'm sure you'll see some dragons and leprechauns on the way home in that little world you live in.
This post was edited on 3/8/16 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 3/8/16 at 4:49 pm to RB10
quote:
you're clinging to YPC because it's the only star that's even close to being even.
Sorry, but That's not why. All the other stats are skewed towards the guy who had the most carries, which is their flaw. Ypc removes that variable, which makes it the best stat available.
Popular
Back to top



1



