Started By
Message

re: ACC Network DOA

Posted on 11/3/15 at 6:45 pm to
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34919 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 6:45 pm to
Actually someone literally said it:

Soundcloud Link
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 6:49 pm to
Did we read the same post?
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34919 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 6:51 pm to
Probably not, he has a lot of them in this thread. I assumed the last one before the curse word, but you know what assumptions do.
Posted by usctarheel19
Columbia, SC
Member since Jul 2015
35 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 6:55 pm to
Cardboard, Think it was in reference to my post.

Nc14, If you go to UNC fan sites, majority are pro SEC. Believe what you will!
This post was edited on 11/3/15 at 6:57 pm
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 6:57 pm to
Not sure what your point is but mine is that the SEC does not need the weak shite from NC or VA in our conference.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34919 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

Cardboard, Think it was in reference to my post.


How can someone have 18k posts and not know how the forum works?

I mean I appreciate the answer but I am still baffled.
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
33753 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 7:11 pm to
Culturally, the best fits are NC State and VA Tech. NCSU isn't as elitist as UNC, Duke, and Wake. They have also had more sustained success in football (the 7 to 9 win variety, but still success) than any of their rivals. People sell this school short. The Raleigh market is a good one, and like A&M, NCSU has the potential to grow quickly if out from under big brother's thumb.

As for VA Tech, they don't bring the TV market the way that UNC or NCSU can, but they have a very solid fanbase and a great track record in football over the past 20 years. Culturally, they fit the best of any of the other teams out there in football, and would immediately be a solid rival to UT, a NC school, and USC.

UVA may look more attractive on the surface, but it is as elitist as a private school can get. They are not a big football power, and even though they are a bigger school, they aren't going to deliver more, if even as many, tv eyeballs as VA Tech. UVA is fool's gold in athletics.

As for UNC, they are the best school in the bunch. However, make no mistake, they give even less of a damn about football than UK. Maybe they would come in ahead of Vandy, but what does that tell you. Just look at Kinnick Stadium. It's a joke. That program is a JOKE.

Honestly, I don't think UNC, UVA, or Duke would accept a bid to the SEC. I really think they would turn it down flat. They are old guard, east coast snobs. They are going to hold out for the B10, while Wake and GA Tech pray they get to tag along.

As for the Big 12, I don't think any of the old ACC members would go there, other than maybe Wake or GA Tech, if they got left out in the cold by the B10. I do know that Memphis, Cincinnati, and Houston are spending money on facilities and upgrades as fast as they can make or borrow it to position themselves for a Big12 jump. All of them, along with South and Central FL and BYU, have been discussed as an easy road for hat conference to get back to having a football title game.
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:12 pm to
This has to remain of the first page. Aggie ignorance abounds.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34919 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:14 pm to
You flatter us sir!!!
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29311 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

As a UNC alum and fan, I'd love to get UVA and join the SEC. Hopefully that'd get our administration to place more focus on football


I'd rather y'all bring Duke with you so the SEC gets full ownership of the best rivalry in college basketball.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

As a UNC alum and fan, I'd love to get UVA and join the SEC. Hopefully that'd get our administration to place more focus on football




quote:

UVA may look more attractive on the surface, but it is as elitist as a private school can get.


But it's a quiet, unspoken, elitism.

quote:

UVA is fool's gold in athletics.


Which is why we won the Capital One Cup?
This post was edited on 11/3/15 at 8:24 pm
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:23 pm to
Nobody wants NC or VA to join the SEC. Ignore the ignorant. Enjoy basketball and women's soccer.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

Nobody wants NC or VA to join the SEC. Ignore the ignorant. Enjoy basketball and women's soccer.


Someone's got hurt feelings.
This post was edited on 11/3/15 at 8:25 pm
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:25 pm to
Can't help you there. Do you have at work benefits?
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
33753 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

UVA is fool's gold in athletics. Which is why we won the Capital One Cup?


Other than baseball and a semi-relevant basketball program, you guys bring nothing of real value. Minor sports win may win Capitol One Cups, but are completely irrelevant and don't make your school, or a conference, any money. Your football program is below average in a below average conference. It has no place in the SEC.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

Your football program is below average in a below average conference.


Below average? It's terrible

We haven't been good since Welsh was fired.

quote:

Other than baseball and a semi-relevant basketball program, you guys bring nothing of real value. Minor sports win may win Capitol One Cups, but are completely irrelevant and don't make your school, or a conference, any money.


So not a Lacrosse fan?

You're missing out!

The ACC sponsors a number of minor sports, which probably lose more than they make. Still, from a TV perspective they provide a wealth of live programming which would be useful for network purposes.

You don't have to show reruns in the football off season. You'd actually have a wealth live programming to cover.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:51 pm to
I'm not sure how you automatically jump from this:

quote:

(ESPN) had come back and said that in some of the other instances where (conference) networks have started, they lost considerable amounts of money in the first couple of years.


to a network that isn't even a conference network (LHN).


The only conference network started by ESPN is the SEC Network.
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
33753 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

So not a Lacrosse fan? You're missing out!


I actually think lacrosse is a cool sport and watch it every so often when I see it on ESPN. It just isn't something you see in the SEC. I don't know of any institutions that play. That's more of a NE/East Coast thing, I guess.

I don't hate UVA. I just don't think they are a great fit for the SEC. That said, they would fit right in when it comes to baseball. Our schools have had a couple of battles in recent years.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
156122 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:01 pm to
I miss George Welsh.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34919 posts
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:13 pm to
When it's in a parenthesis its not exactly what they said.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter