Started By
Message
re: America needed to see Michael Sam kiss his boyfriend
Posted on 5/11/14 at 11:50 pm to Japowell98
Posted on 5/11/14 at 11:50 pm to Japowell98
I didn't notice til I passed it.
I had planned on doing some epic pseudo serious post on Missouri's southern roots. But typically I didn't plan enough and let it slip by with a whimper.
I had planned on doing some epic pseudo serious post on Missouri's southern roots. But typically I didn't plan enough and let it slip by with a whimper.
1
Posted on 5/11/14 at 11:51 pm to the808bass
There's a simple reason for that; population growth. Of course most religions in humanity's past outlawed homosexuality. They did it for the same reason that they encouraged families to reproduce like bunnies. It was in their interest to get every person possible making babies.
But all of that is moot. No one here is trying to seriously argue that there is a religious, or at least a Christian, justification for the allowance of homosexuality. It doesn't matter if there isn't because that in no way affects the legality of the practice or gay marriage. We don't live in a theocracy. If you want one move to Saudi Arabia or Iran.
But all of that is moot. No one here is trying to seriously argue that there is a religious, or at least a Christian, justification for the allowance of homosexuality. It doesn't matter if there isn't because that in no way affects the legality of the practice or gay marriage. We don't live in a theocracy. If you want one move to Saudi Arabia or Iran.
This post was edited on 5/11/14 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 5/11/14 at 11:53 pm to the808bass
Too bad... Oh well, there's always 20 thousand 
Posted on 5/11/14 at 11:56 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
They did it for the same reason that they encouraged families to reproduce like bunnies.
Plus you live longer if you don't gay it up. And that's important to civilizations.
And your second paragraph is one with which I largely agree. You can't force people to agree with your own particular morality from either side. We would probably be better off simply removing marriage from the government's domain altogether and let churches do marriages however they wish and have people who wish to form a civil union for legal and governmental reasons do so.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:12 am to the808bass
I agree 100%. But the homosexuals do not want that. They want the institution of marriage to recognize their union.
Pro gay marriage still can't find a single religion that constitute's their union. Accept that people are willing to give you rights. Just not man/woman rights as afforded by the union of the church.
Pro gay marriage still can't find a single religion that constitute's their union. Accept that people are willing to give you rights. Just not man/woman rights as afforded by the union of the church.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:16 am to NbamaTiger90
quote:
I agree 100%. But the homosexuals do not want that. They want the institution of marriage to recognize their union.
The agenda people do. The ordinary folk just want to live their lives. The elites want to change school curriculums and everything else based on getting gay marriage legalized. They'll eventually get their way. And eventually the Goths come for us all.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:18 am to NbamaTiger90
quote:
I agree 100%. But the homosexuals do not want that. They want the institution of marriage to recognize their union. Pro gay marriage still can't find a single religion that constitute's their union. Accept that people are willing to give you rights. Just not man/woman rights as afforded by the union of the church.
I sorta agree with this. Religion is man made anyway.Go make your own religion instead of trying to force the masses too except it
This post was edited on 5/12/14 at 12:20 am
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:19 am to LSUNV
religion board
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:20 am to Japowell98
Not a religious view point at all
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:22 am to LSUNV
Not your point, just posted it to the last poster. nothing about that post though
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:23 am to LSUNV
Agree with LSUNV.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:23 am to TbirdSpur2010
What up TB.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:24 am to the808bass
Should homosexual relationships be afforded the same tax structure as hetro sexual's, yes.
Your accumulated wealth should not depend on your sexual preference. Leave it to who you want.
Marriage is a concept of religion. Stop trying to change 5744 years of history.
6000 frick off
Your accumulated wealth should not depend on your sexual preference. Leave it to who you want.
Marriage is a concept of religion. Stop trying to change 5744 years of history.
6000 frick off
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:25 am to LSUNV
Chillin' mane, good to see ya!
Hope you had a good weekend.
Hope you had a good weekend.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:25 am to NbamaTiger90
at you think that history is 5744 years old. (or is it?)Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:26 am to NbamaTiger90
quote:
Your accumulated wealth should not depend on your sexual preference. Leave it to who you want.
Agreed.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:27 am to NbamaTiger90
quote:
Your accumulated wealth should not depend on your sexual preference. Leave it to who you want.
Also concur.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:28 am to TbirdSpur2010
Been outta pocket since Feb. with work. How is the military treating you
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:32 am to LSUNV
quote:
Been outta pocket since Feb. with work.
Yikes. Hope things start looking up--shite's not easy these days
quote:
How is the military treating you
Eh, same ol' same ol'. Got a list of complaints as long as your arm, just like every other person in uniform it seems, so I ain't special
Going on leave after tonight's shift, though, so I'm excited for a little r&r
Posted on 5/12/14 at 12:32 am to Japowell98
quote:
at you think that history is 5744 years old. (or is it?)
Er. You got books from before then?
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News