Started By
Message
Would we have been 9-3 if Daniel Parker stayed?
Posted on 11/29/22 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 11/29/22 at 3:58 pm
He would have filled two weaknesses. TE with good hands in the redzone and another great blocker on the line. Sadly, I think he was the biggest loss. Wingo and Hester were easily replaced and Bazelak is back in the portal.
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:33 pm to pauliebleaker
Would Daniel Parker still have domestic violence issues and be playing football if he stayed? He is off the team at OU.
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:44 pm to pauliebleaker
I thought this was sarcasm.
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:44 pm to mouse_cop
We do know our holding penalties, especially on touchdown plays, would quadruple at a minimum.
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:53 pm to pauliebleaker
You mean the locker room cancer, woman assaulting clown? That Daniel Parker?
The one who got kicked off of OU?
The one who got kicked off of OU?
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:56 pm to the808bass
I don't know if he was at the level of pass catcher to transform the offense. He was more of a killer blocker.
But he hits women so screw him. And I even started a post where I said I felt bad for him at OU.
But he hits women so screw him. And I even started a post where I said I felt bad for him at OU.
Posted on 11/29/22 at 10:03 pm to surgicalvenom
Since it was a hypothetical, i was inferring that a change of team wouldn’t lead to the same outcome with him or us.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)