Started By
Message
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:40 pm to JoLeUGA
quote:FICTION
Saying something without means is not a fact.
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:40 pm to thebearisdead
quote:
Descending order per football revenue intake...
UF
AU
UA
UT
LSU
UGA
UK
USC
Arkansas
Vanderbilt
UM
MS
Link? I found this:
LINK
This post was edited on 10/2/09 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:41 pm to JoLeUGA
Georgia's QB has a small dick. FACT
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:41 pm to Lefebvre
quote:
Every time I go anywhere in America though, I see LSU fans
it's hard to miss the colors Purple and Gold. Very few teams use this combo.
This post was edited on 10/2/09 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:41 pm to JoLeUGA
Here’s the Top 10, according to Street & Smith’s SportsBusiness Journal, using figures from the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act.
1. Texas: $72.95 million
2. Georgia: $67.05 million
3. Florida: $66.01 million
4. Ohio State: $65.16 million
5. Notre Dame: $59.77 million
6. Auburn: $59.67 million
7. Michigan: $57.46 million
8. Alabama: $57.37 million
9. Penn State: $53.76 million
10. LSU: $52.68 million
1. Texas: $72.95 million
2. Georgia: $67.05 million
3. Florida: $66.01 million
4. Ohio State: $65.16 million
5. Notre Dame: $59.77 million
6. Auburn: $59.67 million
7. Michigan: $57.46 million
8. Alabama: $57.37 million
9. Penn State: $53.76 million
10. LSU: $52.68 million
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:42 pm to ACL11190
You're a queer for looking. FACT
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:42 pm to JoLeUGA
You obviously missed the photoshoot of him.
This post was edited on 10/2/09 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:42 pm to JoLeUGA
quote:
Descending order per football revenue intake...
UF
AU
UA
UT
LSU
UGA
UK
USC
Arkansas
Vanderbilt
UM
MS
Link? I found this:
LINK
These lists have nothing to do with anything. All this tells me is that UGA overcharges for football tickets and AU tshirts cost more than UA tshirts!
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:43 pm to attheua
quote:
Not sure what that has to do with anything?? LSU wasn't good for about 100 years, but they still have a good sized fanbase.
It means Alabama doesn't have the largest football fanbase. And I never claimed LSU does.
It's clearly Florida at this point. It helps that 1) they've won 2 of the last 3 national titles 2) have the best/most popular player in CFB 3) they're the largest school and probably have the largest alumni base 4) they play in the largest state in the South (region)
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:43 pm to thebearisdead
But I'm almost positive there is a direct correlation in the teams current performance... So the number of "fans" probably changes year to year..
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:44 pm to JoLeUGA
I wouldn't go completely on income for the size of fanbases. For instance, Alabama would be higher on that list if not for having one less home game during that season. We pocketed 2.5 million for the Chick-fil-A Kickoff, but that pails in comparison to another home game. And think about Tennessee. That insane recruiting budget has to come out of something.
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:45 pm to ACL11190
Those financials are simply false regaurding UT. UT is one of the few , if not the only, Athletic Department in the country that recieves no funding from the University or the state. Since they are purely a private institution, they choose not to release any financial information regarding the athletic department.
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:45 pm to thebearisdead
quote:
These lists have nothing to do with anything.
This list has everything to do with it... I'm trying to give you objective evidence, where everything you will try to say is subjective...
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:46 pm to TouchdownTN
quote:lsu doesn't either, and i'm sure there are others that don't as well
Those financials are simply false regaurding UT. UT is one of the few , if not the only, Athletic Department in the country that recieves no funding from the University or the state. Since they are purely a private institution, they choose not to release any financial information regarding the athletic department.
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:48 pm to attheua
quote:
These lists have nothing to do with anything. All this tells me is that UGA overcharges for football tickets and AU tshirts cost more than UA tshirts!
AU and UGA aren't the ones making bogus t-shirts claiming we're number 1 in spring game attendance.
Posted on 10/2/09 at 4:49 pm to TouchdownTN
quote:
Those financials are simply false regaurding UT. UT is one of the few , if not the only, Athletic Department in the country that recieves no funding from the University or the state. Since they are purely a private institution, they choose not to release any financial information regarding the athletic department.
UT is a public institution, and therefore all athletic info is public as well.
Just about every SEC athletic dept is separate from its university, but that doesn't mean you don't have to comply with freedom of info act requests.
*that's how the news of our NCAA trouble broke

This post was edited on 10/2/09 at 4:51 pm
Popular
Back to top
