1
Started By
Message
Revisiting was Mauk the issue
Posted on 10/17/15 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 10/17/15 at 9:50 pm
At least he gave us the extra dynamic of being able to run.
No significant advantage to passing with either qb
No significant advantage to passing with either qb
Posted on 10/17/15 at 9:55 pm to Mizzoufan26
Mauk would have, unfortunately I think, given us a much better shot at winning the game tonight. And maybe Florida too.
But coke dealers don't get to play D1 QB after you know they're a coke dealer.
But coke dealers don't get to play D1 QB after you know they're a coke dealer.
Posted on 10/17/15 at 9:59 pm to the808bass
Eh, the one thing about Lock is that he doesn't turn the ball over.
Mauk would have forced 2-3 bad passes tonight.
He would have ran for a few first downs, but I don't know if that would have made up for his 20 yard reversal runs he would also do.
I'm thinking that Pinkel knew this OLine was going to be terrible and that's why he kept throwing Mauk out there, he knew Lock was going to get beat to shite.
Mauk would have forced 2-3 bad passes tonight.
He would have ran for a few first downs, but I don't know if that would have made up for his 20 yard reversal runs he would also do.
I'm thinking that Pinkel knew this OLine was going to be terrible and that's why he kept throwing Mauk out there, he knew Lock was going to get beat to shite.
Posted on 10/17/15 at 10:00 pm to the808bass
Unless of course you are waiting on the results to come back in regards to the white powder substance being sold because hey, he may be dealing baggies of baking soda to bring refrigerator cleanliness to the forefront of everyone's minds
This post was edited on 10/17/15 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 10/17/15 at 10:11 pm to Mizzoufan26
TWO rushing TD's in SEVEN fricking games. TWO.
None of that blame is on ANY QB.
None of that blame is on ANY QB.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News