Started By
Message

re: Better addition: arkansas or South Carolina?

Posted on 3/29/13 at 9:10 pm to
Posted by mograyback
Member since Jul 2011
7102 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

And frick you Walmart haters, I don't think I could live without 'em.


Wal-Mart sucks, and it's a perfect example of crony capitalism.

The fact that you couldn't live without 'em is rather irrelevant.
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Dumb arse they can't have 11 teams, it's the big TWELVE with 2 teams they want available in your scenario.

Good god you are retarded


How about you read what I asked... Here's the ORIGINAL question

quote:

This would be a good way to judge the answer to that. If Arkanas, Mizzou and USCe was looking to join a conference besides the SEC, who would be picked up first...


RETARD.... ya know like aTm was picked before MIZZOU. Now your turn... Conference USA would take you before Mizzou
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
67720 posts
Posted on 3/29/13 at 9:14 pm to
They'd take both like I said, which is first is irrelevant in that scenario.

Probably take Arkansas first anyways regardless.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter