Started By
Message
Posted on 1/10/15 at 8:41 pm to DawgRff
Maxed out means potential in this case & I agree
The best you can hope for is a Mark Ingram type player.. not Adrian Peterson or a Barry Sanders.
The best you can hope for is a Mark Ingram type player.. not Adrian Peterson or a Barry Sanders.
Posted on 1/10/15 at 8:50 pm to bluenutsquirrel
quote:
The best you can hope for is a Mark Ingram type player.. not Adrian Peterson or a Barry Sanders.
Chubb has a lot to improve, especially vision wise. He took the wrong whole plenty of times.
Then again, over the half time I watched LSU, I just saw Fournette run right into a defender rather than avoid him, so his vision can certainly stand to improve as well.
However, I can't wait to see MIchel 2.0 next year.
Posted on 1/10/15 at 8:51 pm to Adam4LSU
quote:
chubb wouldn't either with our passing game
Anyone that thinks otherwise is smoking some really good shite

Do you even watch football? I mean - American football?
Chubb had his best games when everyone, including Georgia, knew we couldn't pass.
Case in point: Against Louisville - the 3rd ranked run defense in the country, they stacked the box against the run, then Mason was knocked out of the game at the end of the first half. We couldn't pass - at all. Everyone knew it, especially Louisville.
Chubb ran for over 250.
The ONLY thing that kept Chubb from going for over 2,000 yards was the fact that we HAD a passing game (such as it was).
Kind of sad how LSU fan will grasp at straws to keep pretending that somehow Fournette is something he isn't.
Meanwhile, Chubb IS everything Fournette isn't: All-SEC running back, SEC Freshman of The Year.
Deal. With. It.

But hey, Fournette is really very very good. Just not the best.

Posted on 1/10/15 at 8:54 pm to GoldenDawg
Chubb was a total stud this season...LF will be a total stud next year.
Posted on 1/10/15 at 8:58 pm to GoldenDawg
Their fanbase has already made it abundantly clear that they have the most inept passing attack in college football, so Fournette isn't going to meet his potential at this level.
When you consider he received a staggering 32 more carries than Fournette, it's obvious that Chubb is being run to the ground.
When you consider he received a staggering 32 more carries than Fournette, it's obvious that Chubb is being run to the ground.
This post was edited on 1/10/15 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 1/10/15 at 8:58 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
You idiots keep saying this but you can never provide any proof. Just because you spout it over and over doesn't mean it's true.
Thank you for providing a textbook example for point 1 in my previous post.
Posted on 1/10/15 at 9:55 pm to GoldenDawg
I'm gonna go with they are both freaks of nature, but both have a lot to work on. If they can stay healthy, it will be a Day 1 argument on who will go first between them.
And whoever said Gurley is overrated, your an idiot. Injury prone would be the correct tag.
And whoever said Gurley is overrated, your an idiot. Injury prone would be the correct tag.
quote:-Hagakure
Having only talent is the lowest tier of usefulness.
Posted on 1/10/15 at 10:11 pm to unbanmepls
quote:And thank you for again proving my point.
Thank you for providing a textbook example for point 1 in my previous post.

Popular
Back to top
