Started By
Message
re: A&M opens as 2.5 point favorite over State
Posted on 10/29/12 at 1:37 pm to BigAggie06
Posted on 10/29/12 at 1:37 pm to BigAggie06
He played in the second quarter of the Bama game when it was 14-0
0
Posted on 10/29/12 at 1:37 pm to BigAggie06
the answer bigaggie would be no
This post was edited on 10/29/12 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 10/29/12 at 1:37 pm to BigAggie06
I don't see how that's relevant to this question:
quote:
except that malena gets more yrds/carry than any of your RB's
Posted on 10/29/12 at 1:40 pm to Slippery Slope
quote:
Slippery Slope
we are all intelligent people (i hope). we can all easily infer that the comment was meant to regard all backs that receive reps that matter. but fine, since you obviously dont have the ability to infer, i will change my original statement to "malena gets more yrds/carry over any back that receives meaningful reps"
Posted on 10/29/12 at 1:42 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
"malena gets more yrds/carry over any back that receives meaningful reps"
my view of meaningful reps could be different than yours so Griffin > Malena
Posted on 10/29/12 at 1:50 pm to TeLeFaWx
We have 7 WR's that have caught a TD pass this year and that doesn't count Hicks, Lamonthe, or Holmes. I guess it depends on how many catches you expect of your 3rd stringers to be considered part of your "depth".
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:04 pm to pivey14
quote:
But we are 8 deep as well.
Please. Of top 40 WRs by stats:
A&M
Rank REC YDS AVG TD
#3 Mike Evans 47 705 15.0 2
#8 Ryan Swope 36 520 14.4 5
#27 Thomas Johnson 23 278 12.1 1
UR Uzoma Nwachaku 15 217 14.5 4
Total 121 1720 14.1 12
MSU
#10 Chad Bumphis 30 486 16.2 6
#15 Chris Smith 29 366 12.6 2
#34 Arceto Clark 18 248 13.8 0
UR Marcus Green 17 191 11.2 5
Total 94 1291 13.5 13
A&M top 4> MSU top 4, and Thomas Johnson isn't even a starter. A&M has better WRs, PERIOD.
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:08 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
A&M has better WRs, PERIOD
This is pretty fricking obvious
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:08 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
Please. Of top 40 WRs by stats:
He said we weren't 8 deep and I presented 8 WR's who all have receptions and get in the game every weekend. Never did I state that our top 4 are better than your top 4.
This post was edited on 10/29/12 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:10 pm to pivey14
quote:
I would say the WR's are even
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:10 pm to pivey14
quote:
Our RB's are better than yours and you know it
quote:
Our pass blocking is better than yours
easy now, pivey
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:11 pm to pivey14
quote:
Our RB's are better than yours and you know it. Our pass blocking is better than yours, but you have us beat by a lot with run blocking. I would say the WR's are even. LB's are probably even as well; Matthew Wells was born to QB Spy quarterbacks like JFF. Everything else is correct.
I should have included this quote originally as well. If you would like, I can include additional stats to show our depth > MSU depth.
ETA: For the record, I don't think this game will be a pushover. I am very worried about State's ability to generate turnovers as we have been prone to give it away to teams good at getting takeaways.
That being said, to suggest that any part of the MSU offense is better than A&M's, with the possible exception of run blocking, is a complete and utter joke.
This post was edited on 10/29/12 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:14 pm to StrickAggie06
quote:
But we are 8 deep as well.
My comment
quote:
Wrong.
TeLaFaWx's comment
This post was edited on 10/29/12 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:14 pm to StrickAggie06
Does it matter
We are going to beat the frick out of yall
We are going to beat the frick out of yall
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:14 pm to Tds & Beer
quote:
Our pass blocking is better than yours
I got them backwards...I cleared this up already
I still would take our RB's over theirs
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:18 pm to schlow mo
quote:
We are going to beat the frick out of yall
Want to join Coonass on my ban bet?
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:23 pm to GalvoAg
Now why the hell would I do that
You are already banned when you lose
Me being added does nothing for the bet
You are already banned when you lose
Me being added does nothing for the bet
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:26 pm to schlow mo
If you were so confident "We are going to beat the frick out of yall" then it should be easy. Sadly you are to big of a pussy and actually think your team might lose.
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:28 pm to GalvoAg
No you are stupid. Why would he risk himself getting banned if it could already happen if you lose to Coonass. It's simple logistics
Posted on 10/29/12 at 2:28 pm to GalvoAg
Of course there is a chance we lose
Just like there is a chance I win the lottery tomorrow
Chances of either happening are infintesimal though
Get ready to be grinded you little bitch
Just like there is a chance I win the lottery tomorrow
Chances of either happening are infintesimal though
Get ready to be grinded you little bitch
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News