Started By
Message
re: New lawsuit against Baylor Football Program
Posted on 1/28/17 at 10:11 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
Posted on 1/28/17 at 10:11 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:Yeah, because that's totally what I said.
Well if its only 25 rapes i say let them all off the hook.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 12:33 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Well if its only 25 rapes i say let them all off the hook
Another great example of the intellectual epidemic of our time.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 12:38 am to Sleeping Tiger
Like your dumb arse assumptions are anything of genius. Sometimes i wonder if you are playing a shtick or if you really are this much of a loser. I hope so, because you try way too hard to sound smart, and it always fails.
This post was edited on 1/29/17 at 1:21 am
Posted on 1/29/17 at 12:52 am to BlackPawnMartyr
Hahaha. Melt, bitch.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 1:05 am to Sleeping Tiger
Cliches are never a clever come back. I guess it wasn't a shtick after all. Next time you cry to the board about ending everything like a little bitch, show some resolve for once in your life and finish the job.
Night.
Night.
This post was edited on 1/29/17 at 1:06 am
Posted on 1/29/17 at 12:33 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Like your dumb arse assumptions are anything of genius
You're free to let me know what isn't accurate in my post on the first page.
That is, if you're capable of comprehending it..
You had trouble with pvilleguru's posts and those weren't too difficult.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 1:16 pm to navynuke
take a look at all these keyboard detectives, would ya.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 1:18 pm to MontanaMax
It's called using your human tools to critically think and process information.
It's a choice we make to use or not use these tools.
It's a choice we make to use or not use these tools.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 1:30 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Nah, it's called reading an article and making assumptions based on your own biased opinions.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 1:40 pm to MontanaMax
quote:
Nah, it's called reading an article and making assumptions based on your own biased opinions.
I haven't read any article..
Could the same not be said of you?
Posted on 1/29/17 at 1:46 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Sure could. That's why I'm not making any assumptions on the matter.
This post was edited on 1/29/17 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 1/29/17 at 3:36 pm to MontanaMax
There's nothing wrong with critically thinking and using your human tools to discern what is likely and what isn't.
That's the point of our existence -- to use these tools.
That's the point of our existence -- to use these tools.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 4:39 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Why don't you inform me of your definition of "human tools" and critical thinking?
Posted on 1/29/17 at 6:41 pm to MontanaMax
If you need it explained to you how we can use our tools to discern the likelihood of something, then I don't think explaining it would do you any good.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 8:36 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Right well, I ask because critical thinking involves putting all personal opinions to the side and coming to a logical conclusion based off of information given. Your past post are all speculative and involve personal opinions and you even admitted to not reading the article. And when you use phrases like "human tools" without giving an explanation of what you mean by it, then it conveys that you don't even know what you mean by it.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 8:54 pm to MontanaMax
Human tools would be intuition -- that should be understood.
And this doesn't make sense.
quote:
And when you use phrases like "human tools" without giving an explanation of what you mean by it, then it conveys that you don't even know what you mean by it.
And this doesn't make sense.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 10:29 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Its pretty straight forward. Just because you use some made up phrase that you think sounds smart, does not mean that it's understood what the meaning is.
Just because you say you used intuition to come to your conclusions does not negate the fact that everything you've said has been subjective and not critical analysis. You have a "hucnch" based off of what? Information you gathered from reading the article? (which would have been acceptable) No, your thoughts on the case were drawn of your own opinions on the issue from the thread title about an article you didn't read.
My "human tools" tell me that have some false sense of intellectual superiority.
Just because you say you used intuition to come to your conclusions does not negate the fact that everything you've said has been subjective and not critical analysis. You have a "hucnch" based off of what? Information you gathered from reading the article? (which would have been acceptable) No, your thoughts on the case were drawn of your own opinions on the issue from the thread title about an article you didn't read.
My "human tools" tell me that have some false sense of intellectual superiority.
Posted on 1/29/17 at 11:29 pm to MontanaMax
When you think of words in your head are the letters written in crayons?
Posted on 1/30/17 at 10:35 am to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
When you think of words in your head are the letters written in crayons?

That'll be my last post because you are obviously a dumb frick, who may or may not have Asperger's, and will argue in circles.
Posted on 1/30/17 at 10:57 am to navynuke
I think Baylor has officially taken the title of Rape-U, from the Tennessee Volunteers.
Back to top
