Started By
Message
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:01 am to MontyFranklyn
Eh, having a stolen is pretty bad and should be punished significantly. It's technically non violent but still
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:01 am to South Alabama Tide
quote:
You have to present yourself as an officer of the law. Technically, Robinson can sue since he did not consent to anything. Even with reasonable suspicion and probable cause, nothing can be done until you present yourself as an officer of the law.
You should offer to represent them...
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:01 am to South Alabama Tide
quote:
You have to present yourself as an officer of the law. Technically, Robinson can sue since he did not consent to anything. Even with reasonable suspicion and probable cause, nothing can be done until you present yourself as an officer of the law.

Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:01 am to VermilionTiger
Damn.. What is going on in this thread? lol
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to Patton
quote:
That's what they were about to do? Break into a home and kill people?
His point was that it was non violent because nothing happened yet. That's terrible logic. I was using an extreme example completely not related to this incident
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to South Alabama Tide
quote:
You have to present yourself as an officer of the law. Technically, Robinson can sue since he did not consent to anything. Even with reasonable suspicion and probable cause, nothing can be done until you present yourself as an officer of the law.
Rationalizing stage
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to South Alabama Tide
Uh that's completely wrong
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to South Alabama Tide
quote:
You have to present yourself as an officer of the law. Technically, Robinson can sue since he did not consent to anything. Even with reasonable suspicion and probable cause, nothing can be done until you present yourself as an officer of the law.
YES..YES...GOOD
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to tigerskin
quote:Every player Saban recruited since he came to the SEC has a NC ring. (except the players that were dismissed and transferred)
Almost every player that chose LSU from 2000 to 2011 has a National Championship or SEC championship ring.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Rationalizing stage
Melt stage is next, right?
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to AHCOO
A whole shitload of Gumpology....
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to higgs_boson
quote:
The ones really enjoying this need to realize it is just luck it has not happened to their team this off season.
And it is not over yet. Don't get me wrong, I love it when we beat Alabama on the field, but I don't see how anyone could take pleasure in this situation.
Young men all over the country need to be taught lessons, their fathers sure as hell aren't.
You find LF with a stolen gun and drugs. Get him out of here.
Bar fight is a lil diff. Most kids get into a bar fight and aren't having their shoes confiscated looking for DNA evidence. I have nothing against a lil fighting. When the young guys go out they get harassed, I used to see it all the time in tigerland. People talking shite to ball players.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:02 am to bamasgot13
quote:
regardless of what happens in 2016, Hootie has 2 SEC championship rings and a Natty. Adams will leave LSU with zero championships, like most Tigers do.
Big dick Bubba doesn't care about SEC championships or Natty's. All Hootie will know how to do is put on lipstick and grab his ankles while Adams is wiping his arse with Benjamins
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:03 am to CNB
Shhh he thinks this is a video game.
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:03 am to AHCOO
lol this thread is pinned! Haha
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:03 am to MontyFranklyn
quote:
So ruining both of their lives for a non violent offense is the answer? How is that helping either of them?
So giving them a slap on the wrist for illegal possession of firearms is the answer? We should wait until it becomes violent? How is that helping anybody?
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:03 am to VermilionTiger
So you're saying that having a stolen weapon shouldn't be that big a deal since they hadn't done anything violent yet? 
This post was edited on 5/17/16 at 10:04 am
Posted on 5/17/16 at 10:03 am to VermilionTiger
It was non violent because there was an absence of violence. Are we going to start punishing people because we are pretty sure of what they were going to do next?
Popular
Back to top



1










