Started By
Message
re: Duck Dynasty and the great pussification of America
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:33 am to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:33 am to TbirdSpur2010
1
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:33 am to DCRebel
quote:
Then yes, in the very stupidly narrow window you've chosen to look through, no, there isn't a heterosexual equivalent of a gay pride parade. I'm not sure what you think this reveals but whatever.
It's still the only example given of how homosexuals flaunt their sexuality in everyone's face more than heterosexuals.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:34 am to The Spleen
Work filter blocks some pictures so I can't see that, but I can only hope it was a funny anecdotal reference to slipping it in the wrong hole. For some reason how much pain they get from that is a small reassurance you got a sizable wiener, and I've always secretly loved how much pain they are in.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:34 am to DCRebel
quote:
Then yes, in the very stupidly narrow window you've chosen to look through
Oh please, I provided one example and backed it up. You're ignorant if you believe that's my entire opinion.
quote:
no, there isn't a heterosexual equivalent of a gay pride parade. I'm not sure what you think this reveals but whatever.
You can't follow a conversation, obviously
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:34 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Not even close to the same thing, but if you're so foolish as try and insinuate that gay rights and the CRM for blacks are the interchangeable, I'm down to laugh at you for it
You inferred that. I didn't imply it.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:35 am to Stonehog
The man cited 'sins' from the Bible. He listed them off. That's not hate speech. He's a devout Christian who takes the Bible literally. THAT is what it is.
To call it hate speech is harsh and an overreaction.
To call it hate speech is harsh and an overreaction.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:35 am to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Work filter blocks some pictures so I can't see that, but I can only hope it was a funny anecdotal reference to slipping it in the wrong hole.
It was a better picture of what's in your sig
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:36 am to DCRebel
quote:
You inferred that. I didn't imply it.
Now who's splitting hairs?
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:36 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
heartbreakTiger
Huzzah for bedrest!
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:37 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
They are not the same.
To you.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:37 am to The Spleen
quote:
It's still the only example given of how homosexuals flaunt their sexuality in everyone's face more than heterosexuals.
And one can literally go THEIR ENTIRE LIFE without actually seeing a gay pride parade.
"UGH GET THAT shite OUT OF MY FACE" as if there's a goddamn daily parade of twinks right outside of your front door.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:37 am to Stonehog
quote:
To you.
As a black man, I think my opinion on the matter carries a little more weight. Much different perspective than you.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:39 am to cas4t
quote:
The man cited 'sins' from the Bible. He listed them off. That's not hate speech. He's a devout Christian who takes the Bible literally. THAT is what it is.
He doesn't take the bible literally. If he did, he would be out killing gay people like the bible instructs.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:39 am to Spaceman Spiff
quote:
freedom of speech?
has nothing to do with Phils suspension.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:39 am to DCRebel
quote:
And one can literally go THEIR ENTIRE LIFE without actually seeing a gay pride parade.
"UGH GET THAT shite OUT OF MY FACE" as if there's a goddamn daily parade of twinks right outside of your front door.
I grew up in Dallas and I've never seen a gay pride parade. I think we sort of passed the level of super flamboyance. Lots of them now are really mellow and filled with baby strollers and stuff supposedly. Bourbon Street and Manhattan I've seen the most rainbow flags out and about.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:39 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
As a black man, I think my opinion on the matter carries a little more weight
It doesn't.
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:40 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Oh please, I provided one example and backed it up. You're ignorant if you believe that's my entire opinion.
No, you're picking nits. You're saying "well gay pride parades are flaunting of gay sex" and then refuting any response that isn't literally a heterosexual equivalent. My point is that sexuality of almost every stripe is celebrated in contemporary culture, so calling one form of it "flaunting" shows your biases.
But, hey, you're right, there are no heterosexual pride parades. How on earth am I going to get my fix of straight sex now?! How am I going to know that heterosexuality is the accepted mainstream of society?! (Oh yeah, television, movies, music, etc.)
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:41 am to Stonehog
quote:
It doesn't.
Ok, Stonehog, ok
We're done here. I gotta go help my wife unload some furniture. Needed that laugh, though.
Preesh
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:42 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
You inferred that. I didn't imply it.
Now who's splitting hairs?
Splitting hairs? Do you even know what that means?
There's a hugh difference between implication and inference. Surely you know this. Differentiating between the two hardly insignificant or missing the point (which is what "splitting hairs" refers to - it's where one argues over a meaningless detail).
Posted on 12/19/13 at 9:42 am to Stonehog
Well this is from bsu.edu which is a site made clearly for the fight against hate.
this is how they definite it:
So I think it's safe to say you're being harsh.
This site paints a picture that reminds me of Westboro. Not some old man who is devout to his religion.
He didn't say anything to degrade them or harm them. He cited his religious beliefs.
here's the site FTR
LINK
this is how they definite it:
quote:
Hate speech consists of verbal and nonverbal expression that is used to demean, oppress, or promote violence against someone on the basis of their membership in a social or ethnic group. Hate speech involves more than simply indicating that you dislike someone. It also is different than simply teasing or ridiculing someone, or shouting an ugly word at them in a single moment of anger or frustration.
So I think it's safe to say you're being harsh.
This site paints a picture that reminds me of Westboro. Not some old man who is devout to his religion.
quote:
In many cases, hate speech is created by people who are part of a majority population. Their messages typically are directed toward people who are part of a minority population. The targets of hate speech are chosen just because they belong to that particular group of people. The messages of hate also are designed to degrade or otherwise harm these targets for the same reason.
He didn't say anything to degrade them or harm them. He cited his religious beliefs.
here's the site FTR
LINK
This post was edited on 12/19/13 at 9:43 am
Page 4 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News