Started By
Message
re: "Cam Newton Spots DB 5 Yards"
Posted on 9/26/10 at 7:35 pm to oklahogjr
Posted on 9/26/10 at 7:35 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
nothing wrong with moonshine. Not a fan of meth. So what did Lee greenwood do except frick u in the arse cuz i have no idea who he is
I'm sorry to inform you that your gay fantasy is exactly that. It makes me uncomfortable that you are envisioning Lee Greenwood in a gay romp but I guess there is nothing I can do about that.
No need to be ashamed. A LOT of folks like Lee Greenwood and a LOT of folks are gay. I just thought it was a funny picture.
Care to defend your statement about how friggin Broderick Green is a better rusher and Mallet is a better passer than Cam?
1
Posted on 9/26/10 at 7:42 pm to tkane311
Mallett is a better passer. If you argue that then you are an idiot. Mallett is pretty much the best passer in the country. These passer efficiency numbers can be inflated, by lets say highschool offenses that don't throw down the field but instead throwing short routes. The thing about mallett is he is in a pro style offense that is designed to throw down the field and throw the screens so he won't have quite the passer efficiency
Posted on 9/26/10 at 7:46 pm to auburnu008
Now let us finally conclude our worship service with a word of prayer. Bow your heads Aubies: "Angles, Angles in glory land rejoice, for flying forth headfirst from thy dim light in the barn is thou savior, Cam 'Superman' Newton. Please, oh Lord, give thy anointed one that blue helmet ye so promised. And, if you can find it within yer heart, can you add some extra padding? We're on our faces here. Amen."
Posted on 9/26/10 at 7:48 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Mallett is a better passer. If you argue that then you are an idiot. Mallett is pretty much the best passer in the country. These passer efficiency numbers can be inflated, by lets say highschool offenses that don't throw down the field but instead throwing short routes. The thing about mallett is he is in a pro style offense that is designed to throw down the field and throw the screens so he won't have quite the passer efficiency
Mallet is a better passer, no doubt. Said it in my original response. BUT, if you are going to post something as dumb as what you did, I'm going to address the whole thing. Efficiency numbers can be inflated but it is all about scoring points, right? If I had to choose between 9 TD's and 3 Ints and 10 TD's and 5 Ints, I'm going with 9 and 3 (Cam). But yes, Mallet is a better passer.
High School offense? Oooo....burn. 4-0
Thanks for addressing your dumbass post...now back to your gay fantasy. Try to exclude me this time. Disgusting.
Posted on 9/26/10 at 7:51 pm to oklahogjr
quote:btw...I'm just ribbin you. You wanted a response with that post...was just giving you one. I'm really not that big of an arse. And matchup wise, Arky scares the hell out of me.
oklahogjr
Posted on 9/26/10 at 7:55 pm to tkane311
quote:good one i guess?
Did you know that more corndogs are sold in Baton Rouge on Saturday nights than anywhere else in the world?
Posted on 9/26/10 at 8:16 pm to tkane311
i'm just messin with you also the green thing was a complete joke.
Posted on 9/26/10 at 8:19 pm to LSU8932
Cam is a helluva a runner and very fast for a man his size.
That being said, that DB/LB whatever is gassed or something. He's not running fast at all. Count the steps he takes between yard lines.
That being said, that DB/LB whatever is gassed or something. He's not running fast at all. Count the steps he takes between yard lines.
Posted on 9/26/10 at 8:43 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
These passer efficiency numbers can be inflated, by lets say highschool offenses that don't throw down the field but instead throwing short routes
Cam is averaging 16 yards/completion, Mallett is averaging 15 yds
Im definitely not saying cam is a better passer, just saying your theory of Cam's passer rating being inflated because of short passes is offbase.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News