Started By
Message
re: Does Ole Miss have a legit chance to win the secw
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:17 pm to VivaZapata27
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:17 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
So you're theory is that Alabama will be worse on offense and defense next year because they lose most of their production on both sides of the ball? See, I still think Alabama will be a top 10 team despite that. I mean I have no facts to back that up because the season has yet to be played but I reel like what they have coming back is just as important to my evaluation as who isn't coming back. More so, in fact.
Don't do that. Only RB10 has the level of intelligence needed to note players leaving.
We just have to wait for model RB11 to come out to tell us about players that can replace that lost production.
1
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:20 pm to pankReb
quote:
Is this what the entire argument is all about? No shite we have people leaving. Absolutely no one is arguing against that.
OM fans say they should be better, and back it up with opinions.
I, and a few others, say they should be worse, and back it up with facts.
That's the long and short of it.
quote:
So you're theory is that Alabama will be worse on offense and defense next year because they lose most of their production on both sides of the ball? See, I still think Alabama will be a top 10 team despite that. I mean I have no facts to back that up because the season has yet to be played but I reel like what they have coming back is just as important to my evaluation as who isn't coming back. More so, in fact.
Yeah, lets not start comparing Alabama's depth to OM's.
Thanks.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:24 pm to pankReb
Oh wow
So, two of you are going to act like OM's roster is in the same conversation as Alabama's........
Okay then
So, two of you are going to act like OM's roster is in the same conversation as Alabama's........
Okay then
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:25 pm to RB10
quote:
OM fans say they should be better, and back it up with opinions
There you go again...putting argumebts in other people's mouths.
I don't remember stating that our defense is guaranteed to be better. Do you WIO?
Hell....we've both already corrected you on that. You just can't help but ignoring it. That's ok....it's a running theme from you in this thread. Hell....I'm pretty sure you're ignoring this post as well.
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:27 pm to RB10
Haha. I got you. Why don't you just come out and say that Ole Miss can't afford to lose players because they are just poor little Ole Miss and don't really get good players. Maybe just once in a blue moon. That's what you've been trying to say all along.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:27 pm to RB10
quote:
So, two of you are going to act like OM's roster is in the same conversation as Alabama's........
Okay then
still putting arguments in other people's mouths.
Okay then.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:29 pm to pankReb
Sorry, it's easier to type OM fans than go look at each individual user.
Here you go:
pankReb says they should be as good, and backs it up with opinions.
Whereisomaha says they should be better, and backs it up with opinions.
VivaZapata27 says they will be better, without question, and backs it up with opinions.
Here you go:
pankReb says they should be as good, and backs it up with opinions.
Whereisomaha says they should be better, and backs it up with opinions.
VivaZapata27 says they will be better, without question, and backs it up with opinions.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:29 pm to VivaZapata27
This is fun. I wonder what I'm going to say next.
Maybe I should ask rb10. He obviously already has my arguments against him layed out for me. I must have forgotten my script he wrote out for me.
Maybe I should ask rb10. He obviously already has my arguments against him layed out for me. I must have forgotten my script he wrote out for me.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:30 pm to RB10
Actually we were trying to have a conversation comparing two different Ole Miss rosters. One who's worst class was ranked 45, and another who's worst ranked class is 15. But we are arguing with an idiot apparently.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:32 pm to Wranglerinbama
quote:
Wranglerinbama
Does Ole Miss have a legit chance to win the secw by Wranglerinbama
For once and for all..
Yes, they absolutely have a legit chance. Did they lose some players? Yep, every team does last time I checked. But they have one BIG advantage - a veteran QB.
I would rank teams' chances thusly:
1. Bama
2. LSU
2. Ole Miss
4. A&M
5. Arkansas
6. Auburn
7. Miss State
But IMO 5,6 and 7 are not far behind 2,3 and 4 at all. It's wide open.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:32 pm to pankReb
quote:
Maybe I should ask rb10. He obviously already has my arguments against him layed out for me. I must have forgotten my script he wrote out for me.
Something to the effect of "We won't be worse", backed up by opinions.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:32 pm to RB10
quote:
pankReb says they should be as good
Pank says our defense should be right where it was last year....which is average.(even though, after further looking, our defense was slightly below average last year).
We have also tried to correct you with some factual information that you refuse to acknowledge. Once again....that's not our fault.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:34 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
But we are arguing with an idiot apparently.
Two starters on the bench for the vast majority of the year is an opinion.....apparently.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:35 pm to pankReb
quote:
We have also tried to correct you with some factual information that you refuse to acknowledge. Once again....that's not our fault
You really should brush up on "factual".
Telling me two injured players are returning is factual. Telling me they will replace the production of departed players is not.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:35 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
But we are arguing with an idiot apparently.
Says the guy claiming OM "can't" be worse.....
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:36 pm to RB10
quote:
Telling me they will replace the production of departed players is not.
Thanks for once again putting words in people's mouths. You're pretty good at that.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:37 pm to pankReb
quote:
Thanks for once again putting words in people's mouths. You're pretty good at that.
It's kind of like you "correcting" me when I say 11 defensive players who played major roles are gone.
Even though it's a fact.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:39 pm to RB10
You just ignore facts anyway.
Fact- Defensive line returns 3/4 starters and a former 3 year starter and the tackle that ended the year starting. Irrelevant I suppose because we lost three of our ten man d line rotation.
Fact- both starting linebackers led power five teams in tackles last year. Irrelevant though because lost guys.
Fact- Secondary returns both starting Corners and an all American safety. Irrelevant though because factually two other safeties graduated and they had a bunch of tackles that Ole miss cannot replace because nobody else but them can make tackles.
Fact- Defensive line returns 3/4 starters and a former 3 year starter and the tackle that ended the year starting. Irrelevant I suppose because we lost three of our ten man d line rotation.
Fact- both starting linebackers led power five teams in tackles last year. Irrelevant though because lost guys.
Fact- Secondary returns both starting Corners and an all American safety. Irrelevant though because factually two other safeties graduated and they had a bunch of tackles that Ole miss cannot replace because nobody else but them can make tackles.
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:41 pm to RB10
quote:
It's kind of like you "correcting" me when I say 11 defensive players who played major roles are gone
So we lost three linebackers who played "major roles" in our defense yet we return last years best linebacker in a two linebacker defense. -per your opinion.
Do you see why your arguments are hilarious to us?
Page 11 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News