Started By
Message
re: Auburn to be 7-0 for the LSU game?
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:11 am to Tiger Prowl
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:11 am to Tiger Prowl
quote:
Florida owns UGA
You do of course realize that over the last 10 years Georgia has in fact won more games than Florida, and that is it only because FLorida is in the same division as them that they don't have several SEC championships, and probably a couple BCS championships, don't you?
Silly to say you'd love to have UGA on your schedule every year, UNLESS you're a Gator fan.
1
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:11 am to Jrv2damac
How did Crompton do against us last year? That's more relevant than Jarret Lee.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:13 am to lowspark12
"lowspark" should be "Highblaze"...
Relax, dude. It's the morning after a long weekend and you're getting all wacky because someone doesn't feel the way you do about your schedule? Really?
I hope you're a teenager.
Relax, dude. It's the morning after a long weekend and you're getting all wacky because someone doesn't feel the way you do about your schedule? Really?
I hope you're a teenager.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:13 am to lowspark12
quote:
My suggestion to Klaus, quit complaining
I'd take the LSU v UF series over any other game. Love how you thought that was complaining. You called our schedule a joke, I just mentioned that we do play Florida. UF>>Ball St, West Va, La Tech combined.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:14 am to AuburnCPA
That's a far reach. More like 5-2 or 4-3.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:15 am to bcshog
I think he was making the point that UGA on the schedule is better than having Florida on the schedule.
How many other teams that Georgia beats is not relevant to who is stronger when UF and UGA meet head-to-head every year.
How many other teams that Georgia beats is not relevant to who is stronger when UF and UGA meet head-to-head every year.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:17 am to Manchurian Tiger
I'm simply pointing out this dumbass's assertion is ridiculous and that he should look in the mirror.
LSU and AU have, what?, 5 common opponents, and we're playing a tougher OOC, yet our schedule is a joke?...
just a bunch of complaining from an LSU fan who realizes his team has not chance against Florida, especially considering the way they played last Sat.
LSU and AU have, what?, 5 common opponents, and we're playing a tougher OOC, yet our schedule is a joke?...
just a bunch of complaining from an LSU fan who realizes his team has not chance against Florida, especially considering the way they played last Sat.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:18 am to Klaus
Wrong, Klaus... I called your OOC schedule a joke.... which it is.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:19 am to lowspark12
quote:
just a bunch of complaining from an LSU fan who realizes his team has not chance against Florida, especially considering the way they played last Sat.
So because of the lackluster win over Washington we have no chance vs Florida ? I strongly disagree.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:21 am to I-59 Tiger
It was tongue and cheek.
Of course you have a chance... and the same team that seemed to struggle with 0-20 UW will be much improved come the florida game.
Of course you have a chance... and the same team that seemed to struggle with 0-20 UW will be much improved come the florida game.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:21 am to AuburnCPA
Think you have a fair shot at being 6-1 to start, but a rough streach to finish with LSU, Ole Miss, UGA, Bama. (Furman in between for laughs)
you may lose 4 of your last 5.....
you may lose 4 of your last 5.....
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:23 am to lowspark12
It amazes me how confident and cocky some fans are after one game.
AU played La Tech. Are you proven all of a sudden?
You think that UW & La Tech are equals? Is LSU and AU of Week 1 against uncommon opponents = how each team will look 7 weeks from now?
Are you serious? This from a "football fan"?
AU played La Tech. Are you proven all of a sudden?
You think that UW & La Tech are equals? Is LSU and AU of Week 1 against uncommon opponents = how each team will look 7 weeks from now?
Are you serious? This from a "football fan"?
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:25 am to Manchurian Tiger
I think had La Tech and UW played last season, La Tech would've won by 7-10 points.... now, this season, UW probably wins a close one.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:26 am to lowspark12
You want to be taken seriously, but you keep saying that UW was 0-20. They are now 0-15.
Trust me, it wasn't due to a lack of talent. Just like your 5-7 campaign wasn't due to lack of talent. Do you want to be judged by the same measure you apply to UW to make your snips at LSU seem legitimate?
I don't think so. Be careful when you live in a glass house. Don't be hypocritical while trying to expose someone. You end up being the one with the light on you looking very transparent.
Trust me, it wasn't due to a lack of talent. Just like your 5-7 campaign wasn't due to lack of talent. Do you want to be judged by the same measure you apply to UW to make your snips at LSU seem legitimate?
I don't think so. Be careful when you live in a glass house. Don't be hypocritical while trying to expose someone. You end up being the one with the light on you looking very transparent.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:29 am to Manchurian Tiger
.... keep trying to legitimize a rough showing. What are you, a teenager?
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:31 am to Manchurian Tiger
you're right, MT... they're 2-22 over their last 24....
it's pretty obvious talent wasn't their problem.
it's pretty obvious talent wasn't their problem.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:34 am to AuburnCPA
So you are saying the Tech game was the turning point for Auburn's football program. Please, your offense ran the ball against a junior high sized d-line. Tech is going to fair well in the WAC but you should have won this game.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:35 am to lowspark12
don't have to legitimize anything. it was week one, on the road, against a BCS school. what is there to legitimize?
is la tech BCS? did you NOT expect to play well against la tech?
sounds like we had higher expectations against a BCS opponent while you were thoroughly shocked and surprised at your showing against la "freaking" tech. a team that lost many seniors after a successful 08 campaign.
take a moment to digest this one and tell me if you should be trying to call out a team beat you in your house with a freshman int-machine and poor defensive play.
is la tech BCS? did you NOT expect to play well against la tech?
sounds like we had higher expectations against a BCS opponent while you were thoroughly shocked and surprised at your showing against la "freaking" tech. a team that lost many seniors after a successful 08 campaign.
take a moment to digest this one and tell me if you should be trying to call out a team beat you in your house with a freshman int-machine and poor defensive play.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:38 am to lowspark12
you're hopeless, lil guy.
you really don't understand football and matchups.
you really think that you can compare lsu vs uw to au vs latech. wow.
i'm glad you're an auburn fan. i guess that's why you're not getting much support from your brethren.
you're really young, stupid, or both. you should try one of the non-sports boards.
you really don't understand football and matchups.
you really think that you can compare lsu vs uw to au vs latech. wow.
i'm glad you're an auburn fan. i guess that's why you're not getting much support from your brethren.
you're really young, stupid, or both. you should try one of the non-sports boards.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:39 am to Manchurian Tiger
don't have to legitimize anything. it was week one, on the road, against a 2-24 BCS school. what is there to legitimize?
fixed it for you.
fixed it for you.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News