Started By
Message

re: Confirmed: NCAA investigation of Auburn continues

Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:44 am to
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:44 am to
Questions for the board that no one knows answers to, but everyone likely has a thought or opinion on:

Why now with Thamel's story? This happened over a month ago. Did it take this long to get the info comfirmed and coaches on record? Was he hoping for something else and went with this when he didnt get the bigger scoop (we already knew investigation was ongoing, so only "new" info is the exchange w/ chiz & ncaa)? Or is this the tease piece that often drops before a series of articles that take longer to get attorneys to approve?


(before I get a tinfoil label for last question let me say that I worked in media for 8 years before starting own buiness 2 yrs ago. I know the process. I also know my former employer was one of many who filed request for info with au that was denied)
This post was edited on 7/14/11 at 8:49 am
Posted by Itsme2011
Member since Jan 2011
855 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:44 am to
The Roe layeth the smacketh downeth!!!!

[insert video of a missile blowing up a barn and you get the thought]
Posted by Auburntiger
BTR area
Member since Mar 2005
14448 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:47 am to
quote:

You should be very, very, very worried about both.




I was concerned that you were going to state that we should be very, very, very, VERY worried...
This post was edited on 7/14/11 at 8:49 am
Posted by Auburntiger
BTR area
Member since Mar 2005
14448 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:48 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/14/11 at 8:48 am
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53474 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:49 am to
quote:

bamasgot13


got tired of recent AU publicity and tried to smear
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54836 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Did it take this long to get the info comfirmed and coachex on record?
quote:

Was he hoping for something else and went with this when he didnt get the bigger scoop (we already knew investigation was ongoing, so only "new" info is the exchange w/ chiz & ncaa)?
I'm hoping it was one of these 2.
quote:

Or is this the tease piece that often drops before a series of articles that take longer to get attorneys to approve?
This is possible as well.
Posted by McGregor
Member since Feb 2011
6667 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:49 am to
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
10849 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:50 am to
More than likely they are waiting to see if they can get any crumbs from the FBI. I believe the FBI is still investigating the crooked politicians in Alabama and the NCAA is more than likely looking to see if anything more turns up since their powers(NCAA)of enforcement are limited.
Posted by Auburntiger
BTR area
Member since Mar 2005
14448 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:50 am to
quote:

McGregor


Posted by townhallsavoy
Member since Oct 2007
3045 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Why now with Thamel's story? This happened over a month ago. Did it take this long to get the info comfirmed and coachex on record? Was he hoping for something else and went with this when he didnt get the bigger scoop (we already knew investigation was ongoing, so only "new" info is the exchange w/ chiz & ncaa)? Or is this the tease piece that often drops before a series of articles that take longer to get attorneys to approve?


You've already stated that no one knows the answer, so you're aren't going to consider any response as valid.

Why ask for opinions?

When I analyze your multiple choices, the only one that is capable of being said is the last one.

You're insinuating some bigger piece is about to drop from Pete Thamel.
Posted by Supravol22
Member since Jan 2011
14512 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:51 am to
Dammit what'd I miss?
Posted by msu202020
Member since Feb 2011
4315 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Some have speculated that it's still open because they've uncovered something connected to Miss State.




Look, if any Mississippi State boosters tried to orchestrate a pay for play, we will be punished, and will deserve it.

Your comment is just funny though. Do you really believe that if we had come up with the 180k, and offered it to the Newtons, that Cam wouldn't have been playing at Mississippi State last year?
Posted by townhallsavoy
Member since Oct 2007
3045 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Your comment is just funny though. Do you really believe that if we had come up with the 180k, and offered it to the Newtons, that Cam wouldn't have been playing at Mississippi State last year?


Why the frick can people not read on this site?

Did I posit anything about Miss State?

Did I say, "Miss State is being investigated and not Auburn"?

Anywhere?

Being an English teacher, it really saddens me to see that I'm doing a shitty job teaching America how to read. Every time I get on this website, I feel the need to rewrite my entire curriculum because obviously reading comprehension needs an overhaul.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53474 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:56 am to
has thamal released anything substantial about AU, ever? or has it all just been articles about which were not that big of a deal
Posted by Itsme2011
Member since Jan 2011
855 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Look, if any Mississippi State boosters tried to orchestrate a pay for play, we will be punished, and will deserve it.


100% agree

quote:

Do you really believe that if we had come up with the 180k, and offered it to the Newtons, that Cam wouldn't have been playing at Mississippi State last year?



CORRECT! That's what most fail to consider.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53474 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Do you really believe that if we had come up with the 180k, and offered it to the Newtons, that Cam wouldn't have been playing at Mississippi State last year?


where have you been? they never said moo moo had the money but that cecil wanted 180k and that moo moo people were trying to get it
Posted by NEWOTiger
New Orleans, La.
Member since May 2010
449 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Still nothing? It sure is taking a lot of time for the NCAA to close the case on something Auburn fans claim did not happen. If there was absolutely nothing here, the NCAA would have closed this case a long time ago to focus on OSU and UNC. This is possibly the biggest case the NCAA has dealt with in college football since SMU. They are going to take their sweet arse time getting their facts straight making sure they do this correctly.


And STILL no PLOI after nine months plus of the most unprecedented scrutiny a university has seen from the NCAA, media, bloggers, etc.

Take their sweet time my arse. If they had enough for a PLOI you can bet your sweet arse M. Emmert would have walked that shite into AU himself by now.

Until a PLOI is issued I have to believe they got jack shite!
This post was edited on 7/14/11 at 9:25 am
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
90240 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:06 am to
Be thinking of a new avatar and Sig pick,cause they don't waste that much time down there and come back with nothing...
Posted by bama my heart
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Member since Mar 2007
1293 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:13 am to
This whole thing looks stupid to me. How can the NCAA investigaton still be going on when they ruled on this back in November. Wouldn't that make them look stupid that they made a QUICK decision on something, and it turned out that they should have ruled differently, and would have if they had taken the proper amount of time to make a decision. As they say "haste makes waste". A lot of us would like to think that this makes Auburn look bad, and that they should be scared, but bottom line is, it makes the NCAA look like they don't know what they're doing.
It looks like it just depends on their mood as to how they respond, and people say women are moody.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
90240 posts
Posted on 7/14/11 at 9:15 am to
Ummm they ruled our players eligible in the textbook scandal,same for Ohio States players and Reggie Bush...
Jump to page
Page First 23 24 25 26 27 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 25 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter