Started By
Message
re: A UGa Win and Alabama still making the Playoffs: Chaos for the P5 Conferences
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:54 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:54 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I did answer. You don't have to like the answer.
But your answers make no sense. Here is what djs said: "The rankings show they consider ou better based on 12 weeks. There is only one more game to consider and y’all aren’t playing the better opponent."
What would change the committees mind to jump OSU over a high ranked team playing a higher ranked team than OSU is. There would be no reason for them to jump OSU over Oklahoma.
1
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:55 am to djsdawg
quote:
You answered with a lazy question, and then u didn’t list anything under what the committee considers that will change with one more game. Then you ignored my final point.
I answered with a rhetorical question, then pointed out why you're wrong. I shouldn't need to fill in all of the blanks for you.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:55 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
That means almost nothing for Sunday.
It means a lot. It’s 12 games of info. That’s a ton of info. What about game #13 would cause your rankings to flip should you both win?
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:56 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
then pointed out why you're wrong
Empty words because you couldn’t provide any details, which are required for a proper answer.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:57 am to DawgsLife
quote:
would be
It's silly to think that a close and sloppy win, like a 59-56 type win, over Texas would be given the same weight as a dominant win like 59-0 over Northwestern.
This isn't that difficult. You're acting like you know what the committee will do based on previous weeks, and they've repeatedly shown that you have no idea what they'll do.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:58 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
No they aren't. They're seven spots apart, despite the difference in records.
Your the one that said there wasn't much of a difference. now you want to switch to my side?
quote:And ranked much lower, right now because of their schedule.
So indeed. UCF also has fewer losses...
So...
I know you aren't being serious to compare Oklahoma to UCF.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:58 am to djsdawg
quote:
It means a lot. It’s 12 games of info. That’s a ton of info.
And how much separates Ohio State and Oklahoma for the committee right now?
Posted on 11/29/18 at 10:59 am to djsdawg
quote:
Empty words
Yawn. That you don't like them doesn't make them empty. You were wrong, obviously.
at you for only making the points that supported your argument.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:01 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
dominant win like 59-0 over Northwestern.
Beating 8-4 Northwestern 100-0 would be meaningless. You needed to be playing an 11-1 or 10-2 type opponent in your Championship Game. Instead you got a mediocre 8-4 Northwestern which does zilch for your resume.
This post was edited on 11/29/18 at 11:01 am
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:01 am to DawgsLife
quote:
Your the one that said there wasn't much of a difference.
*You're
And yes, I said that, and I was correct.
quote:
And ranked much lower, right now because of their schedule.
Fewer losses, right?
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:01 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
It's silly to think that a close and sloppy win, like a 59-56 type win, over Texas would be given the same weight as a dominant win like 59-0 over Northwestern.
I will give you this. If Okalhoma/Texas is a sloppy, close game and OSU absolutely dominates Northwestern then OSU has a shot. but that would be the only scenario...and it might not be enough.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:02 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Beating 8-4 Northwestern 100-0 would be meaningless.
Wrong, especially when taken in totality.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:03 am to DawgsLife
quote:
I will give you this. If Okalhoma/Texas is a sloppy, close game and OSU absolutely dominates Northwestern then OSU has a shot. but that would be the only scenario...and it might not be enough.
This would have been much easier if everyone just admitted this from the start.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:03 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Wrong, especially when taken in totality.
Beating Northwestern (no matter the score) does very little to nothing for your resume.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:04 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
And yes, I said that, and I was correct.
And yet there is a big difference in 7 places in the standings.
quote:So, you are going to persist in the UCF verses Oklahoma resume?
Fewer losses, right?
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:04 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
That you don't like them doesn't make them empty. You were wrong, obviously.
Empty because you provided zero details, and still haven’t.
You simply said the committee considers a lot, but you ignore that they you behind ou, uga, and bama based on all of those considerations.
There is only a very little bit left for them to consider, and northwestern is a less impressive opponent than your main challengers have.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:05 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
This would have been much easier if everyone just admitted this from the start.
yet the chances of that happening are slim. I expect Oklahoma to win by 2-3 TD's.
And, as I said, that would be the only scenario that OSU would have a chance and it would not be a given then.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:11 am to Jake_LaMotta
quote:
Beating Northwestern (no matter the score) does very little to nothing for your resume.
That's wrong, on several levels. First, it would make us champions of a top two conference. It also would give us a win over a team that the committee says is #21. It makes us 13-1.
Seems that it certainly does more than "little to nothing."
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:13 am to djsdawg
quote:
Empty because you provided zero details, and still haven’t.
I already covered that. I'm not filling in the blanks for you. The committee considers a wide range of information that's readily available to anyone interested in finding it. I shouldn't have to do that for you in this discussion.
Might be time for you to move on if you're simply going to whine about that.
Posted on 11/29/18 at 11:16 am to DawgsLife
quote:
And, as I said, that would be the only scenario that OSU would have a chance and it would not be a given then.
I've never even come close to saying anything is a given. Exactly the opposite, actually.
Comments were made that with Oklahoma and Georgia wins, Oklahoma and Bama were locks. That's just not true, obviously.
Page 7 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News