Started By
Message
re: As if we needed proof that things have changed for real - WSJ article
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:03 pm to Daowna
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:03 pm to Daowna
Well, since my response to the Bama fan was evidently not sufficient to portray my stance, and you felt the need to offer further “correction,” I felt obligated to make my motivation clearer. I already know everything you and the Bama fan told me. I’ve taken SEO-type classes before.
1
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:07 pm to FootballFrenzy
I read it, I enjoyed the article, thank you for sharing
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:07 pm to Old Sarge
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:07 pm to FootballFrenzy
And yet you're blind posting articles to tRant accusing people of having an attention span of a Tiktok addict for giving you grief about the points I and others have laid out at your feet.
Solid SEO skills there. Pointless conflict caused by your own inadequacy.
Solid SEO skills there. Pointless conflict caused by your own inadequacy.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:09 pm to Daowna
I’m not sure what’s in the water where some of you guys are at
But maybe TexAgs is more your speed?
The article is pretty relevant, it breaks down how just a year and a half ago our entire program was incomplete ashes
And shines a light on the progress that has been made as well as a recruit that stuck it out, and that is now enjoying it live very least being competitive
It’s kind of crazy, but on the one hand, we have fans that attack other fans for trolling, which is the purpose of the rant, and on the other hand, we have fans attacking fans for posting informative articles
Good grief
But maybe TexAgs is more your speed?
The article is pretty relevant, it breaks down how just a year and a half ago our entire program was incomplete ashes
And shines a light on the progress that has been made as well as a recruit that stuck it out, and that is now enjoying it live very least being competitive
It’s kind of crazy, but on the one hand, we have fans that attack other fans for trolling, which is the purpose of the rant, and on the other hand, we have fans attacking fans for posting informative articles
Good grief
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:10 pm to Old Sarge
On the contrary I think this kind of post would be exactly TexAgs' speed.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:11 pm to Daowna
What I meant was the rant isn’t the place for Aggie on Aggie violence 
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:12 pm to Daowna
quote:
And yet you're blind posting articles to tRant accusing people of having an attention span of a Tiktok addict for giving you grief about the points I and others have laid out at your feet. Solid SEO skills there. Pointless conflict caused by your own inadequacy.
Because I don’t care enough about generating clicks or downvotes enough to do anything more than paste the article.
Stop making a mountain out of a molehill, and stop being so high and mighty.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:13 pm to Old Sarge
Oh, Sarge, I don't hold back on our own. I do not have a 'us vs them' type of mentality. But I understand what you're saying with that.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:14 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
the rant isn’t the place for Aggie on Aggie violence
Let's not be too hasty
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:15 pm to Daowna
quote:
I do not have a 'us vs them' type of mentality
I've noticed you are a very fair poster.
Or an alt.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:15 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
Because I don’t care enough about generating clicks or downvotes enough to do anything more than paste the article.
But you do care enough to respond to me and others pointing out your post flaws. Evidence is most every response you have in this thread.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:15 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
Too much TikTok spoiled your attention span?
No. Just don't care enough about A&M to read all that. My extent to caring is my hope that if you do manage to win it all the news of your accomplishment is drowned out by the start of another World War like the last time you won it all back in '39
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:16 pm to MtVernon
Quit edging over there MtV. I know you love this shite.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:18 pm to MtVernon
We could always start talking about arch Manning again?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:19 pm to Daowna
quote:
your post flaws
Sure, you know more than me about trying to get people to fawn over your posts.
Happy?
This post was edited on 10/22/25 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:21 pm to FootballFrenzy
Not what I was going for, but I'll take it.
Have a good one.
Have a good one.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:21 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
Here is my response: I do not care. I posted it. Read it or don’t. I genuinely do not care. It was posted for three or four out of several hundred people who would click on the thread and find it interesting.
And you’re welcome.
I think the problem is you just made a very general title with a wall of text. Thus nobody has any reason to be engaged or figure out what the frick it is.
If it's important, someone else will post it and do a better job.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:22 pm to Daowna
I harbor no ill will. Have a good rest of your day, and gig ‘em.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:29 pm to FootballFrenzy
Just wondering if you see the irony in this conversation
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News