Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/15/16 at 8:46 am to Huddie Leadbetter
I will, particularly when Notre Dame and Nebraska are still being listed. There is not a single thing "elite" about Nebraska's football program today.
It's also hilarious that you think one guy's opinion actually makes this some sort of definitive statement.
It's also hilarious that you think one guy's opinion actually makes this some sort of definitive statement.
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 8:48 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 8:47 am to SmokeTide
Elite
Posted on 11/15/16 at 8:54 am to RB10
So you're slowly coming around to my very first post in this thread.......
"Elite", in my opinion, are the blue blood types that have won numerous national titles, including at least 2 since integration, plus Michigan.
Alabama
Notre Dame
USC
OU
Ohio State
Texas
Michigan (won more games than any other team)
Nebraska (falling off sharply)
----------------------------------------------------
Notre Dame, I would note, has played in the national title game since LSU has. It isn't at all reasonable to not consider Notre Dame a blue blood, considering all their national titles. Ask the average football fan across the nation to pick between LSU and Notre Dame as an "elite" program and I doubt many would even take you seriously.
"Elite", in my opinion, are the blue blood types that have won numerous national titles, including at least 2 since integration, plus Michigan.
Alabama
Notre Dame
USC
OU
Ohio State
Texas
Michigan (won more games than any other team)
Nebraska (falling off sharply)
----------------------------------------------------
Notre Dame, I would note, has played in the national title game since LSU has. It isn't at all reasonable to not consider Notre Dame a blue blood, considering all their national titles. Ask the average football fan across the nation to pick between LSU and Notre Dame as an "elite" program and I doubt many would even take you seriously.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 8:56 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
Huddie Leadbetter
I'm not reading all that shite. Being a blue blood is not the only thing that makes you an elite football program.
That notion is borderline retarded.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 8:58 am to Huddie Leadbetter
Right now IMO
Alabama (elite)
Notre Dame (has won anything in 25 years)
USC (needed to cheat to have their last dynasty)
OU (not bad choice
Ohio State (elite)
Texas (el ohh el)
Michigan (up and coming)
Nebraska (product of schedule)
I would put Clemson above all these teams and probably Wisconsin above most of them as far as what they have proven to me in the last decade.
Alabama (elite)
Notre Dame (has won anything in 25 years)
USC (needed to cheat to have their last dynasty)
OU (not bad choice
Ohio State (elite)
Texas (el ohh el)
Michigan (up and coming)
Nebraska (product of schedule)
I would put Clemson above all these teams and probably Wisconsin above most of them as far as what they have proven to me in the last decade.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 8:58 am to flyingtexastiger
quote:
Nice try, but your OP is an unmitigated troll attempt. Don't crawfish now and try to say you consider us a "potential elite team"
First off I've been very unbiased on my post history about LSU..."Hell I thought you would make playoff last year". Keep telling yourself whatever feel like. I simply ask was LSU still elite program...so quit BS passive aggressive chit when you guys get defensive about a subject. I'm just some anonymous Bama fan, you guys have been reduced to hoping a coach retire rather than going through them.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:00 am to Bengal tail
Like I said before, if it wasn't for football the bambies* wouldn't have word to say on here because the rest of the there sports programs r hot garbage
Nomination for "Try Hard Post of the Day
*Quit trying to make 'bambies' happen. It's not going to happen.
Nomination for "Try Hard Post of the Day
*Quit trying to make 'bambies' happen. It's not going to happen.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:01 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Right now IMO
Alabama (elite)
Notre Dame (has won anything in 25 years)
USC (needed to cheat to have their last dynasty)
OU (not bad choice
Ohio State (elite)
Texas (el ohh el)
Michigan (up and coming)
Nebraska (product of schedule)
I would put Clemson above all these teams and probably Wisconsin above most of them as far as what they have proven to me in the last decade
That's a very reasonable observation. As I said in a post this morning, there is a difference in elite team and elite program. Clemson certainly is a more elite team "right now", as you say, than most of those 8 teams.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:02 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
I would put Clemson above all these teams and probably Wisconsin above most of them as far as what they have proven to me in the last decade.
Dude's entire argument is you can't be an elite program unless you are a traditional blue blood.
I guess Miami and FSU weren't elite in the 80's and 90's. Who knew?
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:06 am to RB10
quote:
Dude's entire argument is you can't be an elite program unless you are a traditional blue blood.
I guess Miami and FSU weren't elite in the 80's and 90's. Who knew?
I didn't read the whole thread.
But I imagine his list has criteria that I would call retarded
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:09 am to RB10
quote:
RB10
What part do not get about a difference in elite team and elite program?
Try to give a compliment and guys like you just refuse to have it. Reminds me of the LSU fan in the Home Depot in Carrollton Ga that blew up when I suggested, in 2011, that the rematch should be a good game.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:10 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
I didn't read the whole thread.
But I imagine his list has criteria that I would call retarded
My "criteria" which I posted before I even found the ABC and ESPN articles, is the same as theirs, which is the same as most college football fans in this nation....
ABC News
ESPN
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 9:12 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:12 am to Huddie Leadbetter
those are liberal retard sites. I don't click on them
I think my opinion is just as good as theirs.
I think my opinion is just as good as theirs.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:13 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
What part do not get about a difference in elite team and elite program?
I'm fully aware. There aren't 5 programs in the country, all things considered, that are better than LSU right now. That makes them elite. LSU may be the 15th best team in the country this year though. It's funny because you're the one having difficulty separating the two.
Again, anyone who lists Nebraska as an elite program in CFB today has almost zero credibility.
quote:
Try to give a compliment and guys like you just refuse to have it.
Sorry your attempt at a compliment is full of dumb arse notions.
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 9:18 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:13 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
My "criteria" which I posted before I even found the ABC and ESPN articles, is the same as theirs, which is the same as most college football fans in this nation....
"Only traditional bluebloods can be elite"
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 9:16 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:14 am to mattgr1983
Upvote. That's what fans do.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:22 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
those are liberal retard sites. I don't click on them
You don't read or watch ESPN. Pardon me for calling bullschit on that.
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:27 am to Huddie Leadbetter
quote:
You don't read or watch ESPN. Pardon me for calling bullschit on that.
haven't in the past 5 years other than college football.
its usually on mute too. (i don't watch Pawl, College football live or SEC now either).
sorry you watch mike and mike and pardon the interruption.
what a tool you are.
This post was edited on 11/15/16 at 9:28 am
Posted on 11/15/16 at 9:40 am to SmokeTide
No not elite now but could be very soon with proper hire. If they come out of their Paul Bunyan coma, they could be really good!
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News