Started By
Message
re: Fisher has never reached double digit wins at 8&4feit?
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:31 pm to Farmer1906
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:31 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
We went 8-1 vs the SEC. Take away 1 of those games (non Bama loss) and you have 7-1 in a normal SEC schedule. Add in 3 cupcakes plus Colorado. That's 11-1. We miss the playoffs, goto the Orange Bowl, beat UNC and finished 12-1.
Assuming you beat Ole Miss, which would've been a tall task considering they were a terrible matchup for your 2020 team.
3
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:38 pm to SidewalkTiger
Terrible matchup? 
A&M's o-line and running game coupled with its defense would have kept Ole Miss's offense off the field long enough to dominate the TOP.
A&M's o-line and running game coupled with its defense would have kept Ole Miss's offense off the field long enough to dominate the TOP.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:41 pm to SidewalkTiger
I think it's safe to assume A&M (and UF as well) get to at least 10 wins in a normal 2020 season. We wouldn't have played A&M and still could've made the CFP even after the cleat yeet.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:45 pm to cramps
quote:
Terrible matchup?
A&M's o-line and running game coupled with its defense would have kept Ole Miss's offense off the field long enough to dominate the TOP.
You didn't even dominate TOP against two really bad defenses and meh offenses in Vanderbilt and LSU.
Also averaged 15 points per game in those matchups against two historically bad defenses.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:46 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
You didn't even dominate TOP against two really bad defenses and meh offenses in Vanderbilt and LSU.
Also averaged 15 points per game in those matchups against two historically bad defenses.
LSU scored 7 points against A&M in 2020. They scored 53 on Ole Miss.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:47 pm to MetroAtlantaGatorFan
quote:
I think it's safe to assume A&M (and UF as well) get to at least 10 wins in a normal 2020 season. We wouldn't have played A&M and still could've made the CFP even after the cleat yeet.
I think you both get to double digit wins but it would've been tough to make the playoff with 2 losses in a normal season.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:48 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
I think you both get to double digit wins but it would've been tough to make the playoff with 2 losses in a normal season.
Well that's assuming we beat Bama in the SEC title game to be 12-1.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:48 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
I think you both get to double digit wins but it would've been tough to make the playoff with 2 losses in a normal season.
In a normal season, Trevor Lawrence isn't sidelined due to the sniffles and Notre Dame loses to them twice.
This post was edited on 3/31/22 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:54 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
LSU scored 7 points against A&M in 2020. They scored 53 on Ole Miss.
Actually 46. One of LSU's touchdowns was a pick six.
By that same token, Ole Miss scored 48 on LSU while Texas A&M only scored 13.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 5:55 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
In a normal season, Trevor Lawrence isn't sidelined due to the sniffles and Notre Dame loses to them twice.
Clemson didn't lose that game due to Trevor being sidelined.
Clemson's backup actually played better in the first game than Trevor did in the rematch.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:01 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Texas A&M only scored 13.
It was also A&M's first game in weeks in bad weather and Mond's worst performance. He could have had a bad game against Ole Miss as well, but they weren't going to stack the box and stop the running game like LSU did either.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:03 pm to cramps
quote:
It was also A&M's first game in weeks in bad weather and Mond's worst performance. He could have had a bad game against Ole Miss as well, but they weren't going to stack the box and stop the running game like LSU did either.
Why not?
ETA I would argue that LSU actually didn't stop the run against you very well. Spiller averaged nearly 5 YPC vs LSU and Mond was around 4.
This post was edited on 3/31/22 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:12 pm to SidewalkTiger
Ole Miss was barely a top 100 defense that year at #97, LSU was #65, and A&M was #14.
The LSU game wasn't a good indicator of A&M's season; it was an ugly win in cold and shitty weather that affected Mond's throwing. Vandy was the week before Bama so they couldn't show much.
The LSU game wasn't a good indicator of A&M's season; it was an ugly win in cold and shitty weather that affected Mond's throwing. Vandy was the week before Bama so they couldn't show much.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:13 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Why not?
ETA I would argue that LSU actually didn't stop the run against you very well. Spiller averaged nearly 5 YPC vs LSU and Mond was around 4
Okay but Mond couldn't throw the ball and move the chains on third down which was the difference maker for A&M all season long.
This post was edited on 3/31/22 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:18 pm to Clay Davis
quote:
isher has never reached double digit wins at 8&4feit? by Clay Davis
Only because the COVID year was shortened to 10 games. That would've been a 12-1 year.
could’ve, should’ve, would’ve, DIDN’T
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:26 pm to hookem2522
I keep laughing at this one.
9-1 = .90
10-3 = .77
Thus going 9-1 is actually better than going 10-3.
But for reasons of an agenda on the rant, fans of certain schools want to act liking having a 10 win season is some great feat. When actually it’s easier to do if you play 13 games.
What’s even more impressive with our 9-1 is we did it with a SEC only schedule. No gimmies 3-4 games that’s comes with some of the SEC schools that went 10-3. Get rid of those 4 gimmies out of conference games and their SEC schedule was 6-3. Awesome!!
Rant is going to rant!
9-1 = .90
10-3 = .77
Thus going 9-1 is actually better than going 10-3.
But for reasons of an agenda on the rant, fans of certain schools want to act liking having a 10 win season is some great feat. When actually it’s easier to do if you play 13 games.
What’s even more impressive with our 9-1 is we did it with a SEC only schedule. No gimmies 3-4 games that’s comes with some of the SEC schools that went 10-3. Get rid of those 4 gimmies out of conference games and their SEC schedule was 6-3. Awesome!!
Rant is going to rant!
This post was edited on 3/31/22 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:31 pm to Texas Gentleman
quote:
We finished 9-1 in the Covid year and would’ve easily hit double digits had it been a normal season. Don’t let circumstance get in the way of a good narrative though.
No you wouldn’t have! without the extra rest aggy timed using covid as another excuse aggy wouldn’t have won as many games.
poor aggies
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:37 pm to Whentheleveebreaks
quote:
I keep laughing at this one.
9-1 = .90
10-3 = .77
Thus going 9-1 is actually better than going 10-3.
and i keep laughing at you as i never said that.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:44 pm to hookem2522
Great for you Einstein.
I’m referring to the entire thread. I don’t respond to your specific posts bc they typically are so bad they do not warrant response. Their badness stands on its own merit.
In case you were wondering. 5-7 = .42. Not even half of the winning % going 9-1.
How about you win some more games in the next year or two before coming to the big boy table.
I’m referring to the entire thread. I don’t respond to your specific posts bc they typically are so bad they do not warrant response. Their badness stands on its own merit.
In case you were wondering. 5-7 = .42. Not even half of the winning % going 9-1.
How about you win some more games in the next year or two before coming to the big boy table.
Posted on 3/31/22 at 6:51 pm to Whentheleveebreaks
well now that you explained all that …….. YOU were still wrong.
and as much as you say you don’t respond to my post………. YOU DID.
poor aggie
and as much as you say you don’t respond to my post………. YOU DID.
poor aggie
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News