Started By
Message

re: Auburn fans: Are any more of y'all hearing...

Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:48 pm to
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3665 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

I'm not sold on that



You will be based on how the D plays the rest of the season. Experience really matters.

ETA: Maybe not this weekend, because we don't match up with Arky very well. But as for UF, LSU, UGA, and Bama, I think you will see more of the SC game than the Clemson game.
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 7:50 pm
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92762 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Roof will be back, so get used to it.


I highly doubt that. Everywhere he's been, the team has fielded a shitty defense. It isn't just because we run a HUNH offense. This year your excuse is youth. When he got here, the excuse was depth. Last year he had Fairley, and we still ranked mid/low in defensive stats. It's time to lose the excuses and eliminate the problem, which is Roof...

quote:

I think (probably like you) KF gives us a better opportunity to win long term, especially if we can't get better pass protection


I agree with this 100%. However, even if the pass protection isn't there, he can at least tuck it and run, unlike Trotter... It also seems like Trotter is staring down WRs and not looking off the defense. When nothing is there, he takes a sack. He's also been making horrible decisions with the ball lately.

quote:

AJ Greene has had a rough go of it


TBH, I've never been impressed with him.

He was abused last year before being hurt, and has been abused everytime this season...

quote:

but Eltoro is improving.


Meh, dude can't een learn the playbook. It sucks, too. He has all the talent and build you look for in a compact LBer. He's also pretty fast.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

but who the frick kidnapped Malzahn?


I think that was a Chizik Offense and Defense yesterday. Equal and opposite reaction thing...
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3665 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Everywhere he's been, the team has fielded a shitty defense. It isn't just because we run a HUNH offense. This year your excuse is youth. When he got here, the excuse was depth. Last year he had Fairley, and we still ranked mid/low in defensive stats.


You are waaaay off on all of the above. If I cared enough (and I believe this has been hashed out on this board earlier in the year), I would go pull out all of Roof's stats in his previous stops, typical defensive stats opposite HUNH offenses, Tuberville's 2008 recruiting class, lack of experience in 2011, etc. These are LEGITIMATE reasons why our defense struggles at times.

Just watch the back half of this season. Watch our youngsters mature. I bet you will feel differently about Roof in November.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92762 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

You are waaaay off on all of the above


LINK

You were saying...
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40289 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:09 pm to
Yea, my biggest concern is that Chiz is a Tampa 2 guy, which is primarily a zone defense. However, when i've watched Roof's defenses in the past, they have been a pretty heavy zone defense as well, but they do blitz more. Chizik has definitely gotten more hands on with the D as far as practice goes, but I'm not so sure they was necessarily his D.
Posted by Eagle Of War AU
Auburn
Member since Nov 2010
663 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:10 pm to
Roof and chizik where having a heated conversation when SC was about to have a 3rd & 17-20ish. Chiz was pissed and you could tell by chiziks hand expressions that he was explaining to roof the saftey positions. I saw several indications that told me chiz was still letting roof have input but when he didn't like what roof called he changed it.

I'm sure roof is still getting a chance to try but fwiw, IMO, next Saturday win ot lose, chiz is calling the shots. Doesn't mean that all the good defensive plays chiz calls and all the bad ones roof calls but I do believe roof still has some input.

Put it this way, the weakest part of our D has been tackling. If they can correct even half of it we will win a couple of more games.
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3665 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

LINK You were saying...


Typical. You have to dig deeper. Every coach is not dealt the same hand.
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 8:12 pm
Posted by ALcapone
Member since Nov 2010
3828 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:20 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 8:21 pm
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40289 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:20 pm to
Posted by auzach91
Marietta, GA
Member since Jan 2009
41281 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:24 pm to
roof has sucked everywhere he has been. i dont see why you are even trying to argue that. at duke he sucked, gt, and then minnesota. dont you think there is a reason he was the DC at minnesota and duke(HC), and not at a half way decent school? he sucks, and is a middle of the road (at best) DC.
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

bullshite.

You need to go back and look at their respective defensive philosophies.

Chizik mainly plays zone. He likes to keep plays in front of the defense and force the offense to have long drives where they have to execute repeatedly to score.

Roof prefers playing man. He likes blitzing, attacking-type defenses.

What you saw yesterday was Chiz acquiescing to Roof because it's hard to play "bend but don't break" when your DL can't get pressure and your D can't tackle. Whomever is claiming that yesterday was Chizik's D has instantly outed themselves as someone who doesn't know dick about football or our team.


So, you would say, a "bend but don't break" philosophy would then give up more yards, but less points then, correct? No big plays? Keep everything in front of you?

Okay, let's look at that then. I've already covered what Chizik accomplished as a DC in scoring D (7/8 years in the top 32). Let's look at his defenses based on total defense.

2005 (Texas) - 10th - 302.9 yds/game
2004 (Auburn) - 5th - 277.6 yds/game
2003 (Auburn) - 5th - 281.6 yds/game
2002 (Auburn) - 26th - 328.1 yds/game
2001 (UCF) - 16th - 307.3 yds/game
2000 (UCF) - 28th - 323.8 yds/game
1999 (UCF) - 60th - 373.7 yds/game
1998 (UCF) - 26th - 322.2 yds/game

So out of 8 years being a DC, he's defenses have finished in the top 28 7 times.

And to further prove my point, here are some shots of Texas '05 defense. I spent maybe 5 minutes searching for this to prove my point.


The MLB and FS are both going to zone, while the 2 CBs, SS, and OLBs are playing man.


Same thing on this play, except the SS moves into the box to cover the RB.


Here is a blitz that you say Chizik never used.

The DE slides out and gets the FB coming out of the backfield while the blitzer effects the QB throw.


Another OLB blitz, with man played on the outside. The SS has walked up into the box. I saw McNeal do this a couple of times yesterday...


Three WRs on the top are all lined up man to man, while the OLB blitzes.


I could add more, if you need it.
This post was edited on 10/2/11 at 8:33 pm
Posted by blzr
Saratoga
Member since Mar 2011
30744 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:31 pm to
With the boom, we played a good bit of man in 04 IIRC
Posted by Sigma
Fairhope, AL
Member since Dec 2005
3665 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:33 pm to
Seriously? You pick out a few plays to characterize an entire philosophy? No wonder TT cited your work...
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:34 pm to
Why dont you share where you "heard"?
Posted by taylormade
Bakerhill
Member since Jan 2011
9883 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:35 pm to
Chiz had to continue the spurrier/sc losing streak to Aub..



quote:

TTsTowel




Posted by auzach91
Marietta, GA
Member since Jan 2009
41281 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:36 pm to
so are you actually backing roof for the defense he has fielded at auburn?
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92762 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Why dont you share where you "heard"?


The OP pretty much explains it. Just that some have said that Chizik has taken over the D for the most part. Whether it's true or not, who knows. We'll see how the defense is playing and adjusting to certain things. And preparation.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92762 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

taylormade


What's going on, taylormade?

Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 10/2/11 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Seriously? You pick out a few plays to characterize an entire philosophy? No wonder TT cited your work...


Good retort.

I guess when someone actually shows you proof, just go ahead and make up some bullshite.

Should I pick out every single play in Gene Chizik's entire coaching career? Do you know where I could get that?

These were on highlights from only 2 games Texas played in 2005 (Texas A&M & Colorado). You think he didn't deploy this in more than only two?

You truly are pitiful.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter