Started By
Message

Would we have been 9-3 if Daniel Parker stayed?

Posted on 11/29/22 at 3:58 pm
Posted by pauliebleaker
Chesterfield
Member since Jul 2014
1820 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 3:58 pm
He would have filled two weaknesses. TE with good hands in the redzone and another great blocker on the line. Sadly, I think he was the biggest loss. Wingo and Hester were easily replaced and Bazelak is back in the portal.
Posted by RamboMizzou
Springfield
Member since Jan 2014
10208 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:33 pm to
Would Daniel Parker still have domestic violence issues and be playing football if he stayed? He is off the team at OU.
Posted by mouse_cop
The South
Member since Aug 2019
2876 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:40 pm to
No
Posted by deputyfife
Member since Dec 2013
1130 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:44 pm to
I thought this was sarcasm.
Posted by JBlutarsky
Member since Mar 2016
363 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:44 pm to
We do know our holding penalties, especially on touchdown plays, would quadruple at a minimum.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111795 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:53 pm to
You mean the locker room cancer, woman assaulting clown? That Daniel Parker?

The one who got kicked off of OU?
Posted by surgicalvenom
Omaha
Member since Jan 2014
5380 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 4:56 pm to
I don't know if he was at the level of pass catcher to transform the offense. He was more of a killer blocker.

But he hits women so screw him. And I even started a post where I said I felt bad for him at OU.
Posted by pauliebleaker
Chesterfield
Member since Jul 2014
1820 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 10:03 pm to
Since it was a hypothetical, i was inferring that a change of team wouldn’t lead to the same outcome with him or us.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter