Started By
Message
re: Do Alabama fans think Peterson made the interception?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:49 am to wilceaux
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:49 am to wilceaux
quote:
I have it on DVR. Don't bother.
Do us rational people a favor and just STFU.
Someone (non-LSU fan) requested it.
Do you really think i'm uploading it just for a douchebag like you?
0
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:50 am to arlo
in regards to the camera angles
Bama did play a great game though. and deserved the win as much as we would have.
Bama did play a great game though. and deserved the win as much as we would have.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 10:51 am
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:51 am to BamainCFL
quote:
Did he have posession at that point though?
Yes. He had possession immediately when the ball hit his hands, which is part of what made it such a great play.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:52 am to wilceaux
quote:
Yes. He had possession immediately when the ball hit his hands, which is part of what made it such a great play.
Absolutely. The ball "stuck" in Peterson's hands.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:53 am to superman
quote:
I think the bottom line is that the wrong call was made on the FIELD, because the play happened so quickly. When the replay officials sat down and looked at the replays, there was nothing there that they could use to overturn the call, because ALL of the camera angles sucked and left at least a little doubt as to whether or not he had possession with a foot in bounds.
I maintain that if the play had been called an INT on the field, it would have been upheld.
I concur.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:54 am to superman
quote:
I think the bottom line is that the wrong call was made on the FIELD, because the play happened so quickly. When the replay officials sat down and looked at the replays, there was nothing there that they could use to overturn the call, because ALL of the camera angles sucked and left at least a little doubt as to whether or not he had possession with a foot in bounds.
I maintain that if the play had been called an INT on the field, it would have been upheld.
Superman made a good point here, but yes I do believe it was a pick.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:55 am to PurpleandGold Motown
quote:
I concur.
Woooooaaa, that's creepy, I didn't even see your post and quoted the same guy at the same time.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:57 am to Prominentwon
quote:
Maybe so, but rather than getting that CHANCE, the refs take it away from them. That is the main issue I have with it.
this is correct
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:00 am to NATidefan
quote:
Superman made a good point here, but yes I do believe it was a pick.
That's a bullshite point. There was PLENTY of visual evidence. The refs completely blew that fricking call.
Now, we still could've stopped Bama the very next play and forced either a long FG or a punt, but not getting that pick was huge any way you look at it.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:05 am to MightyYat
So, what about the bad spots that we got all game? That first drive was a preview of what was to come. JJ had the first down by at least 1 foot. The running into the punter was another one, since when is there a 5.5 yard penalty? Shall I go on? There were MULTIPLE missed calls in this game and they conveniently were in Alabama's favor.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:06 am to FC Barcelona
His front foot was on the line, so he was out of bounds at that point... so no INT... it was a great play but was an inch away from being an INT.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:08 am to arlo
((I also think Bama could have stuck it in the endzone again instead of taking a knee with about 2 minutes left to go))
Thinking is something you should stay away from!!!
Thinking is something you should stay away from!!!
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:08 am to spacewrangler
quote:
His front foot was on the line, so he was out of bounds at that point... so no INT... it was a great play but was an inch away from being an INT.
ARE YOU frickING BLIND? I'm sure everyone will agree with me, but SHOW ME evidence of this a-hole!
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:09 am to spacewrangler
I am seriously not suprised to see you deny the obvious. You are really a pretty worthless poster and likely individual in real life too.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:10 am to cajun33tiger
Might as well let it go with that idiot. He is one of the dumbest posters on this board that is really totally worthless.
I take it you are not on the sec rant that much. Most of us here have just conceded this guy is a worthless asshat when he posts.
I take it you are not on the sec rant that much. Most of us here have just conceded this guy is a worthless asshat when he posts.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:11 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Tiger in Miami you need to watch the flames...
I have an opinion on why they made the call and it is becuase it appears his front foot was on the line... it is real close. Peterson is a great player.
I have an opinion on why they made the call and it is becuase it appears his front foot was on the line... it is real close. Peterson is a great player.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:12 am to FC Barcelona
I do. However, since the call on the field was incomplete, I don't think that the video evidence was especially compelling to overturn it.
The call on the field should have been an interception, though. I still think we win the game regardless.
The call on the field should have been an interception, though. I still think we win the game regardless.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:15 am to spacewrangler
real close????.....the freakin' divit in the field of play not to mention the second foot that was dragged say different. Flat out, it was a bad call......but that wasn't what cost us the game.....it was our coaching plain and simple.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:15 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
Once again Tiger in Miami you need to watch it with the flames/personal attacks. You need to grow up son and quit acting like a douche.
It was a great play by a great player but not a INT if his front foot was on the line.. he was out of bounds... it was really close.
It was a great play by a great player but not a INT if his front foot was on the line.. he was out of bounds... it was really close.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:20 am to puttytat
agree the back foot was in the field but the front foot appears to be on the line at the same time.. so he would be out of bounds... I really wish he would have gotten the call becuase I feel we still would have won and then there wouldn't be this big stink on the game.
Peterson played a hell of a game. Too bad he couldn't have made it through the whole game without the cramping due to having to cover JJ the game. It just show how physicall JJ is and what effort PP had to excert to cover him.
PP IMO is a stud, didn't think he was as good as LSU fans were making him out to be before the game but now yes!
Peterson played a hell of a game. Too bad he couldn't have made it through the whole game without the cramping due to having to cover JJ the game. It just show how physicall JJ is and what effort PP had to excert to cover him.
PP IMO is a stud, didn't think he was as good as LSU fans were making him out to be before the game but now yes!
Page 5 of 8
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News