Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:20 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
And I don't really
Your magma has cooled
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:22 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Sleeping tiger, I hope you don't think I'm getting on a band wagon to ridicule you. Honestly, I just came here to find out what you think most likely happened regarding 9/11.
I know you've been honest with everyone and said you don't know for sure, and I think it's admirable to say that btw, I just want to know who you think was most likely the mind behind sending those planes into the buildings.
1) Who's plan do you believe it most likely was to send the planes into the buildings?
I just want to know a different perspective.
I know you've been honest with everyone and said you don't know for sure, and I think it's admirable to say that btw, I just want to know who you think was most likely the mind behind sending those planes into the buildings.
1) Who's plan do you believe it most likely was to send the planes into the buildings?
I just want to know a different perspective.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:24 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Far more science supports the opposite of what he's purposing.
ST way, way earlier in this thread.
Well that should be easy to prove. Lets see it. -- Trey
Well that should be easy to prove. Lets see it. -- Prettyboy
Well that should be easy to prove. Lets see it. -- SDAR
Well that should be easy to prove. Lets see it. -- The Joker
Well that should be easy to prove. Lets see it. -- Vols
You never responded to that.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:25 pm to Stacked
quote:
I just want to know a different perspective.
What have you done?
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:29 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
That was what's referred to as reinventing the same questions asked into a non threatening, supportive tone in hopes that it may spark a difference in the response given. I just want a single answer in this mother fricker and am trying to ask the simplest one, that requires no evidence, science or explanation. Only an opinion. Who does he think came up with the plans for the planes to crash into the buildings?
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:30 pm to Stacked
The answer only has to be a single name. Very simple.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:42 pm to Stacked
1. Give your point.
2. Any comment afterwards, act like you don't know what's going on.
3. When the person explains it several times, question the relevance of said statement.
4. Rinse.
5. Repeat.
This is Sleeping Tiger's entire gameplan. Getting a straight answer out of him is damn near impossible.
Sure, he'll demand that you answer his questions when he presents them, but he rarely answers a question in a straightforward way.
2. Any comment afterwards, act like you don't know what's going on.
3. When the person explains it several times, question the relevance of said statement.
4. Rinse.
5. Repeat.
This is Sleeping Tiger's entire gameplan. Getting a straight answer out of him is damn near impossible.
Sure, he'll demand that you answer his questions when he presents them, but he rarely answers a question in a straightforward way.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:44 pm to Stacked
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:46 pm to Stacked
quote:
1) Who's plan do you believe it most likely was to send the planes into the buildings?
I just want to know a different perspective.
I mean, I have some idea, but overall I don't know.
A point -- when someone is found dead it can be classified as a murder even though they have no idea who did it. Why isn't the same logic applied here? Most people want to know who did it before giving a real effort into learning about the event.
Besides jumping into a thread like this on occasion I don't concern myself much with this anymore. I concluded for myself, as have the majority of the civilized world, that the official story is a lie, I put a lot of energy into trying to tell others what I've learned until I decided to move on. I'd have to reapply myself to this topic if I wanted to feel like I was really mentally in shape enough to do this right, which is why I really haven't dug too deep in here.
It's also a thing like -- where do I even begin. There is a 6 hour documentary that I like, it includes the debunkers point to everything, but this extensive doc only covers a small fraction of the information. There are novels worth of info dealing with the relationships in Saudi Arabia, the CIA, the Taliban, and most of these bits of info aren't particularly meaningful without the broader context, which isn't something that can easily be shared without the people applying themselves to the research.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:47 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
A point -- when someone is found dead it can be classified as a murder even though they have no idea who did it. Why isn't the same logic applied here?
Because someone took credit for the murder with no reason to.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:50 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Sleeping tiger, fill in the blank.
I'll go first, and then you.
I believe the person most likely responsible, even if I'm not correct, is __________.
Me: Osama Bin Laden
You:
I'll go first, and then you.
I believe the person most likely responsible, even if I'm not correct, is __________.
Me: Osama Bin Laden
You:
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:50 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
when someone is found dead it can be classified as a murder even though they have no idea who did it. Why isn't the same logic applied here?
Because this is a conspiracy theory, and it's incomplete just to say the official story is a lie without naming a culprit.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:51 pm to StrawsDrawnAtRandom
quote:
1. Give your point.
2. Any comment afterwards, act like you don't know what's going on.
3. When the person explains it several times, question the relevance of said statement.
4. Rinse.
5. Repeat.
This is Sleeping Tiger's entire gameplan. Getting a straight answer out of him is damn near impossible.
I honesty couldn't do what you're doing without feeling like a bad person.
I'll just re link and copy and paste the below comments each time you pull this
LINK
I said much of our income tax goes towards the interest on the debt.
You said you're fine with that because the debt has afforded us the strongest military.
Then I informed you that the interest in which the income tax pays exists because our currency is loaned to us which negates what you said about the debt affording us a strong military.
Where is the mentioned debate style of mine in this situation?
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 8/29/14 at 5:58 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
Because this is a conspiracy theory, and it's incomplete just to say the official story is a lie without naming a culprit.
Not really.
You can determine that a death was by murder without naming the culprit.
Same is true here, work and research can be done that can bring you to an understanding that the official story is untrue.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 6:00 pm to Stacked
quote:
Me: Osama Bin Laden
You:
For one I'd say 'who is Osama Bin Laden' or should we call him Tim Osman, his CIA name. I believe there is a lot omitted about his relationship with the CIA and the CIA's relationship to these 'terrorist' organizations, not to mention his relationship to Saudi elite and the Saudi's relationships with the US elite.
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 8/29/14 at 6:00 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Sleeping Tiger
Name one undisputed fact. That's all. I don't need 6 paragraphs, 1 or 2 sentences will do.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 6:12 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Not really.
Yes really. This isn't a courtroom nor a murder case. This is a conspiracy theory, therefore the onus is upon you to direct us to where you believe the fault lies.
You can't just throw out "the official story is untrue" and leave it like that
Posted on 8/29/14 at 6:17 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I concluded for myself, as have the majority of the civilized world, that the official story is a lie,
This is just patently false.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 6:19 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
For one I'd say 'who is Osama Bin Laden' or should we call him Tim Osman, his CIA name.
Despite what name we call him, we know who I'm referring to.
Now you, even if it may not be right, who do you think is ultimately behind the planes hitting the buildings?
Page 42 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News