3
Started By
Message
Matlock
Posted on 9/15/15 at 10:59 am
Posted on 9/15/15 at 10:59 am
Someone tell me why the Tigers wouldn't consider putting Lock in at QB and Mauk at RB? Is it a slight to Maty? I don't see the negative and who flippin' cares if we win a SEC Championship!
Someone tell me why this is a bad idea, Prinz and Berk are fine as backups in case one goes down. Imagine the options!
Someone tell me why this is a bad idea, Prinz and Berk are fine as backups in case one goes down. Imagine the options!
Posted on 9/15/15 at 11:02 am to Ridgewalker
quote:
Someone tell me why the Tigers wouldn't consider putting Lock in at QB and Mauk at RB? Is it a slight to Maty? I don't see the negative and who flippin' cares if we win a SEC Championship!
Someone tell me why this is a bad idea, Prinz and Berk are fine as backups in case one goes down. Imagine the options!
It's interesting in this whole hypo that you seem to literally forget Zanders is on the roster.
If we are gonna use any of the QBs on the roster as a RB (and we aren't, but just for sake of argument) it'd probably be him.
Posted on 9/15/15 at 11:09 am to Ridgewalker
already been discussed, you're a day late and a few dollars short.
Posted on 9/15/15 at 1:06 pm to Jagd Tiger
I didn't forget about Zanders I just don't have a good enough sample, Mauk can run.
So Jagd what was the conclusion? Is a bit of snark all you have?
So Jagd what was the conclusion? Is a bit of snark all you have?
Posted on 9/15/15 at 1:37 pm to Ridgewalker
Oh, I don't know. Something to do with the SEC and having no resemblance of an offensive line
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News