Started By
Message
re: 16-14
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:31 pm to CatsGoneWild
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:31 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:
Why dont you post the head to head record since the SEC became a conference
Thanks to Michigan, they have a winning overall record conference wise. 98-92-7 since the SEC was formed in 1933.
This post was edited on 12/31/10 at 12:32 pm
1
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:34 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Thanks to Michigan, they have a winning overall record conference wise. 98-92-7 since the SEC was formed in 1933.
Wrong answer. Try again.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:36 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
come on sec boys. i wanna hear a real discussion. not attacks in trying to avoid teh truth
Big 10 19-31 in bowl games the last 7 years. One winning bowl season. Yeah, the big 10 is one tough conference.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:36 pm to CatsGoneWild
Where are you getting your info?
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:47 pm to Colonel Flagg
quote:
So is James Madison better than Viginia Tech?
This line has become the "So Trent Dilfer is a better qb than Dan Marino" line of the season!
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:52 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Where are you getting your info?
Trust me, you are wrong. I said head to head, which was teams that were members of those conferences at that time. Basically for example, you cant put PSU in the talks until the early 90's when they joined the Big 10. You cant include USCe or Arkansas until 1991 since they joined the SEC in 91. You also have GT who was a member of the SEC for 30+ years.
Head to head, the SEC is 67-48-2 vs. the Big 10
Head to head in bowl games the SEC is 33-20 vs. the big 10 up until 2007. I dont know the bowl record the last 3 years head to head. Dont have time to look.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:53 pm to ole orange
quote:
This
Oh, and take your pansy arse big 10 pieces of shite that you call refs with you
Dude your team had their azzes handed to them by a basketball school.
At least you can write a complete sentence unlike that Bama retard RJYF. I am supposing that you learned how to do that AFTER you moved to Ohio.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:56 pm to GamecockAlum
quote:
Your only National Title came courtesy of shitty officiating.
And how did USCe's National Championship happen?
That wasn't fair. Tell me about your conference football championships.
Ok Now list at least your division champs.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:56 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:
I said head to head, which was teams that were members of those conferences at that time
Going that route, then yeah, my numbers won't match up. There's been several teams that played each other, but not in the current conferences they're in, so in that respect you're correct. However, if you take who is current members and their overall record against who is current members against the others, it comes up to the numbers I provided. I figured overall records would be fair enough.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 12:59 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
I love how you SEC fans spin this. If you win the capital one its just another example of your greatness. But when you lose its who cares bout that game, we werent up for i
Yankee... meet bammer logic
bammer logic meet Yankee.
and you can bet your arse is bama looses to Michgan St it'll be because everyone said they'd be in the NC but didn't make it. It's because they didn't care to be there
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:02 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
ohio state should have been up 17-7 if robo doesn't drop that pass. different game then
can't look at what ifs, it works both ways
where in the post you quoted is the word 'if'. he wasn't talking hypotheticals, he's simply saying that LSU ran a train on tOSU and the game was over early.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:06 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
16-14
that's a pretty shitty record when you consider that your co-champ is playing against our #4 seed like this year in the cap one game.
what's your record whenever your #1 plays our #1.
that's the only one that holds water.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:09 pm to finallyfastohio
Here's all the games from the 1998 season to now. I'm tallying down the score of wins and losses, but eliminating the Michigan>Vanderbilt types, where one team is placed higher in its conference than the other. To balance out the numbers, I count #6 and #7 in the SEC as equals, and count #8 in the SEC as #7 in the Big Ten, #9 as #8, #10 as #9, etc...
1/1/2: 1 Illinois < 1 LSU SEC
9/19/98: 7 Indiana < 6 Kentucky
9/19/99: 8 Indiana < 6 Kentucky
9/16/00: 9 Indiana < 12 Kentucky SEC
12/1/1: 4 Indiana > 11 Kentucky
9/14/2: 10 Indiana < 8 Kentucky
9/20/3: 9 Indiana < 10 Kentucky SEC
9/18/4: 10 Indiana < 11 Kentucky SEC
9/17/5: 10 Indiana > 9 Kentucky B10
1/1/4: 4 Iowa > 4 Florida B10
1/2/6: 3 Iowa < 5 Florida SEC
1/1/5: 1 Iowa > 3 LSU
1/1/9: 4 Iowa > 5 South Carolina B10
1/1/0: 2 Michigan > 1 Alabama B10
1/1/99: 1 Michigan > 3 Arkansas
1/1/1: 1 Michigan > 2 Auburn
1/1/3: 3 Michigan > 2 Florida B10
1/1/8: 2 Michigan > 4 Florida
1/1/2: 2 Michigan < 2 Tennessee SEC
9/2/6: 2 Michigan > 11 Vanderbilt
1/1/0: 2 Michigan State > 2 Florida B10
1/1/9: 3 Michigan State < 3 Georgia SEC
12/31/4: 8 Minnesota > 7 Alabama B10
12/30/2: 7 Minnesota > 4 Arkansas B10
1/1/10: 4 Northwestern < 7 Auburn SEC
9/4/10: 7 Northwestern > 11 Vanderbilt
1/8/7: 1 Ohio State < 1 Florida SEC
1/7/8: 1 Ohio State < 1 LSU SEC
1/1/1: 4 Ohio State < 3 South Carolina SEC
1/1/2: 3 Ohio State < 4 South Carolina SEC
9/11/10: 3 Penn State < 5 Alabama SEC
1/1/3: 4 Penn State < 4 Auburn SEC
1/1/99: 5 Penn State > 6 Kentucky B10
1/1/10: 2 Penn State > 3 LSU B10
1/1/7: 4 Penn State > 5 Tennessee B10
1/1/0: 6 Purdue < 5 Georgia SEC
1/1/4: 2 Purdue < 3 Georgia SEC
1/1/7: 2 Wisconsin > 2 Arkansas B10
12/31/3: 7 Wisconsin < 6 Auburn SEC
1/2/6: 2 Wisconsin > 3 Auburn B10
1/1/5: 3 Wisconsin < 3 Georgia SEC
1/1/8: 4 Wisconsin < 2 Tennessee
SEC 18
Big Ten 12
Basically, when matched straight up, the SEC wins 60% of the time. It is absolutely clear that the SEC is better than the Big Ten by a considerable margin.
1/1/2: 1 Illinois < 1 LSU SEC
9/19/98: 7 Indiana < 6 Kentucky
9/19/99: 8 Indiana < 6 Kentucky
9/16/00: 9 Indiana < 12 Kentucky SEC
12/1/1: 4 Indiana > 11 Kentucky
9/14/2: 10 Indiana < 8 Kentucky
9/20/3: 9 Indiana < 10 Kentucky SEC
9/18/4: 10 Indiana < 11 Kentucky SEC
9/17/5: 10 Indiana > 9 Kentucky B10
1/1/4: 4 Iowa > 4 Florida B10
1/2/6: 3 Iowa < 5 Florida SEC
1/1/5: 1 Iowa > 3 LSU
1/1/9: 4 Iowa > 5 South Carolina B10
1/1/0: 2 Michigan > 1 Alabama B10
1/1/99: 1 Michigan > 3 Arkansas
1/1/1: 1 Michigan > 2 Auburn
1/1/3: 3 Michigan > 2 Florida B10
1/1/8: 2 Michigan > 4 Florida
1/1/2: 2 Michigan < 2 Tennessee SEC
9/2/6: 2 Michigan > 11 Vanderbilt
1/1/0: 2 Michigan State > 2 Florida B10
1/1/9: 3 Michigan State < 3 Georgia SEC
12/31/4: 8 Minnesota > 7 Alabama B10
12/30/2: 7 Minnesota > 4 Arkansas B10
1/1/10: 4 Northwestern < 7 Auburn SEC
9/4/10: 7 Northwestern > 11 Vanderbilt
1/8/7: 1 Ohio State < 1 Florida SEC
1/7/8: 1 Ohio State < 1 LSU SEC
1/1/1: 4 Ohio State < 3 South Carolina SEC
1/1/2: 3 Ohio State < 4 South Carolina SEC
9/11/10: 3 Penn State < 5 Alabama SEC
1/1/3: 4 Penn State < 4 Auburn SEC
1/1/99: 5 Penn State > 6 Kentucky B10
1/1/10: 2 Penn State > 3 LSU B10
1/1/7: 4 Penn State > 5 Tennessee B10
1/1/0: 6 Purdue < 5 Georgia SEC
1/1/4: 2 Purdue < 3 Georgia SEC
1/1/7: 2 Wisconsin > 2 Arkansas B10
12/31/3: 7 Wisconsin < 6 Auburn SEC
1/2/6: 2 Wisconsin > 3 Auburn B10
1/1/5: 3 Wisconsin < 3 Georgia SEC
1/1/8: 4 Wisconsin < 2 Tennessee
SEC 18
Big Ten 12
Basically, when matched straight up, the SEC wins 60% of the time. It is absolutely clear that the SEC is better than the Big Ten by a considerable margin.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:23 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Going that route, then yeah, my numbers won't match up. There's been several teams that played each other, but not in the current conferences they're in, so in that respect you're correct. However, if you take who is current members and their overall record against who is current members against the others, it comes up to the numbers I provided. I figured overall records would be fair enough.
we are basically both correct,
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:29 pm to xiv
Its not about the Big 10, its about their traditional powerhouse school.
Dude... 0 and 9.
The moment Ohio State gets west of Colorado or south of Missouri they shite their pants and start shaking like my dog in a thunderstorm.
Dude... 0 and 9.
The moment Ohio State gets west of Colorado or south of Missouri they shite their pants and start shaking like my dog in a thunderstorm.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:29 pm to CatsGoneWild
It's all about whether you want to be consistently mediocre or the best. That's the point of this thread. Once you get out of the BCS bowls; motivation becomes a tricky thing.
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:32 pm to finallyfastohio
I'm not going to read any of this...0-9
Posted on 12/31/10 at 1:35 pm to finallyfastohio
YANKEES!!!!!!11
Posted on 12/31/10 at 2:24 pm to McKeezy
quote:
I'm not going to read any of this...0-9
In less than a week O-H and 1-0
Posted on 12/31/10 at 2:58 pm to Eagle Of War AU
quote:
Yankee... meet bammer logic
bammer logic meet Yankee.
quote:
and you can bet your arse is bama looses to Michgan St it'll be because everyone said they'd be in the NC but didn't make it. It's because they didn't care to be there
World... meet Auburn lack of education
Auburn lack of education meet permanent lack of employment
Surely you meant lose when you said wrote "loose," right? Or did you in fact mean loose, like your mother?
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News