Started By
Message
Cadillac & Brown vs. Ingram & TR
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:42 pm
A Barn homer posted on a recent thread that Cadillac and Brown were better and it's "not even close yet".
As freshmen:
1. Ingram 738yds 5.1avg 12td
2. Caddy 655yds 5.1avg 6td
3. TR 642yds 5.1avg 6td
4. Brown 386yds 4.0avg 2td
Best Season TDs:
1. Ingram 18td (15rush 3rec) 2009 (not done yet)
2. Caddy 17td (all rush) 2003
Best Season Rushing Yards:
1. Ingram 1542 2009 (not done yet)
2. Caddy 1388 2003
Best Season Rush Average:
1. Ingram 6.2 2009 (not done yet - for better or worse)
2. Brown 6.0 2004
Best Season Rec. Yards/TDs
1. Ingram 322 & 3 2009 (not done yet)
2. Brown 313 & 1 2004
Best Season Combined Stats:
1. Ingram & TR 2184yds 21 rush tds 2009 (not done yet)
2. Caddy & Brown 2164yds 20 rush tds 2004
If TR gets 14+ yards rushing in the bowl game, both he and Ingram will have had better Freshman years that either Brown or Williams.
Ingram & TR are 1 and 2 years in and they are already the better duo. So STFU.
As freshmen:
1. Ingram 738yds 5.1avg 12td
2. Caddy 655yds 5.1avg 6td
3. TR 642yds 5.1avg 6td
4. Brown 386yds 4.0avg 2td
Best Season TDs:
1. Ingram 18td (15rush 3rec) 2009 (not done yet)
2. Caddy 17td (all rush) 2003
Best Season Rushing Yards:
1. Ingram 1542 2009 (not done yet)
2. Caddy 1388 2003
Best Season Rush Average:
1. Ingram 6.2 2009 (not done yet - for better or worse)
2. Brown 6.0 2004
Best Season Rec. Yards/TDs
1. Ingram 322 & 3 2009 (not done yet)
2. Brown 313 & 1 2004
Best Season Combined Stats:
1. Ingram & TR 2184yds 21 rush tds 2009 (not done yet)
2. Caddy & Brown 2164yds 20 rush tds 2004
If TR gets 14+ yards rushing in the bowl game, both he and Ingram will have had better Freshman years that either Brown or Williams.
Ingram & TR are 1 and 2 years in and they are already the better duo. So STFU.
8
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:43 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
duck
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:44 pm to ACL11190
duck....
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:44 pm to rbWarEagle
goose.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:44 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
if i could take any of the four i would take TR and Caddy.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:45 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
... and no way in hell are they better than Caddy and Ronnie... good try though.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:46 pm to FleshEatingSalsa
Caddy and Ronnie also had a passing game that was worth a shite all year long.
All the games I watched of you all this year, you had to run more because your QB was a steaming pile all year long, and your WR's weren't helping much either.
If I was wrong, JJ would have had a WAYYY better year receiving.
All the games I watched of you all this year, you had to run more because your QB was a steaming pile all year long, and your WR's weren't helping much either.
If I was wrong, JJ would have had a WAYYY better year receiving.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:47 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
and no way in hell are they better than Caddy and Ronnie... good try though.
Where do Felix and DMac fit into that discussion? I'd have to say I'd like my chances with that tandem against most any I've ever seen. Not to flame, but if you have this conversation, I think those two have to be in it as well.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:47 pm to rbWarEagle
Ingram is 19 and Richardson is 18. Ingram is just as good NOW as either of them were in college. If Richardson makes the same improvment from his fr to soph year that Ingram did then watch out.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:47 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
... and no way in hell are they better than Caddy and Ronnie... good try though.
Yes! Of course they are! Because...because...
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:48 pm to BenHOGan
nobody cares about arkansas, dude.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:49 pm to BenHOGan
RB & CW > DM FJ > TR MI
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:50 pm to auzach91
quote:
nobody cares about arkansas, dude.
Stay classy, Auburn. Stay classy.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:50 pm to DByrd2
quote:
Caddy and Ronnie also had a passing game that was worth a shite all year long.
FYI Caddy and Ronnie had 392 carries in 2004.
Ingram and Richardson had 375 in 2009.
This post was edited on 12/21/09 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:50 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
RB & CW > DM FJ > TR MI
I'd swap your first two and call it good.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:50 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
RB & CW > DM FJ > TR MI
No they weren't dude. Dmac and Felix were fricking insane in college.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:51 pm to ACL11190
That's because our Offense was WAY better than Bama's.
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:51 pm to DByrd2
quote:
you had to run more because your QB was a steaming pile all year long
FALSE
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:52 pm to ACL11190
quote:
No they weren't dude. Dmac and Felix were fricking insane in college.
Nope.. I stand by my post!
Posted on 12/21/09 at 3:52 pm to ACL11190
I'm sorry, but I have got to say from my own, outside perspective that RB and CW were the best I've seen. The numbers may be different, but that is how I saw it 
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News