re: Former football pro, dead at 56. Died in his sleep.

quote:

---

Nope, most are deleted, moved or anchored because they don’t belong here and sane people are sick of this type of crap.

Either get over it or put it where people who care post this tripe, there are plenty of places, that’s not censorship, that’s just common sense of which you are sorely lacking….

---

I don't care if it gets moved or not. I didn't make the thread, all I did was comment on it. It's private property, they can do whatever the hell they want, it's none of my concern and it's not really censorship for them to do so.

I'm only talking about why you want it removed, and that it's what the left does with everything. You're tired of hearing about it because you don't like being told you were wrong, nor does the left want to accept responsibility for the shite they did.

If people weren't interested in the topic, nobody would be posting on it. Do you go into every single thread you don't like and post this shite? frick no. You only post it now because you don't want to see it, or allow other people to talk about it.

And I don't go to political places because I don't want to talk to bots. I like to talk to real people.

quote:

---

It really just highlights the general way leftists in this country operate. Never actually able to debate the real points, always reduced to nothing more than creating their own strawmans and beating them down.

---

Yeah... the second half of your response was literally a strawman and emotional grandstanding that went off on an impressive tangent. I don't know how it got to you fighting against "facism", and, by default, me somehow promoting it but that was quite weird. Or maybe you don't think I was actually for facism but you got to "grandstanding" and it got away from you...

Anyways, I made some simple points about basic statistics and the fact DNA/RNA work has been considered a vaccine for quite some time. That is it, fin, no more. Building up a bunch of little points/issues you imply I was defending is kinda what a "strawman" is.

To one of the only two narrow points I was making, this fantasy that mRNA technology was never considered a "vaccine" is factually incorrect. You can literally read a paper written back in 2002 about prostate tumor vaccines. Doubt you are interested but here ya go LINK I mean that was 20 years ago.

I suggest staying a little more on topic in the future. Respond to one point and put a little bow on it. When you go off with some "emotional grandstanding" (second half of your comment) it is hard to take you seriously. And "That's a fact" when, per the source I provided, it is literally not a fact, it is not the best look. It has been fun but it looks like you are pretty emotional about this and any further discussion will be pointless. It seems to bring out some grievance related to things I was not even talking about. Later.