Started By
Message
re: Evidence shows Kyren Lacy did not cause crash.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:15 pm to MillerLiteTime
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:15 pm to MillerLiteTime
I never wished for Lacy’s life to be ruined because of this mistake and hated to hear he took his life eventually, but acting like he has no responsibility here is completely false.
Lacy should have fought this in court. I don’t think he would be totally cleared but there’s enough mitigating evidence that he probably still has a career ahead of him.
Lacy should have fought this in court. I don’t think he would be totally cleared but there’s enough mitigating evidence that he probably still has a career ahead of him.
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 8:05 pm
2
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:16 pm to Jebadeb
It is awful, but that's why you have to let the justice system play itself out.
He would've been completely exonerated and his dreams of playing in the NFL would be attainable.
He would've been completely exonerated and his dreams of playing in the NFL would be attainable.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:19 pm to jangalang
quote:
Why the evidence coming out what a year later?
Is this a serious question?
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:26 pm to TideSaint
quote:
He would've been completely exonerated and his dreams of playing in the NFL would be attainable.
He passed 4 cars in a no passing zone a second before the crash. He pays a ton in a civil settlement and perhaps some criminal liability on likely reduced charges but yes he could have had a shot at an NFL career still.
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:26 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
70 yards by the time Lacy got out of the lane which is approximately 1 second from impact. Was the deceased supposed to wait another half second before getting out of the way himself? He’s not a F1 professional driver. He was an older man who thought he was about to die and got out of the way instinctively.
So I guess you are just going to gloss over the fact that the old man driving the truck )that police said he slammed on his brakes) said - on body cam footage:
1. He never hit his brakes (the old man like police said he did)
2. The lady directly behind him is actually the one who swerved into traffic and caused the accident.
All this after the police told that old man to make sure he puts that it was Lacy’s car on his written statement.
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:28 pm to BigBinBR
quote:
So I guess you are just going to gloss over the fact that the old man driving the truck )that police said he slammed on his brakes) said - on body cam footage:
Yeah, he didn’t watch the video at all or is just trolling for a reaction
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:30 pm to BigBinBR
quote:
2. The lady directly behind him is actually the one who swerved into traffic and caused the accident.
Either way none of this happens if Lacy doesn’t pass 4 cars around a curve in a no passing zone. There is a reason you have no passing zones which is to prevent accidents like this one.
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:32 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
Ok my bad so a lady swerved to avoid Lacy. Either way none of this happens if Lacy doesn’t recklessly pass 4 cars at high speed in a no passing zone. There is a reason you have no passing zones which is to prevent accidents like this one.
No. She swerved so she didn’t run into the back of the old man. He was traveling at 28 and she was traveling at 40+ and was distracted by eating the Funyuns in her lap.
They little have the box data from all the vehicles.
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:33 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Yeah, he didn’t watch the video at all or is just trolling for a reaction
Watched the accident video. No I did not watch 50 minutes of his attorney talking in a paid infomercial with no representation for the victim giving their side.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:35 pm to Utah_CUtiger
INTERNET PUSSIES TRIGGERED THE DEATH
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:35 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
No I did not watch 50 minutes of his attorney talking in a paid infomercial with no representation for the victim giving their side.
Well then just admit you’re talking out of your arse before talking out of your arse
They have objective tangible data recorded by the vehicles involved in the crash, but if you “don’t want to watch an infomercial” don’t let me stop you looking like an uninformed idiot
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:37 pm to Jebadeb
His family should sue the fock out of that parish.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:37 pm to lsufball19
It was obvious .. proof 1000 % .. watched every second.. internet pussies should be put to death ..90% of these ranters . Blood on their hands and then lake of fire
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:38 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
Ok my bad so a lady swerved to avoid Lacy. Either way none of this happens if Lacy doesn’t recklessly pass 4 cars at high speed in a no passing zone. There is a reason you have no passing zones which is to prevent accidents like this one.
He was back into the right lane 72 yards before the crash.
You are getting the story wrong.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:38 pm to lsufball19
quote:
They have objective tangible data
What is objective about his attorney running a 50 minute infomercial with no opposing opinions or evidence presented. There is a reason grand jury’s indict 99% of the time hearing only one side of the evidence.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:39 pm to MillerLiteTime
VIDEO … sue the internet pussies
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:40 pm to jangalang
quote:
He was back into the right lane 72 yards before the crash.
Now convert that 72 yards into time until impact with two vehicles traveling towards each other and Lacy traveling at high speed.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:40 pm to TideSaint
quote:
Is this a serious question?
Yes. It took 10 months to pull street camera footage?
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:41 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
What is objective about his attorney running a 50 minute infomercial with no opposing opinions or evidence presented.
The data is objective. His attorney talks about it. The body cam footage is also objective. He talks about that too. You don’t need to listen to his attorney’s opinion to form your own. But if you skipped over the actual objective facts he uses to form his opinion, then you’re an uninformed idiot.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 7:42 pm to MillerLiteTime
LACEY NEVER SHOULD HAVE KILLED HIMSELF . Never listen to Internet pussies
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News